Re: @Vic (was: @DAM (was: @Chris Miller))
> Are you really incapable of reading for content, Vic?
One of us is.
> I'm not arguing, I'm discussing
In this post, you said :-
Your "impact craters" on the nearside aren't a result of impact.
That's not discussion. That's assertion.
> Professionals are not infallible.
Indeed they are not. But when challenging a professional, it's always useful to provide some substantiation when stating baldly that he is wrong. You have provided no such substantiation, nor have you demonstrated any credentials in the field in question. Thus your opinion carries very little weight in opposition to someone who does this as a day job. If you want to gain that gravitas, you'll need to provide some justification for your contrary position.
Vic.