Nice try
the highly paid consultancy shifts for Rometty will likely not be well received by some in the rank and fileAre you competing for understatement of the year? If so, you're in with a good chance.
I'd hoped for better from Arvind.
1745 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Jan 2008
"They have a fifteen year plan." And at the end of it they will be ahead of the West in many aspects of hi tech, having learnt from the current trade war that Western countries are unreliable partners. Well done tRump, you helped to Make China Great Again!
"It should be noted that there is no evidence that has been made public, or even referred to, of AT&T spying. The argument put forward by the Chinese government is that by being based in the USA the company is subject to government pressure and therefore it should be assumed that it will end up spying for its Washington masters."
Sounds reasonable to me.
Facts: https://www.corp.att.com/worldwide/att-you-china/
"the NZ IRD would achive better result by engaging some local talent, like the Piranha Brothers"
Even better, they could have launched a worldwide pandemic and closed the NZ border to everybody except returning expats, many of whom might regard paying back their student loan as better than dying in an overcrowded NHS hospital.
(Needed an icon for "Sick Joke Alert")
"Are you comfortable with the Chinese government having ready access to the personal calls of our politicians? Of OUR intelligence agents?"
Who is "our"? El Reg is not a US publication to my knowledge. Just play with the variables here, e.g. "are you comfortable with the Swedes having access...?" If you're British, "are you comfortable with the Americans having access...?".
All this has nothing to do with security; that's smoke and mirrors designed to conceal a good old-fashioned trade war.
The whole anti-China thing was bound to appeal to tRump but unfortunately a lot of this stuff is bipartisan and Biden will not automatically reverse it. It's ultimately stupid, since the instigator of a trade war almost always loses; in this case China will be the big winner because they will emerge with a stronger hi-tech industry than ever, including a cradle-to-grave supply chain that doesn't depend on the West.
Your definition of straightforward and a patent examiner's definition of "obvious to one skilled in the art" might be different. Remember that patents in this case would have been approved *before* the standard was agreed and published. What seemed straightforward when you read the standard might not have been considered obvious several years previously when the patent application was evaluated.
It's not the wrong way round. If patents are not disclosed during the open standardisation process, the result is highly unfair on companies that choose to implement the open standard in ignorance of the patents. Most standards development organisations (including the ITU) have strict disclosure requirements to avoid this unfairness. If Nokia is proved to have ignored those requirements, they will lose the case, painfully.
Once upon a time in a country far far away, I had my hands on a network and an interpreted language that could send bits of code to be executed in another computer. For example, a bit of code that printed HELLO on the console and then picked another computer at random and send itself off there. Made quite an interesting concert on the various DECwriters around the room. Amusingly hard to stop.
... for misleading wording by Kieren.
.org owner Internet SocietyNo, actually the IANA function of ICANN "owns" top level domain names, i.e. has the final say as to who has the right to run the corresponding registry. ISOC sort-of owns the PIR corporation which has been assigned that registry right by IANA.
But the subsequent financial reliance on ISOC, even though the IETF also raises money through sponsors and conference attendance fees, has not always resulted in a healthy dynamic.What is unhealthy about the relationship? I've tracked it since the beginning in 1992, and it's always been fine and productive.
But those efforts continue apace, not least with China’s “New IP” proposal that would see more modern and efficient systems for networking management than the current TCP/IP approach. That proposed system would have clear advantages, but also have surveillance and control baked into it.First, it isn't "China's" anything, it's Huawei. If NewIP is China's, then the Web is Switzerland's. More to the point, it isn't yet at all clear that NewIP is well-defined, technically plausible, and economically feasible. There are those who think it is none of those things. Thirdly, what is specified so far neither supports nor contradicts the assertion about surveillance and control. All we've seen are a few empty words about the importance of security and privacy.
