Posts by Sarah Bee

Re: RE:Re: I'm all for women only carriages...

'Maybe just maybe', eh? What exactly are you implying here? Could you explain it to me like I'm, say, a silly girl?

Honestly, what a bunch you are.

Re: IT Angle?

Oh, put a bung in it.

Re: I said I'd never read another BoFH

So you're saying that if you have to wait for the next one, you won't read it when it turns up?

Um, I admire your spirited stand and all, but I don't believe you.

Re: eh?

Not you, AC.

(Plonker.)

Re: And the IT angle is?

The IT angle hangs to the left.

When will you people stop?

Re: El Reg to sponsor Salem Witch Trial 2.0

Hey, HEY, who made me the saviour of decency, sunshine?

Oh right, yes, I suppose.

Well... it's not very nice, no, but I think we're relatively non-evil, actually, on stuff like this. A quick Google of Brian Peppers will show you what happens when the internet decides to dogpile some poor bastard (who may or may not have done anything but has certainly been dealt a lousy hand by life).

Meanwhile, there are suggestions that in fact, ugly people do commit more crime. It's genuinely interesting, if uncomfortable.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/02/18/MNGRIHAT6I1.DTL

Re: common sense ???

Why would you equate Reg mods with the authorities? Don't be daft. I'd rather not deal with the inevitable crap this is going to cause but I'm not going to give in to your persecution fantasies by rejecting your comment. It's a valid opinion and you didn't say a big rude word. Go ahead.

The rest of you - try and be sort of nice and only throw soft objects, please.

Re: Err ok...

You seem to know quite a lot about these things, Ian - would you like to be our sex toy correspondent? (NB There is no opening for a sex toy correspondent. Yes I said 'opening'. Isn't that funny.)

The IT angle, further to your enquiry, has to be just right or the whole experience is entirely disappointing.

Re: @AC 12:29

>Sure, everyone was happy to phone the TFL help line to find out when their train was leaving because they didn't have a decent app to look times up.

Actually the helpline is more accurate than the clusterfuck of a website and the iPhone app doesn't seem to be any better. My mate looked up the last train from his place on his iPhone - I rang the helpline. They disagreed over the times by about an hour. The helpline was correct.

I'm not sure everyone's life is miserable because they're on one side of your list and not the other. Just saying, like.

Re: Ah, good

See also: kids named after products, labels or designers. I heard a mother yell "DOL-CHAYY!" at her toddler once in Woolies. I didn't hang around to see if any of her other kids were called Gabana, or Gucci.

I suppose once you get children showing up with 'Reebok Heskelthwaite' on their name tags you're obliged to call the police.

Re: In other news....

PR company may have shot self in foot since more readers are likely to think "Ooh I quite fancy a Jaffa Cake" rather than the brand in question which most will have overlooked.

Register reader reads clearly frivolous item, complains.

Million billion commentards point out that the Jaffa Cake is a cake not a biscuit by law.

Moderatrix wonders if it's too early to start on the bourbon.

Re: May I be the (probably) 52nd to say

Just to let you know I am allowing through each and every 'armless' post in order to celebrate the wonderful diversity and creativity of our community. Some days I'm just so proud to be a part of it.

Re: Do some research before writing an article please..

Read the article before writing a patronising comment please.

Re: I remember this.

This small individual pork and pickle pie is for you, KLE.

Re: bleh

Hoooo boy, that's my afternoon taken care of, then.

Could I just ask a) if you imagine this kind of escalation occurs with the majority of people who look at porn, and b) what possible harm owning or ooking at a picture of something does that necessitates the prosecution of the viewer?

Also, define 'unhealthy interest', if you would.

Any rational person should be able to see that this law is an immoral farce. Oh, and if the government actually cared about animal welfare they would sort out DEFRA, the Dangerous Dogs Act and any number of other badnesses which cause actual quantifiable suffering. It's wall-to-wall bullshit.

Re: Whats the IT angle?

It's perpendicular to the angle of your man-cleavage, duhh.

