Just the thing we need ...
... to fire at anyone wanting to get on a plane in the USA. Well obviously we need to - that 5 year-old kid might be a terrorist, and the manufacturer's salesman assured us that there's no medical risk at all.
3323 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Dec 2007
"The MPAA Members are sympathetic to legitimate users who may have relied on Megaupload to store their legitimately acquired or created data"
Gosh, that is *so* very generous of them. To actually consider graciously permitting innocent parties to access their own entirely legitimate data!
"If files are going to be handed back, then the MPAA needs to be sure that none of the material infringes copyright"
Why? It's their own data, it's none of the MPAA's business what it is. If they want to inspect it then they should show probable cause to a judge and get a warrant. And they can either get third parties to inspect it, or accept full liability if they are ever found to have later published something which might have been copied from that data. For instance suppose someone has a story idea in that data? If the MPAA seize and inspect that data then they had better never create anything based on that idea, whether or not they actually copied from it.
Being able to read the data is bad enough, but what if it's possible to gain write access?
Will it be possible to switch off someone's electricity supply from anywhere in the world? (And then watch the supplier's bureaucracy take months to switch it back on again).
Next Chinese hacker scare story, they are going to switch off most of the households and businesses in the USA! So of course we need lots of extra powers to combat this.
They locked up the drives for two years, then moved them somewhere else, then looked around for someone to sort them out? Hardly surprising that it went wrong.
If drives with extremely sensitive data were redundant and removed, they should have gone straight to secure destruction.
And surely an NHS region can find enough spare cash to get some gadget that can mangle a disk drive beyond the ability of anyone short of GCHQ to recover data from it.
OK, so these are surplus unlaunched scopes?
How many of this model were launched and are currently in orbit?
And why are these two surplus?
Either they no longer, without shuttle, have the ability to launch them - which means they know NASA certainly can't and the whole thing is a publicity stunt.
Or they are surplus because the US military now have something much better.
"What we might see is a number of low level events that occur within a particular family or child's life"
He was once exposed to Rock music - he's obviously vulnerable to Satanic Ritual Abuse, we'd better do a midnight raid to snatch him away from his parents.
By that time we'll be able to get to the galactic centre and lob stars into the black hole. Fire up a jet along the galactic axis, and make sure it only goes in one direction rather than switching directions as most do. With the reaction from the jet, fly the Milky Way away from the collision.
Trouble is that using a botnet is very illegal - you're using other people's computers without their permission.
Yes, it's a good way to attack your enemies, and if they thought they could get away with it then I wouldn't put it past them for a moment.
But if they can't be absolutely certain of getting away with it then it's too big a risk - they would be in very serious trouble indeed if it got out.
Though of course they might be that stupid.
Yes, if the content is blocked then presumably the only way Google can index it is if they specifically let googlebot through.
So are they complaining that Google is indexing stuff that they deliberately allowed Google to see so that it could be indexed? If they only wanted the text indexed then it would be trivial to let that through and block the images.
The police claim that the information isn't stored.
If they do not, once the things are widespread, promptly start pushing for the information to be permanently stored then they will be breaking with every tradition of police behaviour for the last several decades.
How much will it cost to upgrade security for every single military and business and private site that relies on a fence for security?
In fact how can they be upgraded? Anywhere with extensive grounds will have people dropping in for a look. Anywhere with a back garden will have burglars dropping in.
Just how many haircuts do they expect one person to need? Or do they expect you to spend all day in a spa?
If they offered something that might possibly classify as useful it might be worth looking at it.
But presumably the people who developed it think haircuts and spa days really are what Londoners are all desperate for. At least the Londoners who think it's a good idea to take a bike onto a tube.