Dereum
Sounds like the name of a crypto-funny-money scheme.
Unfortunate.
16766 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Simple answer :
This option has been considered and, after much research (and an exploratory team sent to the Bahamas to witness cloud deployment on-site), the conclusion that imposes itself is that Cloud is not secure, not fit to host citizen's private data, not reliable enough, prone to lock-in and more expensive than it seems.
Therefor, for this contract, an on-prem solution will be preferred.
And there you go, problem solved.
Yeah, the lawyers thing. What the hell are they supposed to be doing at this point in time ? GDPR control to ensure that the IT guys aren't sneaking peeks at payroll data ?
You solve the technical problem, then you bring in the lawyers to sue somebody's pants off.
This is putting the cart before the horse. That rarely works well.
Unless . . . unless the lawyers are already drafting a defense against the sueballs that will be coming their way.
That might be it.
"You just do not get the same level of job satisfaction or client adulation when supporting clients remotely, do you? "
I feel fine working from my home office. I have a new customer that wants me on site now, and the highway and parking experience are every bit as horrible as I remember FBC (From Before COVID). Thankfully, that customer only signed for 3 days a week, and it would appear that, some days, I might be able to work remotely again.
I must have been a cave troll in a previous life.
I understand two things in this plan :
1) there is finally a chance that I no longer have to store 50 different chargers "just in case"
2) Apple is no longer to make a mint by purposefully designing chargers that are just slightly different for every one of its models so that it can extract a maximum of additional moolah from the idiots that buy from it
I think I would be quite happy with point #1 if I bought Apple gear, and I am very, very happy with with point #2 in any case.
Stop the waste. Be more customer-friendly.
Besides, your phones hardly differ from one year to the next. Stop churning out clones every 12 months.
Of course.
And you noticed that as soon as the lawsuit landed on your desk.
Congratulations on your foresight.
Facebook : when it comes to El Zuck's reputation, nothing is too expensive, but when it comes to behaving properly and policing its content correctly, that's too much.
Could somebody please shut this sewer rat down ?
"26 per cent of surveyed technology workers consider themselves 'elite performers' "
I am not an "elite" performer, I am a friggin' god of performance. If my salary was based on my personal assessment of my performance, I'd be paid €60,000 per month.
Unfortunately, I'm not really the one determining my salary, my clients are. So, as long as they keep calling me (and paying me), I am still the god of performance.
As long as it is clear that the bare minimum is being able to arrive at one's destination without plowing through a tree, another vehicle, a cyclist or a pedestrian, then I'm fine with that.
If, however, your "bare minimum" includes a monthly subscription to avoid baby strollers, you can fuck right off.
There is no bare minimum in autonomous vehicles. Either it does the job perfectly, or it is useless.
Strippers are a bonus. Millionnairs can pay for that. The rest of us just need it to work.
It seems rather obvious to me that all these info screens that bork because Borkzilla's system is inherently faulty are completely useless.
Not one of them have ever stopped a bus, train or cable car from functioning as intended.
Do away with the cruft already. If you want to display information, use Linux and configure it properly.
A bit much like Red Sparrow. Frankly, those Russkies should extend their lexicon a bit.
"The kill-switch is intended to be used by the operators only "
I think there is a very good kill switch available : the 9mm Parabellum.
You only need to know where to apply it.
Sorry, if you publish it, you cannot then pretend that you did not approve it.
You're not FaceBook, YouTube or a blog platform. You do not have the excuse that you don't know what your users publish. You're a journal and you are responsible for what you publish.
If you do not want to be their mouthpiece, then don't publish their bullshit.
That's like ATMs. Yes, they cost to put into service, but then they cost next to nothing to use and you can run them until they break down.
Now, an ATM doesn't have much as far as moving parts are concerned, but these robots seem to only have wheels - there are no arms or swivel head, so as long as the wheels are functional, they're good to go.
Managed by an outsourced company and put, obviously, in The Cloud - because apparently everyone has forgotten how to secure access to an internal server.
Well apparently they can also forget how to secure a cloud server. From an internal keyboard jockey that can be understandable, but from an outsourced company that presumably got the contract on the basis that it knew the job, it is not.
I hope that there will be sanctions against that company.
Thaler declares "we were very encouraged by the dissent of Lord Justice Birss who agreed with us that 'the creator of the inventions in this case was a machine is no impediment to patents being granted to this applicant…' "
What the judge said is "if Thaler had a "genuine belief" that DABUS was the inventor, and if the Intellectual Property Office had decided to record no such person on the forms, there was no reason to deny the patent "
Those two things are not the same. The judge did not "agree" that the inventor was a machine, he said that no name on a patent was not a reason not to have it filed.
That is how you manipulate opinion.
