Re: @Tom Maddox
'Pet peeve' is a specific irritant of mine.
2823 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Jan 2008
You think it's one (ONE!), Runcible? One is only representative of a legion. I was referring to everyone who has ever whined about the lack of IT angle, and believe me there are a bunch of 'em. (Or was I referring to the commentards in general, at least the irritating/whiny/repetitious/belligerent/condescending ones? Who can say?)
I believe the substitution of a part for the whole, or vice versa, is in fact a synecdoche. It's so legit it has its own big word. So there.
The enervation has accumulated, Mouse, it's built up steadily over the last 18 months or so. And it did have a fairly good base even before that.
Anyway, never mind, this story is officially the greatest story of all time. OF ALL TIME.
What the heck does your face have to do with IT and computing, Carl 4?
For the last time. THIS IS THE BOOTNOTES SECTION. IT IS FOR SILLY AND AMUSING STUFF AND HAS BEEN FOR MANY YEARS. IT IS INTENDED AS A LITTLE LIGHT NEWS SORBET TO REFRESH YOUR BRAIN BETWEEN STORAGE AND SECURITY. SAVVY?
By Christ you people are enervating.
Well, it seems fairly obvious to me. Of course mindless careless shagging around is not unlikely to make you miserable if not actually sick, although it may work for some - if you're responsible in your promiscuity and don't spread nasties or produce unwanted children then it's up to you to behave how the hell you want. Society- or tradition- or religion-enforced celibacy is wrong - the freedom of choice to have sex or not is correct.
No?
Alright, let me put it another way - OP, don't be an internet tough guy and start smugly throwing around suggestions about offing politicians, no matter how odious. It makes you sound like a nutcase. I'm not having that any more than I'm having hilarious prison rape quips in the threads.
So think on.
Crack makes users super-horny though, doesn't it?
Being on drugs, as far as I know, is not just like being drunk only more so. And they do tend to vary quite a lot. Some make you sleepy. Some make you crazy. Some make you want to give everyone a great big cuddle. And some make you want to say hi to your monster at inappropriate moments.
You know perfectly well that it's used as a pejorative, AC, and I'm moderating them out because most of the posts using it in this context are not going to be very edifying. Besides, it's rhyming slang for another term people find insulting, so you don't get out of it that way.
Let me get that coat for you. Is this your umbrella here too?
I know it's futile, because once you've got the bit between your teeth there's no stopping you, but please try not to descend into international mud-slinging. America as a nation seems quite fond of guns. Britain does not. The US and the UK have done heroic things and horrendous things. Yeah? Yeah.
Any more mention of septics or limeys isn't getting through, you've had your fun. Try and discuss things without resorting to lame insults.
It's not a 'brown trousers moment'. It's just that the reporter decided to wear brown trousers, and put it on Twitter because you tell Twitter what trousers you are wearing because that is the nature of Twitter.
Bee: Sitting at my desk drinking water. I think I'll put the fan on.
And so forth.
See, this is the moderator's conundrum - how to allow people to respond fairly to others but not let it descend into girlie fisticuffs.
Less of the direct insults, please?
Macs *are* expensive. I have no particular loyalty, and would probably get a Mac if I could afford one. But I can't. Anyway, as you were.
"Quietly edited"? Yes. Should I have done it loudly?
I had to moderate approximately 60 comments this morning pointing out that one snafu. It was fun to read all the variations, until I became aware of the sound of someone sobbing with a strange animal tone, and then realised it was me.
Interestingly, at least ten of these leapt to the conclusion it was a deliberate dick move on the part of Microsoft to make it difficult for UK students to get the discount.
1) T-shirt boy... aw. Eight years and you're still sore about it. You need to work through this and let it go. It's hard, but you can do it. (Or you could email him. He'll probably give you the t-shirt off his own back, eh Andrew?)
2) I don't know why people feel the need to actually wish horrible death on celebrities. What's all this elaborate Lily Allen torture? Christ. I wished terrible things on postal workers and estate agents this week (they've actually affected my life, while I'm not sure I believe Lily Allen has done anything to inconvenience or aggrieve you) but then I took it back, because I realised that it's Not Very Nice.
3) Everything needs comments now because readers have a certain sense of entitlement about an instant right of reply - not only that but a right to publication. Fine. I'd say I can't complain because it keeps me in work, but Moderator is not what it says on my job contract, so I can't really say that. But journalism is not necessarily preaching, journalists and readers are not automatically in opposition... and you'll be sorry when all articles consist of a title explaining the subject and the words "What do you think? Why don't you tell us what you Reckon?"
And so will I.
Now, back on topic, bitches.
Orlowski invites emails, in which format he is happy to accept any criticism, because he prefers sensible debate to the gibbon food-fight of comments.
Besides the management have agreed that I need the odd thread off, because they are frightened that one day I will snap and go on a kill-crazy rampage with a blunt kitchen knife.