Re: Sad
> The uploading (distribution) turns it from a civil offence to a criminal offence.
Does anyone have a link to a decent translatoin of Finnish copyright law?
Because the above is most certainly untrue in the UK...
Vic.
5860 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Dec 2007
> I'd say the deprivation would be of the revenue
Yes, but that's a false dichotomy.
No-one is claiming that copyright infringement is permissible.
What we're saying is that it isn't Theft. Theft is a well-defined offence, and copyright is also a well-defined offence - but a different one.
So whilst copyright infringement might mean you don't get some putative licensing fee, to describe it as theft simply demonstrates an ignorance of what that word means. That still doesn't make infringement right, but it doesn't make it Theft either.
Vic.
> make it ext4 and you can easily resize it anyway
ext3 is just as easy to resize...
I'm coming to the position that ext4 should be avoided on laptops if at all possible. Laptops have a tendency to shut down uncleanly - particularly if they're as crap as mine are. ext3 can take a long time to clean up afterwards, but I've had quite a few situations on ext4 where fsck cannot sort the disk out. I've been dropped to a command prompt on many occasions, and I've lost quite a bit of data. Neither of these is a good situation, and for the novice user, an enforced CLI is a show-stopper.
ext4 is much quicker than ext3, but if there's a chance of losing power, I really wouldn't recommend it.
Vic.
> I suspect that the place in Namibia where they tested it was similar
The point about the Namibia testing range is that the angles are right - the wind comes onshore at the irght angle to the shoreline, and the seafloor slope is such that the waves are tolerable.
Disclosure: I used to sit and chat to Malcolm about this on the ferry over to the IoW when they were testing the first boat.
Vic.
> the only possible meaning of the sentence is that Patten wasn't available.
Not so.
You're interpreting "he" as a reflexive. That is one possible meaning, or else it could refer to someone referred to in the previous sentence - namely "the peer", meaning Lord Hall.
> Back to writing school for you Fiveash
Back to reading school for you, Millar.
Vic.
> So they MUST be relevant.
No, they *may* be relevant.
The Judge has already said he's not asure about what Samsung are doing here, but he's being scrupulously fair; the rules of discovery permit Samsung's lawyers to know the content of this deal, and he's damn well going to let them know, even if he doesn't think it will help.
Maybe he's right, maybe he's wrong. None of us know, because we haven't seen the HTC agreement. If it does contain what Samsung thinks it does, it will scupper Apple's "irreparable harm" claim. But it might not contain any such thing.
Vic.
> The future for electrical retailers is a hybrid of in town small retail stores
The future for electrical retailers is entirely on-line. Their former premises will be taken over by collection depots, who receive your on-line orders on your behalf and let you pick them up at a convenient time...
Vic.
> Maplin are already down the tubes.
I bought something frmo them a couple of years back. I had to order on-line (they had no stock) to be delivered to a local store.
I picked the box up and took it home. the kit was DOA, so I returned it.
Maplins would neither refund nor replace from the store; I had to wait a fortnight for the refund, then re-order.
So I don't buy from Maplins any longer.
Vic.
> the same build process can be initiated to build the module again for the updated kernel
Yes, that's the dkms route.
It requires dkms to be run on boot, it requires the kernel-dev stuff to be installed, it needs a compiler available.
It's still a very long shot. I don't see this as a significant threat.
Vic.
> Once the code is perfected, it can be ported to whatever OS is vulnerable to attack
Yes, but you've entirely missed the point I was making.
If you can place your code on a box running kernel version 2.6.32-5, that attack *will not work* on an otherwise-identical OS running kernel 2.6.32-46. The module willl not be loaded, and the attack will fail.
For this to be a widespread infection, the vector would need to install the kmod for every kernel fitted, and would need to monitor the filesystem on a regular basis in case any new kernels were installed. Each new installation would then need to be re-infected by downloading a new module built for that specific kernel.
This is an interesting attack, to be sure, but it's incredibly unlikely to go anywhere.
Vic.
> How would this thing get on the server in the first place?
The "full disclosure" list doesn't seem to disclose that, but it does appear that the malware is a kernel module masquerading as a sound driver.
If I'm right in that, then the infection vector must be a social-engineering attack to get an inexperienced sysad to install a driver for a new sound system he's bought. It's not clear how the modprobe occurs to load the kmod into the kernel, but these are the sort of things that tend to get noticed.
Given the nature of the infection, I wouldn't expect to see it on any mainline servers. The actual infection vector is the only thing of interest here, and it appears to be targetted at hobby servers only.
I'm not going to lose any sleep over this unless more worrying information comes to light.
Vic.
> But some method patents are valid.
I don't see many fitting into that category...
> A great deal or work, imagination and cleverness can go into working out a new way of compressing images
It can do, but most of that is grunt work; working out how to tune well-known algorithms to fit the sort of sequence you are expecting.
> MPEG-4 has methods by which it checks forward and backward to reference frames
So do most video compressors. That was old hat when I got into the industry. Even if it were patentable originally, that ship has long sailed.
> It's a lot of work.