Are people who go to client site to do their jobs.
If they're not good enough, their claim is in the gutter and they won't be hired again.
A certification is not going to help, and I have known certified people who couldn't code their way out of a paper bag.
You spend an entire paragraph on 5G saying that it is all about processing close to the user.
Then you try to contradict that by saying that airplanes need to use local processing.
Well, that's about as close to the user as you can get.
I don't see the difference : in both cases, data is not being processed centrally.
One is not a contradiction to the other.
I'm glad the Royal Navy is able to spend that much time determining with precision who is to do what.
I do hope they do not use that system when it comes to targeting and weapon firing in combat, though.
What really worries me is the "we no longer have the skills to operate a paper chart " part. That clearly means that, in case the computers go down, the Royal Navy (and probably every other navy in the world) is dead in the water.
That part doesn't sound too good.
Far from a networking or server expert, but it seems to me that a server farm, with proper power and cooling and redundancy (not to mention bandwidth), costs a pretty penny.
And, if you want to give any sort of availability assurance to your potential customers, you have to have more than one.
That's likely to eat up a big chunk of those millions (well, faster than chairs would).
A KGB officer at the helm, jackboots in the streets ensuring order and thugs in the shadows silencing opposition.
It sounds a lot like what Solzhenitsyn wrote in the The Gulag Archipelago. Stalin is dead, but his legacy lives on.
It's going to take a long time for Russia to get out of that hell.
And how is it that the beancounters aren't up in arms about this ?
Beancounters love it when the spreadsheet shows profits rolling in and costs tightly contained.
Come to think of it, I don't much mind that myself.
Anyway, bills are never fun, but unpredictable ones can really stick in your throat. And the bigger you are, the worse they can get.
In-house. Yes, it's a hassle, but if you do it right, you have all the experience at your fingertips when things go wrong.
And things always go wrong, in the cloud or not.
I'd really like to see a warship without a crew.
What happens if there's a problem with the engine ? Does the vessel make a call to the helpdesk and some team needs to be shipped out to evaluate and make repairs ?
Today's fighting vessels are complicated beasts. Navigating is not an easy task, even with GPS. The vessel will need to be able to avoid storms, other ships, and plot a course to its destination that will optimize transit time while avoiding all dangers.
That is why all ships, merchant or military, have people in the bridge and the engine room, places where decisions need to be made and, occasionally, things can break. An uncrewed platform is going to be a long time coming, with or without "AI".
Not entirely true. They count on the paper the HR drone looks at.
Someone with a decade or more experience in the field will always know the incidental things that no university course can possibly teach (since the teachers do not go on client site), and will therefor be able to evaluate the total environment of the problem to find the real solution.
How is it different ?
Simple, the amount of emotional attachment to a loved one is vastly more important than the attachment to a video game.
I have video games that I have "loved" in the past, but OS versions have evolved and I can't play them any more. So I play with the games I "love" today. If I lose my PC due to a super solar storm that brings down the power grid of the planet, I will be mighty unhappy, but I won't build a shrine for it. I guess I'll actually <gasp> just have to go outside.
I lost my mother a decade ago now. I still think of her. I won't be thinking about a dead PC a decade later.
From what I understood, there is a Chinese version of Wikipedia (because the engine in free, anyone can create a wiki on any subject). That version is not under the control of the Wikimedia Foundation.
However, the Foundation discovered that there are apparently editors and sysops from China who are actively trying to subvert pages in the world-available Wikipedia, and the Foundation is trying to find a way to put a stop to that while respecting the "Encyclopedia anyone can edit" mantra.
What a nightmare.
And there is the problem : Uncle Sam let them out.
I think that, if you are working for a company that requires governmental approval to export what you are making, the government should also have a say in who you are allowed to go work for outside USA borders.
Yes, I know, it is a restriction of individual liberty, but honestly, it seems to be a necessity as well. These three not only brazenly quit to go work directly in the UAE for a competing company that openly worked in the same domain as the company they left, but they also recruited ex-colleagues, meaning yet more brain drain going where it definitely shouldn't.
And it would seem that they had no problem putting almost $1.7 million on the table to stay out of prison. I'm pretty sure that that means they have a lot more than that stashed away somewhere out of Uncle Sam's reach. They profited handsomely from torture and unjust surveillance, they should go to jail.
They have the population, COVID gave them the motivation, now they are starting to realize their potential.
The future of economic influence zones is going to be interesting. Australia is weaving accords with its nearest neighbors, now India and Singapore, China is desperately trying to find exchange deals with anyone willing to work for a dictatorship, I seem to remember reading about Brazil as well, things are moving forward.
And that means that the economical influence of the USA and Europe is waning.
Interesting times ahead.