Reform-ishThe Board is still in the process of chartering a governance working group, to be precise. And it isn't a matter of the Board insisting on control of proposed changes; it's mandated by the Internet Society's by-laws, which require a four-fifths majority of the Board to approve by-law changes. The Internet Society is incorporated in the District of Columbia and can only act within the relevant D.C. law and the rules of the US tax system for non-profits, and of course that includes obeying its own by-laws.That effort exists, albeit in a half-hearted fashion. The board created a new body to look at its governance... However, a culture is hard to change and the board has insisted on maintaining complete control of any proposed changes to its governance.
I would appreciate more care and accuracy in reporting in future.
"The sanctions are not politically motivated. They are financially motivated."
There's no distinction between the two in the tRumpian view of the universe, which has apparently infected the party formerly known as Conservative. This is an incredibly stupid move that will come back to bite the UK both politically and financially, when the revitalised Chinese high-tech industry takes over in 5 or so years from now. (We all know that technically and from a security viewpoint, the Huawei kit is just as good as anybody else's.)
The worse the impact on Huawei, the worse it will be for Western industry a few years from now. Success of the US trade war against Huawei will only increase the Chinese efforts to build their own high-tech supply chain and make themselves even better at defeating Western competitors.
Playing trade as a zero-sum game has never been a good idea. Hopefully the Biden Administration will understand that in a way that tRump never could.
"US envy". Exactly. They made up the necessary lies (e.g. that Huawei has military ties and is controlled by the CCP) that Cisco etc. suggested to them. I hope the Biden administration will back off on the dirty war side of things, even if they still consider China as a dangerous trade rival.
It was a bit worse than not showing AOA DISAGREE if the AOAs disagreed. It was also an incredibly stupid software "feature" that consulted one or the other AOA on alternating flights, so an anomaly noticed on flight N would vanish on flight N+1 and reappear on flight N+2. As I read the reports, both flights that crashed were examples of N+2: an AOA anomaly had been reported two flights earlier, but signed off as transient before flight N+1.
Well, I tried that on jabberwacky.com, and I have to agree it didn't go too well:
Who are you?
John goes into a restaurant.
You should try escargot.
He orders lobster.
Lobsters aren't that cool.
He pays his bill and leaves.
But dave is a statue.
Now, what did John eat?
I can't tell you - spies are everywhere.
Speaking of conveyor belts (well, not really) I once heard from a purported eyewitness of a safety person investigating how a worker had managed to seriously staple her finger with a heavy-duty industrial stapler, despite its safety guard. "How did it happen?" asked the safety person. "Like this!" said the worker's supervisor, before they rushed him off to hospital. (This was decades ago, in a factory in a city in the East Midlands.)
"Nonetheless, Green contends DKIM's unintended side effect of permanent accountability should be rolled back. "
What on earth makes him think it is unintended? Perhaps he forgot to read the Abstract of the DKIM RFC:
DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) permits a person, role, or organization that owns the signing domain to claim some responsibility for a message by associating the domain with the message. This can be an author's organization, an operational relay, or one of their agents. DKIM separates the question of the identity of the Signer of the message from the purported author of the message. Assertion of responsibility is validated through a cryptographic signature and by querying the Signer's domain directly to retrieve the appropriate public key. Message transit from author to recipient is through relays that typically make no substantive change to the message content and thus preserve the DKIM signature.
"The Initiative lists related projects from the Internet Engineering Task Force ... "
No. The IETF doesn't have a "project" and the draft they cite is a personal contribution that has been widely criticised. That github repo is basically a scribbling pad with no status for the moment.
That's not to say the IETF plans to increase the use of offensive or exclusionary language. But the way an ongoing discussion is misleadingly cited as a "related project" is tendentious to say the least. To say that in a more dark grey and pale grey way, it's a lie.
"who actually takes office"
Pres. Biden, for sure. Remember that the armed forces swear to protect the Constitution first of all.
Who do I feel sorry for? The poor fools in the Secret Service who get assigned to protect ex-President Trump. That will really be a punishment assignment.
Definitely a <see icon> day.
