"CISA's response is a long list of security controls and practices"
First point on the list : stop using Office 365.
No really, you're a defense contractor and you use The Cloud to store your documents ? Are you insane ?
16741 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
What ?
You are pushing people to access their bank account on the historically most insecure platform that exists ? On a platform that can be hacked just by sending a specifically-(mal)formed SMS message ? That doesn't even need to be read ?
Are out of your fucking minds ?
Laws perform no function, they're just signs written (or printed) on paper.
It is the application of the law that performs a function, and that is done by a human being.
As the USofA is demonstrating right now, human beings can be very selective in which laws they decide to apply and even how they decide to apply them (looking at you, Republicans).
What international law, pray tell ?
Which international law does Facebook think means it has the right to purchase any company it wants ?
If I'm not mistaken, Nvidia has just been prevented from realizing a $66 billion merger with Arm. Does The Zuck really imagine his $400 million merger is more important ?
Of course not. It's just that, as a complete human failure, he cannot compute when he hears "no".
The problem is how it is made.
If you're burning coal to transform H2O into hydrogen/oxygen, then you're not getting the benefits of hydrogen because you've burned coal.
The only way hydrogen can be justified is with nuclear/solar/wind energy.
We have to shut down the coal-based power stations. All of them. Of course, we can't do that in one go right away, we first have to get ITER to work and, concurrently, get Thorium stations installed everywhere.
Between the two, things just might work out.
But, Cambodia is a member.
Ah, so they have the USA approach to law. Good for them.
In any case, I note that "The exodus from Hong Kong to Singapore is well underway ", which is perfectly normal.
Yes, Hong Kong will become just another Chinese city. Yes, the Great Internet Firewall will be thoroughly applied. Yes, anyone with any sense of freedom and a smidgen of intelligence should get the hell out of there while they can.
There might still be money to make in Hong Kong, but it will be under Beijing's full control. Your choice.
It is still a very valid response.
It's right up there with "don't say anything in public you might regret".
Gossip used to be the drive to disseminate information. It was the old "can you keep a secret" and the next day you hear about it at the company lunch room.
Now we have Social Media, and gossiping is in overdrive.
The solution remains the same : only say something in public if you are willing to stand up and own up to it.
What Orwell could definitely not have imagined is that the surveillance society be implemented by companies and accepted without thinking by the global population.
Sure, NSA is tapping comms, but Facebook has access to almost everything and people are giving it freely.
It's one thing to wonder about using Signal or not, it's an entirely different kettle of fish when you post you entire life between Twitter, Instagram, FB and Tik Tok.
You're the engineer charged with implementing this National Internet Gateway, and you are quite capable (and you disagree strongly with the current regime). So capable, in fact, that you are considering building in a loophole, a backdoor of some sort, that only you know about and no one will be able to find.
You're sure you know how to do it, and you're convinced that no one will find out about it.
Do you go ahead and implement that, even at the eventual risk of getting caught (the consequences of which do not bear thinking about), or do you just do the job demanded of you and then plan on leaving the country ?
Beer for the round table discussion.
"they transmit alert notifications to let nearby iPhone users know someone else's active AirTag is, unbeknownst to them, reporting its location"
And just who decided that that was a good idea ? Why should I care that someone put an AirTag in their luggage ? What right do I have to know that ?
Technology : it's not because you can that you should.
I rather agree with that idea.
And basically I'll agree with anything that keeps the NSA away from my data.
Since I cannot prevent or forbid anyone from putting the data they gather on me in a cloud, well a sovereign cloud is the least bad option.
Of course, that presumes that the NSA doesn't have its claws in it in the backend somehow - and that might be quite a presumption.
Especially if the cloud uses Cisco hardware.
Wow. That's a lot of cat videos, to be sure.
Given that this is going to be a brand new cable, I'm guessing it will use the latest tech, signal multiplexing etc etc. We've seen articles here on transfer speeds in the lab, so what tech is actually going to go into this new batch of special fibres ?
We need a kitty icon.
Government creates for-profit enterprise to supply government, then decides that it can bestow contract on it without public tender.
No way anything can possibly go wrong with that.
Next you'll be telling me that there are absolutely zero MPs or parliament officials involved on either side of this deal.
Is Dido Harding lurking anywhere near ?
Wow. People have had to actually been surprised to come to this conclusion.
I must really be a cave troll. I only activate mobile data when I decide I need it. I only activate WiFi at home. I only activate BluTooth when I'm driving.
That means that I shut down mobile data when I'm done. I shut down Wifi when I'm done with it. I shut down BluTooth when I park the car.
Do these people ever turn off the lights ?
Okay, point 1 : the application supplier lied. What a surprise.
Point 2 : the application supplier mismanaged the project. Everybody knows that you accept a project on a given list of points. Anything else is punted on to the v1.1 to-do list.
Well, if you know how to run a project, that is.
"Other areas cited where the US exceled within IT were OS kernels"
I'm sorry, am I supposed to believe that the Windows 1 0 kernel is a point of excellence ?
Apple's iOS might be slightly marginally better, but I would still not call it excellent.
Linus Torvalds is the only person I know of who could be called excellent at OS kernels. The fact that he lives in the US now is just a coincidence.
Now, China may be behind on tech today, but thanks to the rampant and very public xenophobia of the previous US resident in the Oval Office, it has recieved the impetus it needed to start getting up and standing on its own two feet.
China might be suffering now, but the tech landscape will change and the US (and Europe) is going to have to learn to fight tooth and nail with quality, not just bluster, diplomatic backhandedness and aircraft carriers.
The dragon is waking up, and that is going to shake the market like nobody can imagine today.
Trump was a fucking asshole for four years in front of every camera he could find. And he was more of an asshole when cameras weren't there.
I agree with your point, Fox News is atrocious and should be banned and every so-called political figure that can't even read the Constitution should be jailed.
But until the voting public wakes up and stops watching the playoffs, it's not gonna happen.