LOL
fruity fanbois troll.
832 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Mar 2008
The fact is: successive Governments from either side of the House have failed to stop Tax Avoidance. It's been going on since the Middle Ages and it will continue to go on. The fact that this Government and the previous Labour Government have totally failed to stop it say it all. MPs are wasting their time 'grandstanding' in PACs and should be in the House passing legislation.
Full props to Troy Alstead (CFO of Starbucks) who told the MPs to, effectively, 'fuck off, it's none of your business' when asked about Starbucks' Dutch operations. He knows: 'there's nothing you can do because what we've done is perfectly legal - that's why it's called Tax Avoidance and not Tax Evasion. Try and stop us - you can't. Decades of successive Governments have all tried and failed. Yours is no different.'
"Apple has been the one losing out in the UK, forced to post a statement in newspapers and on its website stating that Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 does not copy its iPad."
1. Apple's 'loss' applies to the whole of the EU, not just the UK.
2. The iPad had nothing to do with the Court case as the Judges were at pains to point out.
Going from a device with no moving parts to one with moving parts?
Going from a device with no noisy fan to one with a noisy fan?
WTF? This is sooooooooooooo retro, I'm staggered to believe it.
This is further proof that Apple have lost their way since Steve Jobs died.
Tim Cock is not doing a good job and should be fired.
Android is winning. People allover the world have spoken with their £££s... and they want Android!
While the Jihadi Apple Corp. continues to lose respect from all good people, Android is gaining in stature. And market share.
Meanwhile, Microsoft clutches its Win8 bog-brush and continues to work hard cleaning public lavatories.
Android WIN!
You are correct. Apple are losing left, right and centre(er?). Losing Court cases. Losing market share. Losing respect.
Meanwhile, Android is winning. Winning market share. Winning Court cases. Winning the hearts and minds of good people all over the world.
When Samsung wins its US appeal - thereby overturning the demonic jury decision - it will be the final nail in the coffin of Apple's misguided Jihad.
With Apple fast gaining a reputation for not innovating, Apple will ultimately lose this war of their own making and the world will revert back to a peaceful place with Google reigning supreme and Microsoft cleaning the toilets.
I don't agree with that viewpoint.
I believe politicians would squander any additional revenues they gained.
They've been caught with their snouts in the trough over expense claims.
Any additional funds would be used to buy votes from the electorate and WOULD NOT be passed back to the PAYE taxpayer. Anyone who thinks they would is deluded.
Full props to the HMRC for pointing out that they are NOT going to be the Government's Whipping Boy.
MPs can complain all they like but only they make the laws. Their constant calls of 'immorality' is yet another indication of their inherent incapability to acknowledge their own failings. Just like expense claims, politicians will always try to deflect any valid criticim against them by trying to divert public attention from the real issue: their incompetence.
This sort of thing (tax evasion) has been going on for decades under successive Governments - both Labour and Conservative. To 'cry foul' now is complete hypocrisy.
"Practically". I love that. It reminds me of Larry Ellison's quote "We're number one in applications, behind SAP". ie. they're not #1, they're #2.
The same goes for this quote. "We practically sold out of iPad Minis." ie. They didn't sell out of iPad Minis. That's all that can be inferred from the quote.
Full congratulations to the author. He/she has been very generous to Apple and in no way apologises for their product.
Never has an Apple product (ie. the iPad Mini) been so unkindly received by the media and the tech community.
This review is the personification of King Canute.
Yes, because that's what they were told to say and that's what the Court case was about.
One of the tragedies is Apple's implicit (and the Media's actual) attribution of the soundbite "It is a cool design" to the iPad.
If you read Judge Birss's judgement - he wasn't talking AT ALL about the iPad, he was talking entirely about the Registered Design, in particular, the diagrams in Appendix A of the judgement.
The perversion is, If you look at those diagrams, even the iPad, iPad2 and iPad3 don't conform 100% to the Registered Design. Apple was (counter) suing over the Registered Design which, in law, has nothing to do with their iPad models. Sadly, that didn't stop the media (incl. El Reg) from swallowing the soundbite.
Judges are not stupid. To be a judge you do, actually, have to be very intelligent and understand the law. I believe Judge Briss QC selected his words very carefully to justify a 'policy decision'. He new the media would lap them up and this would deflect attention away from the decision he was making on the grounds of policy: to grant in favour of Apple would be to grant a patent on a rectangle with rounded corners and thereby set a dangerous precedent that would hinder competition.
Possibly.
If you read the Court Of Appeal decision, at paragraphs 81-84:
"...[the publicity order] is not to punish the party concerned for its behavoir. Nor is it to make it grovel - simply to lose face. The test is whether there is a need to dispel commercial uncertainty... Apple itself must (having created the confusion) make the position clear: that it acknowledges that the court has decided that these Samsung products do not infringe its registered design. The acknowledgement must come from the horse's mouth. Nothing short of that will be sure to do the job completely."
Given Apple's continued childish behaviour towards the Court, I can't help but think the Court may decide to put Apple "on the naughty step" and require it to post the notice 'above the fold' so to speak.
I hope that happens.
If ever there was an example of the cliche, the media's love affair with Linus Torvalds exemplifies it. Here we have yet another quote which is merely the personal view of one man.
Yes, opinions are like assholes. Yes, everyone has got an asshole.
Why not quote these facts instead?
With the Australian economy about to tank, I cannot help but think this is a simple job-creation exercise by the unpopular encumbant Government (are Governments ever popular?) to sure up the voters. I fail to see how any perceived 'benefit' will outweight the inqury's cost and am left feeling it is a gross misuse of public funds that typifies the maxim "the public get the politicians they deserve".
With such a blatant raid on the public purse, I cannot help but think "has Australia ever really left its Convict past?"
With commodity prices falling, China cutting back on orders for raw materials and an overblown property bubble about to burst (or has it started alread - Banksia?) I worry for my Australia colleagues as they are about to enter the abyss that will be their worst recession on record.
I tried WinPho 7 and I kinda liked it - until I tried to use it as a temporary storage device. It was shit. Then they announced WinPho8 won't be compatible with WinPho7 handsets. I felt violated.
If someone wants to give me a WinPho8 I'll gladly test it out. But there's no way I'm going to stump up my own £££s to buy one. Once bitten...
...mine hasn't.
While the 'cyclone' tech stuff still works, it's the other non-design stuff (hose, wheels, etc.) that continues to split, fall-off, break, etc.
I've been through two Dyson vacuum cleaners and I'm still not convinced of the £££ premium they cost. Bosch currently make better value gear.
...after Microsoft gave the BBC Journo's Surface Tablets. To keep.
This is industry standard. Remember the 'Celebrity' 'Changing Rooms' of the 2000s? The one where the 'Celebrity' got a free new kitchen/bathroom/whatever they wanted just so long as they lent their 'celebrity' to the camera crew?
It's the same at the BBC. People are people. You scratch their back, they'll scratch yours. BBC journo's are no different (apart from a shared predisposition to voting Labour).
AsApple wanted the war and I dare say they're going to lose it. LMAO. Britain, Germany, Netherlands.... and then there's the US Appeal Case.
Samsung can't lose. They have a fast turnaround-to-market model. As reported elsewhere, they've already re-coded TouchWiz so it no longer infringes on the Patents Apple claims it did. And what's Apple done? Release an iPhone 4S with a big screen and a failed Map app and now a non-retina display iPad Mini. Jesus-H-Christ. So much for any claim to 'innovation'. Since Steve Jobs died Apple has been on a slippery slope. They've reached the top (in stock market capitalisation) and so it's all down-hill from here....