Price...
And I thought the apple flash drive was expensive at $69.00 (or so it was said in the article).
So, vibrators are a bit more expensive that Max OS Lion.
3058 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Dec 2007
Greece now issuing coins with "classic" portraits of Plato, Aristotle, and Alexander the great. Silver optional. Price: multi euro's. Greek currency crisis solved, and retirement age back to 50 years.
Oh, by the way, you need to volunteer for service in "the 300" to get benefits....
Jeez...
Everyone is an "expert" and with all them "experts", we can have a "consensus". You would think that they know everything. If they are so "accurate" in this "climate change" stuff, predict with 100% accuracy the weather next week.
Good luck, the weather service can't do that, and they have lots of computers AND real experts to back them up.
By the way, there is a tropical storm of the US Atlantic Ocean. Have your "consensus" "experts" tell us what is going to happen with it. Make my day!
Tides come, tides go, but the ocean stays the same!
Spends almost a tera-buck on "stimulus" and has VERY little to show for it. It spends such a little amount on NASA and we get things like good computers, and this silly thing called the internet (with a little help from ARPA).
I could probably throw money away more efficiently than they do it (and keep enough to live from). (*SIGH*)
That's what we people get when we (no, I didn't vote for him) elect a socialist president.
If you do "invent" something and DON'T patent it, the guy who files the patent on your thing needs to know about "prior art". The problem here is that the USPTO thinks that the only prior art is the patents that THEY see. A trade magazine that I read publishes lots of "design ideas" that are cute little things that look neat, but probably aren't worth the effort in filing a patent, much less actually getting a patent. I seriously doubt that the USPTO actually looks at such things, or a modern CS book (or Knuth's series). One can only hope that if the USPTO is given a bit more $$$ they might get some "knowledge" in such subjects.
All patents can't be like those of Telsa and three phase power!
"On the other hand, carrying away $300,000 in gold, even at today's prices, will require a fair bit of work."
Not so fast...
Today's quote of gold is: $1526 (and some change)
So, $300,000 is 196.5 troy ounces.
Troy ounces are 31.1 grams (plus a bit)
A little math and this comes to 6,111g (or 6.111 kg). A bit more math and one gets 13.5 lb.
In my book, this is a bit heaver than a laptop (probably an old one) in a backpack. In my book, not much "work"!!
Of course if this were back in the 60's, when gold was $35/oz it would be a bit heaver! (40 stone heaver!!)
Look, if we didn't have the C-like syntax, we would be stuck with something like Fortran or (god forbid) Cobol (try that for a systems language!). Even Algol-60 is bad, and try to implement Algol-68 (has anybody really done this?). Sorry the C-like syntax is here to stay, or else you get "significant white space".
As for C++, why bother. I defer to someone more expert on the subject: <http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/c++/linus>.
When I look at C++ vs. C, another thing I look at are the volumes written by the "authors" of the language. K&R is about 1/2 inch thick. Bjarne's book on C++ is about three times as thick, and really doesn't describe the language as it has lots of: "// ..." comments, and incomplete "discussions" of the language. C you can understand from what you are looking at. Look at C++ source, and the code you need to understand the code could be many modules away, for the "+" operator even!
Lastly, a famous quote: "The thing about standards is that there are so many of them."
Don't you need to be somewhat sober to USE the application to find the checkpoint? Can you operate an iPhone when you had a few drinks?
It seems that one of these field sobriety tests might be "use your iPhone".
I leave it to others (the Register might step in here with some research!) to do the research on how much alcohol it takes before you are total thumbs in using an iPhone. Say, on a Friday afternoon over at the pub?
We had WIRED telephones, and WIRELESS television. Now we have WIRELESS telephones and WIRED (cable, etc) TELEVISION. Of course, one can also have point to point television using all the bandwidth to cover everyone's "instant gratification", instead of a broadcast medium, but that might be wasteful (so we should promote it for income streams).
It is all silly. Most of the 4G crud is "broadcast" or streaming video anyway (big data hogs), and should be done as group addresses, but that would be too efficient. So everyone is happy that they can start THEIR TV program on a wireless connection at 7:03 PM, instead of 7:00 like everyone else.
Do we need to be THAT connected?
...of a TECO contest a (long) while ago. All sorts of entries, but when the last guy got a PDP-10 emulator running (under TECO!) everybody else just gave up and awarded him the prize. Kinda equivalent.
As everyone says: Not very useful, but an interesting exercise, and possible benchmark!
