Re: LMGTFY
Thanking you.
874 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jan 2008
I can't help thinking that the idea of a car that's programmed to possibly sacrifice its driver in certain circumstances could be abused. Say James Bond is driving along and a group of 10 henchman deliberately jump out in front of him so that James ends up wrapped around a lamp post.
I am glad brighter brains than mine are working on this.
I suspect you may not be the target market then. The folks I've seen who use these as mobile devices (seen a fair few that never actually leave their desk) have a wireless mouse and expect/demand Wi-Fi everywhere. There's no need for them to lug USB hubs or ethernet adaptors. They're not the kind of people who would know what a VM is, let alone want to run some on a tablet.
Sharp had a notched display that beat Essential to market by a few days. Not that it matters.
I prefer to see the display as having two extra areas rather than having something taken away. Glass half full.
My this year's handset has ears. The remainder of the screen is 2:1 and the presence of the ears really had zero sway on my decision to buy it. I genuinely don't see why people are upset about it.
Bingo. Apple have only done this because it suits them. Either as something to assist negotiations with carriers or some other reason. They want to own everything. It's not unreasonable to anticipate them becoming an MVNO in certain regions. Imagine that, buy iPhone, fire it up, set up iTunes account, choose default Apple network, all your base are belong to us.
I always think disabled accounts could still be a risk. Take disgruntled employee Jonno. Has his account disabled when he's black-bagged on Friday. Rings the service desk on Monday and gets lucky that the operator decides to re-enable his account. Assuming some sort of remote access, Jonno's back in, and up to mischief.
Worse, if another person knew Jonno's account had been disabled they could attempt to get it reactivated and try their luck at a few passwords.
Small, but disabled accounts still pose a risk.
I'd be as concerned about what influence the US government has over Cisco, Juniper, HP et al.
The Huawei-bashing does seem a little bit of a trend these days. Excluding a vendor for something that might happen in the future, with no evidence of past wrongdoings, seems harsh. A thought I'm sure will earn me a downvote or two.