Waste of Good taxes by bad people
None of them put the fart in George Bush's cabbage.
1355 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Dec 2007
You forget the seriously brain damaged regime under which the cack all got started. A bunch of crooks and liars got together to have a mental retard son of an ex president made commander in chief of everything unholy because a bunch of retards would vote for it.
And they did.
Everybody sensible refrained from voting.
By the second round it was too late.
I can't imagine why Flemming chose it originally but for the plots the character was in, it was an handy weapon. It just turned out that in a book, you don't put such a charcter up against the laws of chance and AK 47s.
One thing about small calibre weapons is that they are easy to get used to packing. It is much too tempting to leave your .50 in the drawer half the time. And when you next see a modern hero reloading one of them, take a look at the scene just before he unloaded it to see where he might be wearing half a dozen clips of spare ammo at a pound a time.
BTW; does a Walther PPK only work on ladies or can you kill men with them too?
I don't know why you got a down vote.
I am just curious how you are going to use the well if your pigs ever eat you.
And I find it hard to imagine anyone getting into the pen with a herd of 700 pound flesh eaters at dinnertime. There is always one and he would have known that. Sounds more like he had an attack of something (heart or dizzy spell) and fell in.
How the hell they are going to do an autopsy?
Seriously. He'd be semidigested by the time he was almost found and by anyone got around to doing anything to the pigs would have been well on his way to methane and carbon dioxide.
Just going in with them to pick up the remains would have been an ordeal anyone would put off for a long while.
There is no valid social reason to have laws against copying. The Sellas of Egypt -even the stylus of writing seems to have been designed for public copying.
Social mores on drug use might have had a reason in Victorian Britain in the days when Healtrh and Safety laws were not as draconian as they are now. And even today the idea of uncontrolled hard drug use when a victim of them might for example be driving a car, warrants policing.
But the idea of having laws is to givethe people of various cultures an overall basis for living in peace with their neighbours. The biblical stories of shepherds fighting over wells and such was the main cause of family feuds and skirmishes between tribes and still is in desert areas.
Laws are supposed to be about sharing, not not sharing. If a man or a group of players achieved what is today called stardon the payment came from a royal pension or from the benevolence of rich benefactors. We still have those sorts of ideas in the form of subsidised arts and charitable trusts set up by rich people avoiding taxes.
And we still have artists starving even with all the rich companies involved in spinning discs. I don't know any musicians in the pubs locally who are getting any help from the big record companies. In fact I imagine some of the poor artists are having to pay the rich companies. And what for?
So a few dozen drinkers can hear and perhaps go out and buy the records?
There is every case to be made for music indutry giants being made to pay performers advertising their wares for them.
> The trade body’s head, Nuno Pereira, believes DIAP’s decision means it simply couldn’t be bothered pursuing so many actions:
> “I think the prosecutors just found a way to adapt the law to their interest – and their interest is not having to send 2,000 letters, hear 2,000 people and investigate 2,000 computers”.
It does seem like the predicament that would ultimately be met by tax payers is not only the equivalent to payment by stealth if they had decided on the other course of action; it would have amounted to the equivalent of a DDoS attack on the various criminal justice departments wherever the opposite ruling takes effect.
I can see Britain following suit. Consider what Australia would do.
It's a good job nobody lives there. Imagine the queues for justice if their population density was on a par with the density of their political master's. In fact it would take a nation as rich and stupid as the USA to enforce such a thing.
He doesn't sound such a bad chap compared to that chimpanzee that got paid for the fireworks -including phosphor bombing Iraqiis.
To say he is the best of a bad lot is an understatement. And at least we know the name of the big man soon to be at the head of a company that could possible do what AOL-Time Warner signally failed so crushingly at; the Robber Murkdog wan't capable of even approaching legally and who the **** else there are I can't even rememeber...
Was it MFI?
> Can you imagine *any* other Prime Minister saying "sorry, we got it wrong" like this?
Tory Bloody Liar is now a multimillionaire.
He should be wearing stripes and arrows whilst sewing mailbags and eating porridge.
Hells bells! He deserves a lot worse.
Hanging, drawing and quartering after a few days in the stocks if nothing worse and only after demonstrating in every county town square throughout the land that water torture is just that. After which his body should be publically humiliated by being interred in sewage farms around the various countries that make up this Septic Ill.
His family should be publically neutered and his property turned over for use as toilets and brothels.
And where the ****! is that damned Margaret Thatcher Icon when I want it?
You should apply for a job at any supermarket or their warehouse and go to the interview. It is a disgrace.
I am not just sayin that. I went to a warehouse in Cheshire making meat products for Morrisons -a "family firm".
It was a prison as well as a con.
I am not larding it on. It is just so.
There was a girl from Kidwelly
Who worked at the local Muckdelli
The job was a cinch to Exceptional Finch
But they sacked her because they are a bunch of arseholes that sell shit that includes chocolate sprinkles from a supplier that only sprinkled their production lines with "very small amounts" of toilet seepage once -for an unknown length of time, to idiots.
The housewives' choice (in the days we had houswives) would have been music while they worked.
Better then the single choice of noise coming out of the kitchen if and when the little woman does any work in such a place these days. I'm surprised nobody has thought of doing something like that before. Today, the average cook of either sex has abilities that struggle to reach average, a video/cooker might improve things.
At the very least they might incorporate a cookbook.
Hell it might even make going to the laundrette interesting in a sad life style way.