"wonder WTF the canucks were thinking when they decided to go for a re-run of this with Miss Huawei"
Actually they were just following orders from south of the border: Canada border agent says he received unusual FBI phone call in Huawei CFO U.S. extradition case | Reuters
Dropbox, for example, say this in their terms of service:
Your use of our Services must comply with our Acceptable Use Policy. Content in the Services may be protected by others’ intellectual property rights. Please don’t copy, upload, download, or share content unless you have the right to do so.Somehow I doubt if MegaUpload said that.
Yes. There's no doubt that Trump has given China (not just Huawei) the strongest possible motivation for developing a complete chip supply chain. It will take them a few years, but it will definitely Make China Great Again. About the worst possible thing Trump could have done for American hi-tech.
My grandmother (who was brought up when gas was available in Burnley, but not electricity) didn't agree. She thought that just like you need a gas tap on every outlet, you also need an electricity tap. When the plug-in electric clock (a present to my grandfather from grateful parishioners) finally broke and was thrown away, she saw that there was no switch on its specially installed round 2-pin socket over the mantelpiece. (This was years before 13 amp sockets were installed.) So she sealed off the escaping electricity by Selotaping an aluminium milk bottle top over the socket. (This was years before home milk deliveries stopped.)
Fortunately the short circuit that readers are no doubt hoping for did not occur, and she survived for many more years. The next time we visited, my father ripped off the aluminium, but I'm pretty sure Grandma insisted on a stout cardboard replacement. You don't want electricity leaking into the room.
"So I can see why some people would turn to Access and even Excel to meet their requirements."
Right. Let's say you urgently have to report infections and deaths for a serious new illness to a central authority, knowing full well that the results will be in the national media as well as sent off to the World Health Organisation. I wonder what you'd choose...
Cookies just make tracking easier. If there were no cookies, tracking would still be done, but it would use a third party service of some kind, and would by now be a very big machine learning application. Abolition of tracking via cookies would just be a nice business opportunity for somebody. I'm guessing that the major CDNs would be able to offer a tracking service as a lucrative add-on, for example.
"one would hope"
Downvote because "hope" is remarkably ineffective against profit-driven capitalism. So is regulation, since it's trivial to off-shore the surveillance system into a less regulated jurisdiction.
The only way to make things better is to use unbreakable cryptography end-to-end, which is exactly what the spooks and the cops hate most. And even that doesn't work if the remote site you are accessing collaborates with the surveillance system (which is often called by a name such as Google). So that needs unbreakable anonymity too. Which among other things requires you to hide your IP address. Which means using TOR all the time for everything. Which the spooks and the cops also hate, apart from it being a PITA.
So GPC will be exactly as successful as DNT.
(I recently got a new "smart" TV. It's so smart that its manufacturer is now slinging ads and spam at me on every system where my Google ID shows up. So far they haven't found me on the Register site, which is slightly reassuring.)
"Its just the same as PIR trying to sell off .org but at least that was blocked."
No, it isn't. It may be hard for Kieren's fans to believe, but .org was always going to be operated under constraints placed by Kieren's arch-fiend known as ICANN. The .org registrants wouldn't have noticed much difference.
The .uk situation is completely different because the ultimate authority is the UK government. We'd be much better off with the registry run by civil servants than the corporate animal that is Nominet. It's being going downhill for years and now it seems to have reached rock bottom: not fit for purpose.
I have no doubt that China is already developing its own alternatives to Western suppliers for all this machinery (the highest of high tech, as far as I can tell). And of course, because of the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, this move will increase the likelihood of Taiwan finding itself part of China again sometime in the next ten years. So this will all work out very well for China in the end, and badly for the USA. Another embellishment for Trump's CV.
"Around 6.4 per cent of all Android downloads are attributed to devices from New Zealand. Why?"
Right now, the NHS app isn't available on Google Play in NZ. And its name doesn' t remotely resemble "NZ COVID tracer". So this is very odd. (Anyone who operates with an NZ SIM in the UK is either nuts or rich and foolish.)