A bit convenient?
"Its employee who bought the stolen goods has died since the thefts ceased in 2009."
This would be the Mr Smith that was on the books but worked from home which is why no-one ever saw him?
990 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Mar 2008
"for copyright owners who use the tools responsibly."
WTF? Since when has ANYONE in the history of the internet used any tools responsibly?
The next line showed me that Google are actually on the same planet as the rest of us
"Google will improve its tools for those would wish to challenge a DMCA takedown with a counter notice"
Who cares if Google are evil? At least they treat the rest of the world as equal (equally menial maybe, but still equal)
BTW Gimmi an "I earnt £934554 from the internet while I was asleep" icon
@JaitcH
"had anyone used ice picks, marbles or chile powder (horses do breath), on the horses I would have not been upset."
Which is why normal people don't complain about "plod" slapping you down.
Give yourself 10 years to lead a real life and then reread that amazing load of tripe and tell me you don't shudder.
Over 3 years that's only $50k a year so she hardly seems to be a big player in this, how come no mention of the people actually making the money out of it? or was she just the one who took the blame with the promise of a nice pay-off after leaving jail if she keeps her mouth shut?
People never mention the fact that you actually need friends to be a part of any social group.
How many people on your facebook friends list are actually friends? And why would you trust their recommendations?
How long will anyone trust a search that is in some way affected by a loose confederation of anonymous internet social network profiles?
I brought twitter followers and face book friends to help game the systems and get increased presence for some blog articles. kind of preparing the way for what may happen in 5 years or so time. Social network systems are far easier to game than Google's algo and therefore not that useful.
Surely the line "On the other hand, a medieval Facebook might have made the crusades a whole lot less bloody?" is totally incorrect?
The whole point to this story is that the weird religious types used facebook as a tool to force their oppressive views onto others.
Wasn't that the entire point of the crusades?
I reckon if we had a medieval Facebook we would have had the same affect as some of the "face book party's" you see nowadays.
Unfortunate Arab parents coming home to find their hose trashed by the Christians turning up with a free open house invitation garnered from a foolish child's facebook page.
Many people complaining about privacy laws and crying about going to court.
But when it comes down to it, nothing will happen. Look at Phorm for example, not only were BT let off by the British Police because "They didn't realise it was a crime" but the English Government refused to comment about it to good old Viviane Reding.
When these company's are doing the dirty work Governments want, then they will be above the law.
If the UK had companies with a million people employed in manual labour supplying goods to the West, then you would see security walking round with truncheon's.
We ALREADY forget all about human rights when it suits us, or when the Americans tell us too. We would act no differently to the Chinese (our uniforms would probably be better though)
If the climate sceptics are being "silenced" by the "its getting hotter!" camp, then why is no one doing anything about the actual issues?
Having a group of sceptics who have financial interests in their NOT being any impact from human actions is about as useful to the nay-sayers as a bunch of evangelical idiots is to the "its getting hotter!" camp.
It seems both sides just want their cash to buy their nice cars and pay the mortgage sod the actual problem.
Anyway, there is no problem, China will get hotter and we will just buy our stuff from them and their brutalised workforce!!!
The Western world relies on China et al treating its workers like this so we can get our cheap new mobile phones every 12 months.
We also push all our resource wasting and pollution creating industry's over there so we can stand back and let them take the blame for it.
Company's like Apple don't give company's like Foxconn contracts worth billions without knowing exactly what's going on. I use Apple, but it could be any company that has anything to do with silicon.
People can't complain or even comment when they conveniently don't give a monkeys as long as they get a new shiny toy every few months.
The average Google site takes you 3 seconds to view (do I have a new mail? no? then close the browser)
or 5 seconds to type in the keyphrase and then click off to the chosen search item the user goes, Google app now closed..
If users spent as long on Google products as they do on Facebook (for example) then the Google product would be broken.
As an aside, I doubt Google are to worried about Facebook. No one clicks on Facebook ads and the demographic viewing them don't have credit cards to play with so the revenues from them are low to none.
Just look at what is actually advertised on Facebook, its all the same stuff you used to see spammed at you in e-mails until the filers got decent.
With the kind of Authority and Pagerank of the DWP domain, they can rank for any keywords they want organically with no problem at all.
Why would they spend a penny on PPC?
DWP spent 1.1 million having to pay for CPC when it took me 30 seconds to discover they have issues with H1 tags and canonical errors on their landing page.
its a simple 10 minute task to pay a n00b to sort that out and their would go from 8th to 2 or 3rd in Google almost immediately with the speed a PR7 site is indexed
Almost 100,000 men and women from Auschwitz worked in a Siemens factory inside the camp.
They are still allowed to function as a company to this day. Money talks and always has done.
This legal case has a snowballs chance especially when you see the amount of people still doing business with Iran, China and any other questionable regime (with cash).
That's an amazing figure.
How many employees does the Beeb actually have with laptops?
For a company to loose 150 laptops and not start calling in the cops we would be looking at hundreds of thousands of users.
I have worked in company's with numbers approaching that and 10 losses rings alarm bells.
I read this article and immediately tested this out by beating the crap out of the little old lady who makes the tea in the canteen here.
Imagine my surprise when I was then unable to beat into submission the 5 coppers who arrived.
Not one to give up, I am even now whispering evil words into the ears of my cellmates hoping to build up the strength to punch my way through the walls of Wormwood Scrubs….
Typical Daily Mail response.
Take a deep breath, think about things a little bit more.
This law actually stops the scam online sales sites from (for example)
Selling a wedding dress for £300 including p&p.
Return the Wedding dress and get refunded £5
The p&p was actually £295.
There are already many laws in place that protect the seller from the "buy on aproval" aspect, if the packaging is damaged of the item is "work" then they can refuse to take it back.
The guy who said he has a ton of goods in shit condition is either full of shit himself and trying to impress the forum weirdos or an idiot who accepted something damaged back
"On average, pages in your site take 0.4 seconds to load (updated on Apr 10, 2010). This is faster than 99% of sites."
This is a site that is almost 100% high rez images.
Good webdesign should be aimed at users ability to actually ... use it.
Flash sites allways look shit anyway, if you had to have a lnk that said "bypass this" then why do you think your visiters wanted to see it in the first place?
2 years in jail vs the chance of getting that kind of cash
hmmm
What happens if he can't come up with the full amount? He must have lost a large proportion in laundering costs along the way, unless thats what hes got left over.
In which cash, he prooves crime does pay (and very nicely too)
Is that the best people can come up with?
If it can crack current encryption, then just use it to create a new key that its peers can't crack
Whats more scary is the fact that if this thing is being tested with systems its designed to learn from, then it Skynet time.
Add to this, the fact that its plugged into the heart of Google and all they control....
When Google start ordering heavy construction gear, its already too late to head to the hills.