Only an original HP-35 calculator will do. As one who bought one in 1972 at full retail ($395.00 as I remember) it was wonderful. It originally had the goof in it (exp function), but I did get it fixed. Alas, I sold it when I got my next calculator (an HP-45).
It DID get me a 100% on a thermodynamics quiz when the next lowest grade was in the 30% range. Those were the days!!
All software patents MUST have workable source code published. In the form used by the patent holder, not some obfuscated churned output. Also an explaination of the code is needed as well.
So, simple Unix code won't work, you need something like the Lyons book in addition to the code to get a patent.
That would brings these things down to a halt quite quickly. Once you see the code, you can easily code around the "bad parts". That is if you want the world to see how you actually do your task.
The biggest problem with the US patent system is that the patent examiners only think that "Prior Art" (the basis for allowing claims and such) is previous patents. In the case of software, there is LOADS of "prior art" that exists that is NOT patented. The patent examiners don't deal with this at all, and something that is unknown to the examiner, but is common knowledge to us computer guys, is treated as "novel" and a patent is issued.
While not the cause for the problem, the court of the eastern district of Texas is a nightmare. Wonderful courts to be a plaintiff.
(*SIGH*)
If you remember the 60's (if you were there, you might not), the spooler for OS/360 was HASP (Houston Automatic Spooling Program), developed by NASA ans spread all over the world.
Those who forget history are bound to repeat its errors.
Maybe Google should open source its ranking algorithm? (Fat chance!).
The clock in most PC type computers has a clock chip that has DST built in. The design is based on the Motorola (at the time, I don't know who sells it now) MC68HC18 clock chip. The original IBM PC-AT has one of these chips, and most modern computers have the core in a bridge chip. It has DST starting on the last Sunday of April, and ending on the last Sunday of October (which was the rule when it was designed). In the USA we first changed the rule to have DST start on the first Sunday of April (it was done at the behest of the Barbecue industry). Now the latest change is to start in March (second Sunday) and end on the first Monday in November. The saying we use around here is "Spring forward, Fall back", but the advance date for what others call "summer time", is now in the WINTER. STUPID government.
If you want to change your hours for the summer, then simply do it!
...is to have your "ordinary" site in the "xxx" domain. There you will probably NOT be subjected to all sorts of phishing, and spam attacks. It might even be peaceful.
Of course, what about those domains that are dutifully registered in ".com". Who will register "theregister.xxx" for example? Then again, it might host the NSFW content we see here anyway. At least I'd assume that what is going on.
To "secure" iOS anyway? Maybe they should sanction a reasonable jailbreak (unofficially) and let that be it.
Of course, it could be as secure as WP7 (and given Microsoft it probably isn't)
p.s. I don't even have a smart phone, which is probably more secure than any other thing.
I saw Top Gear last night here in the USA, and they had their version of a snowplow. It seemed to work OK in Norway, plowing a road. The problem is that they didn't understand the fine points of building a snowplow. To eradicate LARGE amounts of snow, one uses a rotary snowplow which takes the snow and throws it over the edge of the road. The simple plow (and the snowbine demonstrated) just push stuff out of the way, and just delays the problem for a while.
While snow doesn't happen too often in the London area, those who do attempt to handle it might want to look at a place that deals with it yearly (we here in California have nice mountain passes to try out schemes!).
It just gobbles up more and more money in its support.
I remember talking to someone who had to write support for WebTV (another Microsoft product) for their web site. He noted that given the user population that used WebTV and its cost to support it, he could GIVE those users who had WebTV a modern computer while dropping support for WebTV and STILL be ahead in his costing.
Yes, IE6 will be around as long as stupid web sites REQUIRE it. Wonderful that a standards based implementation works SO well.
Suggestion to Microsoft: Kill off IE7 and IE8. You will save a bunch of money and let everyone use Firefox, which is much more secure.
Has anyone with a "reasonable" budget (like a law enforcement agency, NOT NSA) EVER recovered data from a disk drive overwritten with zeros? I think that there is a challenge on some web site for this. Extrapolate this to SSD's and the story continues.
Yes, just "marking for deletion" as most of us do doesn't do much, regardless of which media we use. Flotsam and Jetsam of the digital variety.
Back a few years ago, we had the "Frito Bandito" (complete with drawn in handelbar mustache). Nobody really complained about that characterization.
Look humor IS legitimate, get over it!
Of course, if this were some tirade about a certain religion, those who spoke bad would be under a death threat, even for drawing a cartoon!