Re: Wouldn't it be better
No he's a politician by profession - which means he just has to decide whether Apple or Samsung contributed most to his campaign the "correct" political party.
FTFY!
2400 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Apr 2008
"The American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) has filed a petition with the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to block Pandora from running a terrestrial radio station, claiming that to allow the streaming music service to do so would not serve the public interest cut into the available pool of money for executive bonuses"
FTFY!
Agreed!
BUT IT IS SONY
A company run by some of the most arrogant assholes on Earth.
The only mistake, at least in my mind, was that the product committed seppuku.
It should have been SONY executives that committed seppuku.
(Coming from someone who had a PC bricked by a Sony rootkit!)
There seems to be a trend right now where people will give up any long term advantages in return for saving a few quick pennies by using cloud services1. Yes, cloud services do have advantages. But nobody seems to be thinking twice about the advantage of having your *own* hardware and software in house - with full control over it2.
Obviously, you are someone who has been around this block at least once.
1Typified by the ignorant bean counter damagement mentality.
2 Owning your OWN hardware and having under YOUR control means that YOU KNOW who has access to that equipment and data. In light of the recent NSA spying revelations, would it not be prudent to know who can examine your data. If those 3 letter agencies have to enter your property to "see" your data; then you know that they are looking at you.
I've been asked to look at people's browsers on countless occasions because "it's slow" and/or "it doesn't show a lot of the page" and the reason "it's slow" and/or "it doesn't show a lot of the page" is because so much real estate in the window is taken up with stupid extension bars.
Do you mean like this?
http://www.woosk.com/2008/08/friends-dont-let-friends-use-ie.html
Cannot be screamed loud enough!!!!!
SONY!!!! The purveyors of computer damaging rootkits??
WHY would ANYONE trust their data archiving to kit made by a company known for being smug assholes.
You are begging for trouble, if not vendor or format lock-in.
Go anywhere else!!!! BUT NOT SONY!!!!
</rant>
Even today my errant mate is one of the only people who properly understands most of that preposterous computer system, so he had his job back within six months -- but at a higher rate than before :-)
I would have placed as a condition of re-joining that fucked up outfit, the dimwit that fired me got sacked, otherwise, they could go and fuck themselves.
Those self-important morons are quite likely to use you as a shield when someone higher up in the food chain decides to kick some ass.
I have always felt the best way to rid an organization of damagement is to give them (damagement) all of the rope they need, and let them hang themselves. It is much cleaner that way.
I would extend that to include any Microsoft Technology in critical applications.
After all, I would not want to be in such an elevator when its control computer running Windows for Smart BuildingsTM decides it is time to download its "Patch Tuesday" updates with their inevitable reboot.
I can imagine it now, you are heading to the top of a very tall building, when the intercom announces: "The control computer must restart to complete the updates. Your elevator cab may either freeze in place, or go into free fall. When the system reboots, control will resume."
Thus you begin your 7 minutes of terror. ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQ_8Md4iK-o )
Basically the issue is that leadership fails to listen to the people who are closest to the problem and lacks the ability to see the consequences of that failure.
What you have described sir, is better known as damagement, the bane of IT existence worldwide.
Sometimes the decision to continue to allow sales to a customer having difficulty is based on fears of antagonizing a customer.
I knew of one chemical supplier that had an exclusive relationship with a large US distributor for their product. Unfortunately, that supplier was squeezed by the nads when it came to payment.
They had to wait until the exclusivity agreement ran out before they could dump the customer. Afterwards, they learned their lesson and no longer sign exclusivity agreements.
Which would have caused a international shit storm guaranteed to make the current NSA spying scandal "child's play" by comparison.
If that were ever to occur, no future President or former President would ever be able to safely leave the country, because they risked arrest somewhere offshore. Don't you think that several countries would like to have "arrested" Bush if they could??? Obama would never take that foolish chance.
I NEVER said they weren't.
BUT(T), the continued existence of North Korea is an overgrown, swollen pustule on the backside of humanity, and should have been popped a long time ago.
South Koreans would not have had to endure 60 years worth of sabre rattling from North Korea's demented leaders had the war in Korea been WON.
NOW, do you get my point!???
Supposedly the goal of going to war is to WIN, and defeat your opponent.
Well, considering that North Korea has continued to exist since the armistice was signed in 1953, I certainly do not consider it a WIN, at best a 60 year old stalemate, one that has gone for too long.
IMHO, we can thank our friends at the UN for that.
EDIT TO Now, someone who is slightly awake will spout out that we didn't LOSE Korea. To that, I will say: "BULLSHIT!!!" Does the antics of their current leader OF NORTH KOREA suggest that we won?? If we WON, he would not be in power.
I needed to make it clear who I was referring to when I initially specified current leader, lest I piss off any South Koreans.
ICON awarded for my FAILing to be clear in the first post about who the "current leader" referred to.
I expect to be flamed for this, so, pardon me while I put on my Nomex suit.
There, now you can flame away.
Let us go back to end of WW2, Hitler was dead, Germany was defeated, we (that being the USA) nuked Japan twice, and that bloody war was over. Or was it? An awful lot of money got spent in the fight to defeat the Fascists. And the military-industrial complex took notice. President Eisenhower WARNED US about it, and no one paid any attention.
Rising out of the ashes, was a new villain: Communism, and the spread of the Red Menace across parts of Europe and Asia. That begat a new type of 'war', dubbed The Cold War. "We got to stop those goddam Russkies" paraphrases the sentiment of many politicians of the time. And the defense industry LOVED IT!!!. Politicians do not want to be seen as "soft on Communism", so they bought into the defense industry lie, hook, line and sinker. And the ($$$$BILLIONS) flowed.
The USA got itself tied up in two Asian wars (Korea and Viet Nam), and LOST both. Now, someone who is slightly awake will spout out that we didn't LOSE Korea. To that, I will say: "BULLSHIT!!!" Does the antics of their current leader suggest that we won?? If we WON, he would not be in power. Then there is that disgrace called Viet Nam, where the civilian leadership was too goddammed worried about 'image'. We should have either fought to win, or got the fuck out of there. If we had done the latter, who knows how many of the 58,000+ we lost there would have lived. But the defense industry kept raking in the $$$BILLIONS.
Fast forward to the fall of the Soviet Union. You might hope that with the demise of the Big Bad Bear, some of those $BILLIONS squandered on defense spending just might get re-directed into more useful purposes, rather than be squandered on weapons of war. You can bet your sweet ASS that the defense industry was going to do ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to keep that GRAVY TRAIN running. Along the way, the Cunts In America get us tangled up with all kinds of dictators and despots. That's OK, as long as they are OUR dictators and despots. You do know who we allied with in Afghanistan to defeat the Soviets, don't you???? Once we no longer needed them, they became expendable, and suddenly had an excuse to want to extract revenge. Now, we have been tied up in more war for the past 10+ years, and now it is $$$$TRILLIONS of GDP being squandered on the defense industry, and WEAPONS OF WAR. Isn't it about time that shit STOP!!!! With the winding down of those wars, the defense industry needs a new villain, a mythological villain called a terrorist.
So, let me pose this one simple question:
WHO has the MOST to lose if the $$$TRILLIONS now being squandered on weapons of war and defense spending were to suddenly vanish???
All of this bullshit about running around looking for terrorists is nothing more than a smokescreen for the defense industry to keep its GRAVY TRAIN running at full speed. And government officials (of BOTH parties) are willing accomplices.
Congress: representatives of the People bought and paid for by the special interests.
Let the flaming begin.