Posts by Sarah Bee

Re: Re: "Not one indiviual or unique thought amongst the lot of them."

I meant about the irony. Because it is. It's ironic.

Re: "Not one indiviual or unique thought amongst the lot of them."

It's a fucking good point.

It's probably a good time to remind you all that I seek and destroy all comments including the word 'sheeple'.

Re: +1

He's a very successful bitter old man if that's what he is.

It's odd how when people virulently criticise something, others line up to accuse them of bitterness or jealousy (or, if they're a woman, being uncontrollably hormonal, obviously). Very often it's just pure exasperation at mediocrity or inadequacy or crapitude, with no agenda or personal issues attached. This does exist as a force in the universe, you know.

Re: When I want a kitchen deisgn that will cost me millions....

Well, you lot all vented about it as if people care what you think - why shouldn't he? I want to know what Will Self thinks about the Olympic mascots. Even if no one asked him. Especially if no one asked him.

Re: The Proof Of The Pudding

You may or may not be correct, but I am duty bound to refer you to Bee's Razor: No one cares what's in your book.

Re: Drawing Mohammed

Yes, Andus, that comment was so controversial that I accidentally published it as I reeled in shock.

Re: But

Yes because it's the same as my last name! Amazing!

Re: dont get annoyed

We've done news on this subject before. It's science news. The Reg covers matters other than IT and always has.

Sigh.

Re: @Rob Dobs

Are you qualified to make a diagnosis of psychological damage? No? Well shush then, you big blouse.

Re: @Sara

I rejected it in the interests of trying to keep the scrapping to a minimum, jlocke, it's not a reflection on whether I think you're right or not.

For future ref, it's Sarah, not Sara. Ta (rah).

Re: Unbe-fuc*king-lievable!

A staffy isn't necessarily a dangerous dog, you prat. All kinds of people keep them as pets, some of whom are aggressive idiots like this one, and I think he was probably doing quite well with the intimidation on his own without the dog.

You're having a bit of a week, aren't you?

Re: So lets say....

If I have to read one more fuckforsaken, erroneous analogy about burglary in reference to this or anything, I swear I'll do time.

Re: Apologies for the spelling.

Have you ever, like, met another human being?

You all talk as if you're infallible. It's hilarious. No, wait, it's absurd.

Re: Nice one Sarah

With threads like this one I let pretty much everything through so you can all see each other's naked nastiness and compare it with your own. I know how much you like that.

If anyone has any further dazzling insight on this grave matter, best blurt it out now because I'm closing this fucker after another 15 comments. If in your haste you neglect the niceties of grammar or don't bother engaging your brain, well, that's just spiffy.

Re: Loosing her job and needing medical treatment?

People can get very upset when their marriages break down for whatever reason, and the resulting state they get into can lead to other problems such as the loss of their job in a sort of snowball effect. Medical treatment isn't uncommon in such circumstances. I suppose this is either difficult for you to understand, or you can't be arsed because it's less fun.

BTW, 'losing', you silly arse.

Re: Grief...

Fucking hell, Andus.

Re: Halogen lamps?

"I've grown dope in my house but I don't like to talk about it on the internet."

I should have put a bet on with myself as to how many expert comments would show up. I'm still going to pay myself this donut, anyway.

Re: Squids-in

Ah, y'see the fact that two of you made the same joke makes it a less good joke. But I suppose you can have cake too, it's still a cut above the usual flaming orphanages that pass for LOL-fodder around here.

Re: huh?

The rage is building. You lot had better stay out of my way today.

The Reg has always run political stories often sans IT angle. This is because even IT workers live in the world, although sometimes it seems dubious to assert this. If you don't like it, you can vote with your feet, no?

Re: The title is required, and must contain letters and/or digits.

How is that sexist? No, don't try and explain it to me, I wouldn't understand, for obvious reasons.