"we are saying they will not be fixed"
To which the proper response should be : we're not saying you're wrong, we're saying you will not be paid until they are fixed.
Why does nobody have the balls to do that ? Because nobody's going to do that.
16755 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
What kind of heat are we talking about, the heat at the center of a red giant where palladium is formed ?
Because what palladium we have mined and refined around here has been smelted, if I'm not mistaken, so it can easily hold up under several hundred degrees of heat at least.
If palladium can be destroyed by the heat of where it is created, how can there be any that exist out here ?
I'm confused now.
Ok, fine, you'd need to know how to use Wireshark, which is probably not on the list of abilities of every thief in the area, but still, this is just one more thing to add to the ever-growing list of things IoT has promised and not kept in Real Life (TM).
A bog-standard lock may not be the right solution to protect a front door, but a good, 5-point security lock is.
And you don't need to worry about the state of the batteries.
That is an impressive list of the things that are going wrong in this particular instance.
It is also a damning indictment of ICANN's attitude towards respecting its own rules. Transparency is a cornerstone of ICANN ? Really ? It may have been at one point, but if it's still there it's buried under a mountain of hypocrisy.
ICANN, bah !
It's the only country in the world where there is on average an online banking snafu every quarter and yet the inhabitants just continue using those same banks.
I've never heard of the BNP, the Credit Mutuel or the Sogenal having problems with their online banking for years. Does UK banking IT use less reliable hardware, or are UK banking IT managers just not up to the task ?
Which I will copiously ignore, since Microsoft has a proven track record of bungling everything it does aside from Office, and letting everything else go to rot.
Honestly, why anyone buys into the Microsoft "ecosphere" is beyond me. Nothing lasts outside of Office, which is now being jacked into the Cloud by every conceivable orifice.
No thanks.
Not to mention that running on Windows 1 0 requires you to accept that some update at some point in the future is going to completely bork you entire system base, and you'll have to wait for Microsoft to get its finger out and fix it - if that is possible.
It really is high time Linux comes to the desktop.
He his helping the community get the solutions to a very complex problem. Sure, he's doing it because he would prefer not to have to redo the changes for each kernel update, but still, he's trying to help everyone. That is a Good Thing (TM).
The fact remains that hyperthreading is more than 30% of your CPU performance. That's 30% I absolutely cannot do without.
Xerox promises all of this for after the merger :
"On the $2bn of "synergy savings" promised, Xerox said it will consolidate from 8,000 to 3,000 suppliers to cut costs; slash its own IT bill to 1 per cent of revenue from 4 per cent; simplify stock keeping units and beef up inventory management, as well as rationalise (ie sell off) real estate in 555 locations to cut property owning down to just 261 sites."
Why wait ? Go ahead and do all that stuff, it will help you survive a little bit longer.
All this "smart" and "connected" hoopla is cesspool of failure waiting to happen and, when (not if) it does, invariably it's the consumer that is left high and dry.
I am boycotting anything with "smart" in the name. I intend to be able to use my stuff for the long run.
We are now in the Age of the Company, which decides what the customer wants and monetizes the customer's private details for maximum revenue.
It is insane to kill off an app that people actually like using. Of course, from Microsoft's point of view, it's obviously insane to keep updating an app that can - gasp - actually work with non-Microsoft platforms.
Get with the program, Microsoft. The future is about Cloud, not platform.
I find it astounding that companies are willing to write off decades of SAP ERP investment to start over just so that they can make calculations in columns. I mean, they've been managing so far, what's the problem ?
Honestly, if my company was big enough to need SAP and I had a working system, I'd hate to budget for an entirely new system just because of a new calculation method. I know IT is all about redoing stuff, but this is pushing things a bit far.
I hope there's some other advantage that justifies spending all that money all over again.
There's a twofold reason for that : one is that companies, contrary to Microsoft, like it when their databases are accessible 24/7, thus any change is viewed with suspicion because, yes, Microsoft and others have a track record of patches breaking things. The other reason is that there aren't all that many companies that have a dev environment that mirrors the production environment exactly, thus patching the dev environment and testing is not always representative what will happen when the production environment is patched - meaning more suspicion and delays.
Because Microsoft still hasn't understood that patching your production database and then not being able to use it is something companies don't like. At all. And I just can't understand how Microsoft can write code that breaks its own effing tools. It's not like Microsoft doesn't have the ability to actually test its own stuff, but here we all are.
Well what if a security researcher does ?
Personally, if I have not activated location services, I expect my phone to not activate them on its own.
I am sick and tired of devices that do their own thing independently of what I actually told them to do.
Another reason for me not to buy Apple - not that I'm lacking any.
Things are proceeding exactly as I have foreseen.
Never going to happen.
First of all, in companies the size of Microsoft, there's always something happening that should not be known to the workforce before the appropriate time - decided by the board.
Second, there are some things that need to be kept secret. Having an employee representative is a world of possible leaks waiting to happen.
Third, do you really think these kind of people are going to want to shoulder it with a representative of the peons ? They're above that, and that's where they want to stay.
Sorry, but there was no mistake there. This was a calculated and programmed operation with a specific target market, and the people responsible for putting this in place should definitely go to jail.
And the CEO should be first in line, because that's where the buck stops.
Our society is not going get better any time soon if we can't teach the right lesson to the criminals in white collars.
"Because many of the victims are small and medium enterprises, their accounts typically don't have the same legal protections afforded to consumer accounts."
What kind of schizophrenic country allows for different levels of legal protection following what entity it is that opens a bank account ? A bank account is a bank account, whether it is held by a corporation, a person or an illegal alien from Mars.
And how ironic that corporations who can potentially lobby to have laws written in their favor have less legal banking protection than voters whose votes don't count.
"The company recommended people take the same precautions with text messages from unknown mobile numbers as they would with emails from unknown sources"
People apparently blindly accept email from unknown sources, clicking the links and forwarding as requested ; telling them to do the same with SMSs is not really a good idea.