Re: Only two sides?
"Life is rarely that simple"
Indeed. Unfortunately, experience says that if you try to describe ten sides or more, people lose interest and can't follow the arguments.
We need a better education system.
16763 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Not sure I agree with that. The gaming industry is constituted of a handful of giant powerhouses and a sea of small shops struggling to survive and thrive.
When Microsoft acquired Mojang, it absorbed one of the small guys who had become successful, thus diminishing the amount of talent (and competition) that existed in the market. That is not a factor that improves the robustness of the market.
If Microsoft continues to acquire any and every house of any success, then the market will be down to whatever the top three are today. That won't make for a very dynamic industry.
I would think the reverse : phone only switched on at home or at the office.
The goverment already has that data from other sources. Where you go, on the other hand, should be your own private business, unless there's an emergency.
A cable is a cable. It's a bit of wire with certain mechanical properties, mainly, the ability to transfer current.
Our technology allows us to modulate that current to transfer data, but that has nothing to do with the cable and everything to do with the bits the cable is plugged into.
So, what is the difference between an "active" and a "passive" cable, given that the cable isn't given the choice ?
I had my FTTH line snagged by the local farmer's tractor - don't ask me how but apparently it had been installed a bit low on the pole across the street.
The line was intact, but it was on the ground. So I still had my connection, but the line was on the ground.
I had to explain three times to the helpdesk drone before he got the message. The line is intact, yes, but it is physically on the ground. Please come and hang it back up again.
I even got a visit from an actualy supervisor (yes, in person) who came to check on the situation.
Didn't make any difference though, they left it on the ground until some vehicle passed and wrecked it a month later. Oh, then they were there in two days to redo the whole installation.
So how could I explain this to an AI bot when actual humans took an hour to understand and then still didn't do anything until the line was actually physically cut ?
Here's some professional advice for free : don't.
Only time will tell ? Really ?
It's been well-nigh 14 years since BitCoin started burning the world and nothing good has come of it, or any of its siblings, since.
However, the number of exchanges run by crooks or idiots has been revealed to be, well, practically all of them.
This is a case where you should actually throw the baby out with the bathwater.
It seems that Tiversa was a front for a bunch of miscreants playing "ethical" hackers, but with the intent of extracting money from another bunch of incompetents pretending to do medical analysis.
Smells like Theranos. It would seem that this is a trend.
In any case, I'll be enjoying the popcorn.
I'm sorry, when was that promised ? I don't recall ever hearing that AWS was compatible with Azure or anything else.
Yes, that is becoming a requirement now, especially since businesses are losing their brains and flocking to someone else's server to host their business-critical data, but that was never mentioned when AWS, Azure or anything else starting building the business.
An interesting idea, but one that is probably going to have to wait a few years before being useful.
And I mean, a few years after it is in orbit.
I don't think that todays' satellites are capable of being refueled - but I don't know for sure. Once the orbital station is in place and has published its fueling procedure, maybe satellite makers can take that into account but, today, nobody has planned for that and planning is everything where a satellite is concerned.
It's a good idea, for sure, but I have the feeling the company is going to need to survive at least twenty years before actually starting to make any money.
I'm starting to think that there are a few other areas that should be off limits to politicians.
Like state policy, for starters.
Let's just say we keep them around for visiting politicians from other countries, or to send them off to visit politicans in other countries.
They know how to hold a glass of wine, and that's about it.
The explanation is simple : human stupidity.
Try explaining why France has a nuclear industry that hasn't experienced any such incident.
If nuclear was that dangerous, there would be whole portions of countries that would not be inhabitable.
Go educate yourself on Tchernobyl before spouting such nonsense.
Digital payment giant ?
Never heard of it.
Given that its founder is also the founder of Twitter, I'm not surprised about this breach. He was too busy tweeting to actually run his company.
No pity from me. You get the big salary, you accept the responsibility of your failure.
This is an abomination in principle.
It allows companies to not do the required effort to secure their systems, and instead get compensated for their lack of effort when disaster strikes.
This should not be allowed. We're not talking about a building ruined by an earthquake. Hacking is not an unforseeable event. It is ongoing and constant.
There should not be insurance on that. Do your job and secure your servers.
No, they don't.
Companies do not make law. Any and every company is subject to an FBI search warrant, if it comes to that, and there is no company (no, not even you, Apple) that has the right to barge into my house and search for whatever it wants.
Companies do lobby, and I do worry about the extent of their influence in that arena, but they have not yet bought the FBI.
And here we are again : production systems that cannot sustain their operation on their own.
It is mind-boggling that we went from a mainframe mentality where all code was documented and accounted for, to a "I'll take any piece of code that suits me from anywhere without checking" mentality and, above all, that that mentality is now, apparently, a standard.
No wonder Russian and Chinese hackers are making mint.
No, Fujitsu was awarded the contract to continue maintaining the existing system.
It's right there in the first paragraph :
"Fujitsu has been awarded a renewed contract for support and maintenance of the aging UK Police National Computer (PNC) after no other companies tendered for the work."
The fact that no one else made a bid is probably because the system is shite and nobody wants to become responsible for the impending shitstorm when the system needs to be effectively replaced.
Speak for the UK, but don't speak for Europe.
I have lived for 15 years in a solid house with air-air converters that could blow hot or cold following my settings. The equipment was Hitachi, and summers were very comfortable, as were winters (with a fireplace supplementing the heat requirements when we wanted a nice blaze).
As for dentistry, you obviously have no idea of the professionals we have in France (or Germany).
Europe in the Third World ?
Not yet - but we may be getting there.
You're talking about VPN providers. I'm pretty sure that they will be on the ball about such things because competition is fierce for them.
Apple is not a VPN provider, it is an "experience" provider. A "lifestyle" provider. It makes expensive tat and sells it at outrageous prices so those that have them feel good about themselves. Tacking on a VPN that doesn't always work is not going to hit its bottom line.
True. And that is valid world-wide.
Still, $100K for a nine month study with 15 experts ? That's around $700 per month per expert, if all the money is going to them which it logically won't be since there will be other costs.
So these experts will be working for peanuts.
Nice of them.