>Yahoo! How would you like to survive?
>Hint: If you improve the value of your email system, you would improve the value of your company etc,. etc..
Too late. They went to the last hell when they snitched.
Now Google is crawling over the woodwork while we all wonder about them bejing next.
700 rounds per minute.
Where would you use a weapon like that?
And how?
That sort of thing was originally designed to clean trenches in WW1. A war were poison gas was legal.
Since then, their accuracy has been marginally improved. I wouldn't know by how much but in WW2 they were used for house to house fighting. Nobody was going to worry about women and children in that sort of scenario were they?
And not at 700 rpm these day too, neither!
Not even including time to reload and catch breath while surging on adrenaline.
Never mind the psychology involved. You permit men willing and able to kill with fury-aforethought to trample all over a country park with or without children and or pregnant women abounding and what could happen next?
What IS possible (never mind the "we are well trained and competent" bit, even if you can prove it by not killing people you ended up kicking shit out of) what can happen?
Someone having a bad day falls over in his haste and a gun goes bang. What next?
WTF was nobody thinking?
It is a measure of worth. Like double decker busses only for people. Like a blair is not worth a wank a very short one and a royal is worth two tits on a front page.
A duchess is like five double decker buses mounting each other. They don't get anywhere they haven't been born but they are big and red and impressive.
Since Ice melt is considered 100% insolation and methane is lighter than air; methane relesed to the atmosphere over the north or south pole probably contributes to cooling processes.
Hint:
blankets = insulation.
It would certainly explain the ice caps when you realise that all stroms created at the tropics eventually find there way to the north or South pole where they tend to dissappear as Lows and get reincarnated as Highs.
Anyone know what fear of science is called?
Or fear of previously unknown geophenomena?
> The newer ice will of course be thinner than the older ice, and more likely to melt away when things warm up again the following year.
It is the following year. See> graph!
See?
No?
Try this link:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/09/21/arctic_antarctic_sea_ice_record/
> You missed the point entirely.
>
> It was my hope that those reading my comment would be able to discern this for themselves.
I daresay that the OP was of the same opinion.
I on the other hand appreciate that people who can't think for themselves can't see for themselves.
And just won't be told.
It's the reason people go to gaol, get sacked, lose, you know; the usual suspects... Environmentally ill people.
It's all very sad. And usual.
I spent the last few days trying to understand the Arctic situation by looking up EarthObservatory and Wikipedia stuff. It's full of the shit you complain of.
And it turns out thatr periodic disasters are required to keep the environment balanced. Fire gets rid of podsoil in the Taiga fore example allowing birdlif to control spruce killing insects. And the periodic floods wash the ash and topsoil to the Arctic wher it fertilises the richest mairine environmnet on earth.
Even the way the ice behaves is badly presented.
I'm going to steal the article for my blog. (I hope no one notices.)
But plenty of time for a decent hacker to get them online.
(18 months to 2 years tops.)
((Less than 6 weeks if they actually get put on whatever servers they are going to be put on straight away.))
Timelineprobabilities:
3 years (first row of retirees) to get the data handed over.
2 years to find out some are missing.
1 year to second branch of retirements and find missing links.
6 weeks to get some of them out of the gaol.
2 years to plod along finding (and losing and getting more hacked) yet more unhanded over data.
6 years before the next scandal.
How many's that?
Another year to decide to open the databanks early.
46 weeks bickering over that in Parliament.
1 y...Ah... never mind, we weren't expecting any better.
No icon in protest at having no grinning, smarmy, Thatcher icon.
The price of failure was over a million. It was all about shelling out from there.
A million could have hired a meeting hall to practice after the auditions and the residue spent on an opening night.
Then the money starts coming in all over again.
Spending money you haven't got is a crime. Spending money you have got, wastefully, can be classified as lavish.
Unless it was from the tosser who downvoted random K, this place must be lousy with nits on.
In the USA you are allowed to say anything.
If he had incited a crime, there may have been grounds to prosecute once a crime had been committed. But tweeting that he was going to go on a bridge is not a crime even if it is against the law to go on a bridge. Encouraging others to join him is hardly even a misdemeanour.
Twitter aught to lose a lot of their free paying customers when their only consners are the police in what is coming to be seen as the United Police States of America.
Why did they have to send in a spy to prove there is slavery in China?
Anyone with two fully functional brain cells and ten minutes down time to rest them, could have realised it was bloody obvious that they couldn't turn out Fan Boy fodder like they have over the last two decades without riding herd on human souls like the sugar barons of England.
Nor did anyone imagine their desk-tops got here by magic because of a mark down following a bankruptsy?
It'll be interesting to see what banana republic's embassy the old snot rag will flee to when britain tells america to send the rich creep packing.
And how much the Yankers spend on policing it's grounds. At least the trigger happy buggers are well known for shooting British and colonials when there aren't any negroes handy.
The information was certainly made available on British jurisdiction.
That should be the ultimate distinction. Not where the actual data was put into the wild.
No third party should be held to account for the shortcomings of a computer network.
If you don't want information made available don't put it in the disseminator. Why is that so difficult to understand?
Even a chimpanzee can understand that you don't just classify information; you put the stuff you don't want seen under a different carpet. In Cuba say, or Syria.
But why should any court anywhere have to decide what is in a country's jurisdiction?
If it was done here it has to be punishable here. Or at least examined here in the light of a less dictatorial xenaphobic nation.