It is[1]. But it's not a lot of *invention*. And patents cover invention, not sweat-of-the-brow labour.
> Should the people who worked hard on developing those solutions not be recompensed
They *are* being recompensed; the purpose of these standards is to sell encoding and decoding equipment. Standards are required to ensure that the market for such devices exists.
If I lay a road, that's a lot of work. Should you have to pay me for every journey you make over that road?
Vic.
[1] I did a fair amount of that work...
>> This is a a *true* decimal computer with counting by 10's built (literally) into the hardware.
> Still true of modern PCs and Macs!
No, not true of modern computers.
> Some 8-bit BCD instructions are buried in the 8086 instruction layer
Yes, but those are BCD instructions. The machine itself is a binary computer.
The machine in question is a *decimal* computer. Each storage node stores decimal values, not binary ones.
Vic.
> pragmatism on her part would suggest she simply take out the olives as she ate.
That might not be enough.
If she has some sort of reaction to the olives, the food might still make her ill even after removing the olives[1].
I have an explosive reaction to mushrooms. It's painful having to explain to waiters that I'm not going to accept this meal that they assured me was free from mushrooms, and I'm not going to pick them out as that will still make me ill.
Vic.
[1] If she does have a reaction to olives, it would make it a rather silly thing to do to go to a mediterranean-style restaurant. Nonetheless, that doesn't excuse the restaurateur's behaviour...
> I don't think there should be absolute unrestricted freedom of speech
I do.
However - and this is the important bit - I also believe that freedom comes with an associated responsibility towards others. So I *do* have the right to shout "Fire" in a crowded theatre[1], but if there is no such fire, I can expect to pay a heavy penalty for so doing.
Vic.
[1] Although I wouldn't actually do that - it's unlikely to get many people out of the door...
> look at how much they sell in the UK, minus what it costs to make that revenue
And that's exactly where the loophole exists.
What it "costs" to make that revenue includes things like the price of their *unique* ingredients, plus licencing fees to the global brand owner. The difference between what they take and what they pay is negligible - hence the tiny tax bill.
What's needed is to find a way to prevent excessive transfer pricing - but that's not a simple thing when you've got multiple legal entities trading across international borders, and it's even harder when some of the countries involved will bring significant political muscle to bear to protect "their" companies...
Vic.
> Is there any real secrecy in the BCC?
Yes, if you have physical control over your own kit.
> At what point in the process is the BCC information stripped out
At the oubound MTA.
> I wouldn't be a bit surprised to find out that the sysop of any server included in the
> list of addresses also has transient access to the complete list.
You'd be wrong.
> Secret? Email? Dream on, MacDuff
Email is as secure as you want it to be. For most people, that means "insecure", because securing it takes a little bit of work, and thinking is hard, apparently.
Vic.
> Quite possibly. I don't know the case
You don't know the SCO story?
Do go read up a bit.
> i think it quite likely IBM's strategy as it unfolded lead them to greater cost than was expected
I think you'd be wrong. IBM knew what it was doing. It stood its ground for very good reason.
> If IBM knew the cost of litigation would be higher than buying, don't you think they would have bought ?
No. IBM always knew the cost of litigation would be higher than buying. IBM had a point to prove, and it did so.
Vic.
> You need multiple antennas to support multiple bands
That's not *necessarily* true.
What we did years ago was to build trapped aerials - you insert one or more pairs of parallel tuned circuits into a longer antenna. At the resonant frequency of the trap, the outer bits are effectively disconnected (because the circuit goes high-Z), leaving you with the shorter antenna only.
Whether you could build a trapped antenna for a mobile phone is a question I'll leave to others with more recent experience...
Vic.
> I did try soft contact lenses many years ago
Contact lenses have changed quite a bit in recent years. I wear mine for a month at a time, and I rarely even remember they're there.
Once a month, I have to take them out. I wake up blind the next morning, and wonder what's gone wrong (for a couple of seconds, anyawy).
Vic.
> What Ellison is doing is stealing and whoring
Not it is not.
Oracle is *entitled* to do this. It is legal.
Oracle's motives are extremely suspicious, but you are simply wrong to say that this is theft - it is not. Oracle has a licence to convey these patches, as do I, as do you.
For once, Oracle is even shifting on some of its own work, to boot.
Vic.
> I can't see any basis for their comments apart from animosity towards AO.
Whilst such animosity is often warranted, I don't think yuo have to look that far in this case.
When someone seems to be defending the indefensible, it's often a good idea to look at his posting history. If substantially all those posts are in support of (or in opposition to) one company or other, it's a fair bet you've got a poster with an axe to grind.
It is left as an exercise to the reader to decide whether or not any particular poster has been paid to grind said axe...
Vic.
> it's a DESIGN patent.
It still needs to be of an appropriate subject matter. See http://forums.theregister.co.uk/post/1620156 above. "Clearly a design that simulates a well-known or naturally occurring object or person is not original as required by the statute. "
> About 99% of the above commentards ... need to educate themselves
Do you imagine yourself in the 1% that doesn't? I might have some bad news for you...
Vic.