Looks like Curiosity did it again
Poor little kitty.
16737 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
Sure.
Here's a warning to Microsoft : you do not dictate how millions of your customers work.
You've already tried and failed before. I expect you will fail again, big time. Millions of companies have processes that depend on COM + Outlook. You pull that rug out from beneath them and you're looking for massive pain in the PR department, and, who knows ? That just might be the drop that pushes a fair portion to other solutions. Mail + COM is not entirely unfeasible in the Open Source area. there's going to be a lot of upheaval by 2029.
You keep on acting as if you dictate the terms. You have erected this wall for no good reason. I'm looking forward to seeing you crashing head-first into it.
In Firefox it didn't want to go. Said "can't find MIME format" or somesuch.
Tried in Brave, no cigar. Seamonkey didn't like it either.
So I copied the URL to my work PC and tried with Chrome. Still no go.
What format are you people using for even Chrome to not agree ?
P.S. : all my browsers are up to date and have no trouble viewing videos on YouTube or elsewhere, like this one.
With my i9 10980XE, my 64GB of DDR4, my 8TB of HDDs and my GeForce RTX 4080 Panther, it would seem, from your experience, that I have a machine that can run a chatbot.
Now if you could just convince me why I would need one. I already have a wife and a cat if I wish to talk with someone, and even the cat has more brains than a chatbot.
Sorry ?
Trump, who has been bleating about how Beijing is our enemy, imposing a ridiculous trade war and blaming China for everything he can't blame Mexica for, has used a Chinese firm for one of his shady deals ?
Wow. I would say somebody alert MAGA, but they'd have to have a brain to understand.
"Leicester City Council has a good reputation for information governance, so I have some faith that the damage done in terms of sensitive data will be quite limited "
Yeah, well we're going to find out just how "limited" the damage was. Not that I wish them to languish for weeks, it's just that I doubt that their reputation is enough to get them back on their feet next week.
Roving bands of hooligans are trashing the infrastructure in preparation of the apocalypse ?
Is it safe to walk the streets in the daytime ?
Do I risk getting burned when walking by a manhole that suddenly belches flames ?
So many questions . . .
Isn't that fun ?
When I go to a hotel, I reasonably expect privacy everywhere.
I do not expect my face to show up on the hotel's Facebook page of reservations. Nor do I expect that I be found on the hotel's Facebook restaurant guest page.
I am willing to accept that there be a security cam in the garage, but that will be the extent of my understanding.
If you so much as show a pic of me wandering around in your garden, I will sue your ass off.
And he could count his blessings that day, because today there would have been a response, quickly, and then things would have escalated from there.
A massive semiconductor company, eh ? Not based in Taiwan, eh ? Sounds like Intel. Looks like Intel participated in the learning IT security paradigm.
You don't give interns superuser access to anything.
Now they know why.
Um, yeah, you can pretty much say the same about the USA.
Why is nobody remembering National Security Letters on newsdesks these days ?
Yes, Beijing can perfectly well ransack a Chinese company's data. The White House can do the same to any US-based company. I'm convinced the same is true for just about any country.
This is a pot meet kettle argument. Stop using it.
But I'm not going to go dissing on hospital stuff. I'm very happy that we have hospitals, insecure as they are. The people who are there want to help, they really do. You have to want to help when you're paid so little for saving people's lives, or even just making them slightly better. As I am getting on in age (60 is an asteroid that is looming ever larger on my horizon), I think that, if push comes to shove, I will gladly accept an insecure pump or whatever if it gives me more years to be with my family.
Yes, I would definitely prefer that medical thingamajigs be secure, it would certainly be reassuring, but I think I can stand the insecurity if my life is on the line.
But in my house ? Never.
I can get my fat ass of the couch and go for the dumb, stupid, secure switch.
I note that you haven't mentioned your weekly printing load. You just say that you use it every week.
That may be enough, but I have had years of headaches and ink loss with Epson inkjets until I finally decided to go laser, and I have never regretted that choice.
I print less than five pages a month. Laser is the only choice for that volume, inkjets will always dry up and be a nuisance.
That's a fact.
I came to this article thinking I was going to learn about someone having hacked a font, like others have hacked jpg images. What I actually learn is that there are tools to manage fonts, and it is one of those that is hackable. That is not the same thing.
Then there is the fact that the article evokes three vulnerabilities, but only describes one even though the way the article is written made me believe that I would get a description of all three.
I'm a bit miffed.
The app has nothing to do on any government's devices.
I note that we haven't heard about banks banning it on their platforms, because banks wouldn't allow users to install it in the first place. When you're working in a bank, you puny little cog do not have the right to install anything without approval from your department manager. And your department manager won't approve anything that is not for your work.
Why are governments not doing the same ? Oh, of course, IT costs money and people in government - especially politicians and their aides - don't have time to be subject to actual IT security.
Why are more employees relying on a beta service that makes stuff up ?
The only thing they're really doing is giving their time and data for free to a service which, once declared in production, will gouge them for their own work on a monthly subscriptoin basis.
It would be vastly more costly to lug a nuke to the Moon instead of parking it in Earth orbit (probably not LEO either, but much higher up).
And it's not just getting it to the Moon, it's all the infrastructure that would need to exist on-site to make it launcheable. Which means landing a whole lot of stuff beforehand that is specifically destined to launch a nuke. The kind of thing that would be quite visible, what with all the telescopes we have on Earth and in orbit, for any expert that would care to check out the installation. Which would lead to diplomatic issues that would likely make the Cuban missile crisis look like a stroll in the park in summer.
Not going to happen, is what I'm saying.
A contract is a binding agreement between both parties.
Oracle can drum up all the changes it wants, none of them are valid if nothing is allowing them in the existing contract.
That is why contract amendments are made. They add to and change the initial contract, and both parties must agree to them before they can be implemented.
And that is the essential difference between an actual contract and web site Ts & Cs. The web site can change them at any time and if you don't like it, your only choice is not to use said web site any more. You cannot argue that you wish stay on the pre-change version.
Ts & Cs are not a contract.