Posts by Sarah Bee

Re: Who the hell do you think you are?!

OK. You're done now. I'm stopping this scrap. You can have it elsewhere.

Re: Jeezuz, Haitch, El Reg. ...

Please stop griping about every rejection, and stop being insulting, or I will zap you.

Re: doublethink

Oh yes, shit, we totally forgot to add "HOW MUCH???!!!!" in there. A grievous oversight.

I've got a second-hand Macbook, which I bought with five magic beans.

Re: But

Wow. When I finally snap and murder a commentard, I want you to defend me, Andrew. Your reasoning is impeccable. I bet you'd get the poor bugger's family sent down for glaring at me in court.

Re: Would said Eye-Slammo Turrists have problems if the mobile

I love it when people get all, "If you reject this comment, well, there will be consequences". As if it's so intensely controversial that I'll sit here sweating when it comes up in the queue.

I don't have a god, anyway. But thanks!

Re: Eh?

Letters get edited.

Re: Who's with me?

That's because you're bourgeois.

Re: @Lewis

I love how you just got to the point right at the end there and kind of negated your entire post.

Politics is to the Reg as stupidity is to the comments. You'll never see an end to either.

Re: A library card bookmarks the*

"reverse mysogyny"

Well, that's an interesting reading of it. I think the women are more or less equally fallible and there's no suggestion that Homer is somehow in thrall to matriarchy, but if that's how you see it, I'll look forward to your paper on the matter.

And you mean 'misandry'. Sounds like it might be a handy word for you to incorporate into your vocabulary. You're welcome.

Re: "Open door" analogy is inadequate.

Ah but what if it's a CAR that you leave outside your house etc etc etc

Re: Well now...

But it is a children's film... that's what Lucas set out to make. Same as Harry Potter is a children's book. Innit.

Sorry.

Re: @ Sarah 1440

You wouldn't have had a happy time of it. I was very, very angry.

Re: "Police stop man and find he is not wanted."

I know, I felt a bit sorry for him myself.

Re: Endangered

If you're serious then you're awesomely ignorant. If you're not, then er, I don't get it.

Re: A few things about this ....

"Man rape"? Don't be so ridiculous.

Re: RE: What a great test . . .

I'm letting this through so I don't have to deal with any whinings about rejection, but for fucksakes stop using the ridiculous non-word 'sheeple'. It gives me a twitch. You're articulate enough to be able to put your point without resorting to that. I think it might be the nadir of language at present - it makes the misuse of 'random' sound like poetry.

Please stop, then. Thanks.

Re: Make love, not war

Ew.

Re: @Christoph

What difference does it make?

Re: there is text here shut up and look

Excuse me?

Re: Sir

Oh God I cannot imagine the original commenter was serious. We are not having this discussion. Shush.

Re: We're all screwed anyway

You may have a point but I think that's a bit of an extrapolation to make from that particular evidence.

Re: Veil not vale

Is it? Is that all, sir? Is it?

Correction is incorrect.

Re: Cause/Effect entirely wrong

And what do you do for a living, Mr Burns?

Re: Workaround

Surely this is the opposite of copyright whoring. Copyright chastity?

Re: @Sarah Bee

They don't pay me enough for me to do anything so strenuous as shilling.

Re: Give me Nigella or Dawn any day...

I appreciate the sentiment but there's no need to refer to her as a 'thing', is there? You don't have to dehumanise her just because you don't find her attractive.

Re: @Sarah Bee

Didn't surmise. Merely expressed weariness.

Re: Just one small typo

Thanks Bill, fixed this.

Re: And who will you give it to?

Don't be daft. It's OK to give a shit about these things inbetween giving a shit about all the others. You can't rank everything in order of ultimate importance.

It's very glib to suggest animal issues get more attention than human ones - people just come out with that when they want to wring their hands over how no one cares about what they should. Except that they do. Just not everything all at once. If you did that you couldn't get out of bed for angst.

Re: Plan B

I'm sure you have some horrendous stories but that's pretty vicious. Surely no one deserves that.

Re: @b166er

Easy now boys.

Re: @ Sarah

You figured it out on some level, didn't you? If you express an opinion, that's one thing, but making rash declarations of what should happen to people is another. See?

Beer always good. The rest of you - I'm not getting into a discussion about this and if you try and post anything limit-testing, I will zap you till you can't sit down.

Re: Indeed, must be FUD Friday.

Oh honestly, you lot are the *limit*.

'Blogging'? Just because it's on the internet doesn't make it a blog, you know.

If it makes any difference to any of you, I wrote the headline and sub-head. Also, I have never seen Bill in a compromising situation with an iPhone. In case you've forgotten - we have a pop at everyone. Just not at the same time.

Re: Maybe a silly question

You know men can have sex with men too.

But I don't want to ruin your fantasy.

Re: Gravedigging I know

Um, no. Rein. Think about it. Or look it up.