Indeed. It's terrific how the EV fans assume everyone shares their use cases.
Here's what my recent journey would have looked like with air travel instead of driving:
1. Drive 2.5 hours (at least) to the airport. 145 miles.
2. Fly to the airport nearest my first destination. Minimum of a 2-hour wait. $400 or so.
3. Rent a car, because there's no other way to get from the airport to where I'm going. Time from flight arrival to when I'm in the car is at least an hour (from prior experience), maybe more. Expedia gives me rental prices around $400.
4. Drive 2 hours / 100 miles to my destination. That's an entire day gone, longer than the 10 hours I would have spent driving it.
5. Three days later, do the same to return to the airport.
6. Fly to the cheapest major airport near my next destination. Another wait of 2+ hours at the airport, then a few more hours in the air. This is a one-way flight and I might get lucky on pricing; let's say $100.
7. Rent another car, so another $400. Drive 90 miles to my destination. I might arrive in time to have dinner with someone, if flight schedules work out.
8. A few days later, it's that 90 miles back to the airport.
9. Flight #3, the price of which I can't check because I've just lost Internet. This time I'm headed to a small city that isn't near any particularly large airports, so I'm not sure what my best option would be anyway. But it's the usual story: Wait at the airport, fly, rent a car (now we're up to $1200 in car rental fees – except this one is being rented for a week, so probably more like $1500 or $1800).
10. Now I have the choice of flying back to the airport from step 1, which is the faster and cheaper option; or visiting people on the way back, which is what I actually did. So either it's a less-rewarding trip, or multiple flights and more car rentals.
In short, the "just fly" argument is as feeble as the "you can stop every three hours" argument. That's an option for some people, for some trips. It doesn't work for everyone.