Re: JACWM: Just Another Coyote With Mange

Yeah, whaddya know, people are drama-queen morons. You only need to see an urban fox with a bit of mange to be able to figure this one out. Or indeed those pics.

But hey, we all need a bit of excitement in our lives, so far be it from me. Woo! Baldy mythic beasts! See the evidence! Wow!

Sigh.

Re: @Dodgy Dave, AC(26th August 2009 20:23 GMT), deegee

Let that one through, John, but could you trim it a bit next time? My scrolling finger has fallen off. Ta.

Re: @AC chumps

I wasn't here, but I am now. So.

Re: I wish!, @AC

>>I've never met a woman who didn't want to communicate my to death.

I'm happy to do my bit to redress the balance by ignoring you from hereon in.

Re: winshite

>>personally i hate the ignorant twats that seem to inhabit london

How enlightened of you, dear.

Re: What?

What?

Re: Why the emotive tone?

1) Shill. You mean shill.

2) Surely you know by now that we hate everyone equally?

Re: Breasts not Sexual ... WTF ??

Oh dear, one appears to have failed at staying out of it.

Must try harder.

Re: Hrm...

>>But then...where do those who believe in Islam on a casual basis stand?

Er, outside of Islam, I would think. It's kind of one of those all-or-nothing things.

I'm pleased to see intelligent debate has broken through. The world is quite stupid enough.

Re: Time to monitor those packets

>>If i knew of anyone that even *wanted* to watch this stuff

I love the smell of thought crime in the morning.

tsk

This argument is beyond ridiculous. Just stop it. None of this stuff is remotely important.

Now go out and smell a goddamn flower, you loons.

Re: what if you're on the edge of the borough?

I'm not seeing much of the benefit of the tarting-up of Walthamstow. I think they are spending it all on cake.

Re: Ah, childhood days

You must be very proud, AC (I still know who you are, though - silence bribes to the usual address).

Yes, I'm back, and you had all better behave as I am nice and relaxed after my hols and am not having you lot arse that up.

Re: Fukwits!

Aw. I love it when you guys get all fluffy and non-judgemental and gentle as kittens. I mean, I'm welling up here. It's just so *sweet*. And clever, too.

Re: Wait a sec

Good luck with that, AC.

Re: @ ElNumbre

Yes, clearly you lot are all about the advancement of human furthering. And! the humanising of further advancing.

I think some of you lot have your pretentions to saving the world from itself, no? It's the internet after all. But yes, it's still a far cry from Twitter. Anyway, I think all El Reg commentards and Twitterers should grease up and fight to the death. Not to decide who's furthering human furthersomeness further or anything, just because the world might be a more agreeable place.

La la!

Re: Sue first...

>We're a sue first, ask questions later kind of an <del>country</del> organization...

>Here in Germany, for that statement alone the lawsuit would be thrown out and that comapny fined for abuse of the law.

I'm sure there in America they wouldn't appreciate you tarring the entire country with the same litigious brush. I mean, they'd probably sue you, etc.

Seriously, though, bit less of the extrapolation? Ta.

Re: @Mr Ian @AC @Mectron

Alright, group hug, boys, C'mon. Don't be shy.

And er, don't wish death on each other here, 'kay? 'Kay.

This is officially Be A Tiny Bit More Buddhist About Things Wednesday. I'm not at home to Mr Aggro.

Re: @ John Dee

One more time - feminism does not equate to misandry. Most people who want a better deal for one group do not want that at the expense of another. And so it follows you can be pro-men's rights without being anti-women, because they're not all anti-men (even if some of them are). Can't you?

Being anti- any group in particular, wholesale, is always bullshit and helps no one. And if you think a group is anti-you, why be anti-them in return? You're only sinking to their level. If you feel they are unfairly condemning you as a member of a group, you'll only be doing the same thing. Most people are decent and they want a fairer and better world where everyone is happier just like you do. There are problems with individuals and with cultures and societies, yeah, but you've got to identify them correctly and focus on them and not make vast sweeping statements and consider that the end of it.

Boy oh boy. This really isn't the place to do this, is it.