OSS Rev. n+1
<yawn> BFD
1445 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Feb 2008
Dunno, but I've been getting automatic updates for the 2+ years I've been using Firefox exclusively. I always install the IE Tab add-on and everything has always just worked as if I were using IE.
I guess that last statement is really not true since I don't use IE at all ... ever. Let's just say FF with IE Tab works 100% of the time for me.
The USofA Govern-ment has maintained, for as long as the records have been kept, there is always a certain level of acceptable. i.e. "good" unemployment: new college grads, those between jobs, and other "acceptable" reasons for not working. That percentage has always hovered around 3-3.5%. There have been no changes to this percentage in recent months and there shouldn't have been.
7.6%(total unemployed) - 3.5%(acceptable unemployed) = 4.1% (those available for work who aren't working).
100% - 4.1% (those available for work who aren't working) = 95.9% (those available for work who are actually employed and getting paid)
I'd say 95.9% (those available for work who are actually employed and getting paid) is pretty damn good. During the depression in the USofA the unemployed rate peaked at 24.75% in 1933. Or, from the other direction, the EMPLOYMENT rate was an adjusted 78.75% in 1933. 95.9% current EMPLOYMENT rate today in the USofA is still looking pretty damn good.
Of course there will be those who will quibble with the 3-3.5% "good" unemployment but no matter. The logic is still the same and the current EMPLOYMENT rate in the good old USofA is still damn good.
Noted: a low heart attack rate among those who live a certain lifestyle is of no comfort to the individual in that lifestyle who just suffered a terminal Coronary Event. But then I'm talking population raes and not individuals. It does no good to tell a laid-off GM assembly plant worker the national EMPLOYMENT rate is 95.9% so he should be happy, Doesn't work that way, but 95.9% is still frakking good.
... when my belief system gets dented.
Torvalds warns of Windows 7 threat
Might make Windows sing again
By Nick Farrell
Monday, 26 January 2009, 10:07
WINDOWS 7 might create the rebirth of Microsoft OS, which was blighted by the release of its Vista operating system, according to Open Sauce guru Linus Torvalds.
In an interview with Computerworld, Torvalds said that Windows 7 is better than Vista and the Vole may have a huge PR advantage as people will compare it to Vista and think it is good so, "angels will sing again." This is what happened with Windows 95 compared to Windows 3.1.
He thinks that Microsoft may have even done this on purpose.
The Vole realised the Windows development cycle is way too long and it would be insane to do that again, however they might aim for a two-year development cycle and Torvalds think that is too long.
Torvalds thinks that Vole should disconnect the operating system from the applications and release products sooner.
He said for Linux six months is quite tight and the bits that are thrown together sometimes don't work properly.. However an annual release cycle is a reasonable cycle for doing a whole distribution.
Microsoft wanted people to rent the software, but users don't want to. If you do development over five years and make so many changes it is more painful for the user. The cost of the pain is likely to be higher than the cost of the operating system which is why people are slow to upgrade, he said. µ
All sixty-nine of you fanatics need to pay attention
... the story's position is correct. Linux is the Betamax of the OS world. Time will certainly tell and so far Linux is just not where its gurus want it to be. If it were, all the bluster, hype, and hurt feelings wouldn't be there. You can tell something is a failure by the amount of hot air surrounding it. Shakespeare perhaps put it best when he penned, "The lady doth protest too much".
But we'll see and if history shows us anything, it's that all these same rebuttals will be repeated in five years, ten years ... oh you see what I mean.
But I and others can certainly be wrong, but for now Linux is an also-ran per the numbers. And in today's market driven societies (as opposed to tech driven) those numbers are all that really count.
Oh we have to protect those who can't think for themselves and get off they fat, lazy asses to do a little planning.
In fact, if we have to we'll bomb certain people to save them.
Frakk 'em. We act as though they'll die without TV for a week or two while they do their best impression of responsible adults and get what they need.
My old Seagate 80 and 160 GB drives just keep on a-hummin'. Until, that is, they fail for some other reason like 20% already have.
ALL things mechanical fail and the solution is: Backup, Backup, Backup. Any scheme should include a backup to a media type other than your primary storage type and off-site storage is usually a pretty good idea.
... the miracle was all those good things you named coming together with the right person at the right time. Safe landings are of course not a miracle ... to modern man. But to say because there was technology and training involved there was no miracle is to deny what put all those wonderful things into play.
You're right, the use of good engineering, good technology and good training may not be a miracle, but maybe their very essence is. Maybe our growing understanding of them and their proper usage is.
But, I guess for you ultra techy types whose very life and livelihood are vested in the tech industry have to take the stance you, the author took. If you don't push the tech and toys, and be successful at it, you're out of a job. My generation calls that selling oneself to the devil.
Military minds (not necessarily brains) generally assess combat situations with the opponent at their very best and themselves at their very worse. With that in mind, any new weapon will always be at a "tactical disadvantage". That's just the way it done. A system like that has the usual outcome of breeding better soldiers, systems, and etc.
We'll never really know until the neat air war opens, but if you'd like to get a flavor of near real world results goto: http://www.acc.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123041725
You might find flaws with the approach, but with the Raptors flying the same exact sorties as other craft, the Raptors lost only one encounter. I think the final numbers were Raptor kills 244, "The Enemy" 1.
My earlier post concerning their reduced warranty period:
"They were losing their butts by warrantying drives good for 3 years (or less) for 5 years. Simple solution, don't improve the drives, cut the warranty period. Typical corporate response."
Looks to me they are getting what they deserve. Unfortunately buyers are not getting what they deserve. I stopped buying Seagate months ago, and I'm so glad. Well, glad until my current maker of choice does the same thing Seagate has done.
Oh yeah, right. I tell you what, when usage numbers of all Linux distros combined becomes equal to, or greater than, Windows usage, I'll agree with you. But up until that point, all you have is opinion and bluster.
It's the numbers dude, it's the numbers. And hard as you and others might try, Linux is a distant "also ran" at this point. It might be the greatest thing since sliced bread, but as long as all you have is words in the air and no hard usage figures to prove your position you have nothing.
<end of thread>
Well let's see. The Linux community has been hollerin' fer years their style OS is fit for the masses. I rectum that jus ain't necessarily so huh? Of course it's not Linux's fault, nooooooooo, it's the woman's fault for being so backward and possessing such poor computer skills and not paying attention to what she was orderin'. Of course Ubuntu is a "human" OS so maybe she jus ain't fully human herself or somthin'.
The Lord must love the common person, 'cause, well, there's a world full of 'em and it just ain't gettin' no better.
I know the Linux community will fuss and fume and just have all sorts of comments that this is an isolated case an generalizations aren't invalid. Standby little Penguin, your personal devil is here. And little fellow, its number is not 666, it's 7.
As a former budget person, now retired, at one of the USofA's largest corporations, I can assure you budget is THE issue today. The truth is it has been for the last two decades if not longer. Right or wrong, low cost clerical personnel are generally the first to go closely followed by IT projects. In reality it may be a different scenario at different companies, buy IT is generally "low hanging fruit" for the accounting/budget trolls like I was.
Right or wrong, that's the way it is. Bad management is certainly a problem. But bad management tactics to help themselves look better is to "get costs out of the business" which has the effect (hopefully) of lowering expenses and raising net income, growing the company and increasing stockholder worth.
This moron is incapable of seeing reality; he has risen to his level of incompetence and roosts there like so many other corporate executives. It's goons like him who have contributed so much to the global economic morass we're in.
Paris because I bet she likes a side show in the zoo's monkey house.