What you call "nuclear" is currently Pressure Water Reactors.
The only reason this technology is employed is because, at the end of WWII, the governments wanted plutonium to make bombs.
There are other types of "nuclear", notably Thorium reactors. They leave an almost insignificant amount of radioactive waste (compared to PWR) and, more to the point, the security is passive.
With a PWR reactor, you need active surveillance, an experienced team 24/7, and maintenance costs are through the roof.
With a Thorium reactor, you can have one engineer on standby with a pager. If anything goes wrong, the salt plug at the bottom of the reactor basic melts and the entire radioactive basin is emptied into cooldown basins - the reaction stops. No risk of hydrogen buildup or explosions of any kind. All you need to do is wait until you can put everything back together again, with another salt plug.
The thing is, Thorium reactors do not generate plutonium. I couldn't care less. We have enough bombs, we don't need more.
We want to transition 100% of the current vehicle parc into electric vehicles. Solar and wind will not suffice.
Thorium is the future - at least until we have a reliable fusion reactor.
Look it up.
Nuclear does not come in only one flavor.