Re: WTF!?
Don't worry, Steam for Linux will be along right after hl3...
Oh. Bother.
5267 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Dec 2007
Or should all discrete graphics cards come with an "ultra-low-power" software switch which takes them down to integrated-graphics level? Splitting/switching the graphics between the main cpu and off-cpu seems like an inherently poor solution. Far better just to get nvidia (or AMD) drivers to handle the whole lot.
While I love a good MS bashfest as much as the next person, I have to think that this probably isn't as much of a deal as we like to think.
Corporate is MS' big market and they are likely to have both exchange and sharepoint. Re-allocating the cost between the two is unlikely to have an impact. I can't imagine share mailboxes being a massive feature - its calendaring and rights management in calendaring and mailboxes which are the killer features for exchange.
As far as metro goes, it might be ugly, but people will work around it. They'll put all their frequently used apps on the desktop or first metro page (as they do on phones) and get on with life. A recent upgrade to W7 is a far better reason not to do the upgrade than what the staff think of the UI.
Important to techies, not so important to business - at least not important enough to leave windows and the massive upheaval that would entail.
I suspect the reference is to the apparent addictiveness of porn and the fact that an often-repeated action is harder to stop. Porn provides a powerful reward system for the continued usage of (usually) women as pleasure objects. While all behaviour does rewire the brain, there are few behaviours with such powerful rewards.
While cause and effect are difficult to argue, there does appear to be a re-enforcing effect. If you cheat on taxes once, you are more likely to do it again. Every time you conciously choose not to smoke, it becomes easier to choose not to smoke again.
I would hazard a guess that "defining down" means lowering the bar for what is considered acceptable behaviour. There was a time in the relatively recent past when not breaking your promises to your partner to "love and to cherish, forsaking all others. til death us do part" was considered normal and a good thing. Now the reality is that "you'll do for the time-being." I fail to see how that cannot be degrading and is based on the selfish notion that love is something that happens *to* me, rather than being something I give to someone else.
There was plenty of war, rape & pillage around before the Church came along. The Vikings were somewhat famous for it. War, rape and pillage are the product of selfishness. Porn too is inherently selfish - its sex without responsability or the effort of a relationship. Is it any wonder that people give on the hard work relationships involve when it looks like fun is to be had without all that hassle?
While the Church shouldn't be defining decency, the Bible does stake the claim that it offers something better than secular society offers. Even talking purely of sex, secular experts suggest sex is better in a stable relationship, if slightly less adrenalin fueled. Random sex with strangers doesn't really cut it.
That said... dumb idea for a tablet...
AIO's are great for minimising the mess and cables in non-workplace environments - such as the home.
The downside is that no-one has done this well with standard ATX componants. Otherwise its just a large-screen laptop and you may as well get one and plug an external screen in. The HP Z1 starts down right road with upgradeable componants.
If the vendors could get their act together with being able to power down noisy graphics cards and switch dynamically to low-power built-in graphics and possibly clock-back the main CPU for ultra-quiet operation, we could get something nice going with systems hidden behind big 27" screens, but with "proper" big cpu oomph for gaming.
I suspect that a full ATX system could be clipped to the back of a 27" screen, plus a reasonably-sized disk array. Add a couple of bondable gig-e ports and you have nice home-server. I'd be happy to put a power-brick on the floor if required.
It's the neatness and quietness of AIO's combined with the bigscreen that you don't get in a normal laptop which makes them attractive.
A laptop+bigscreen is easier to handle and gives you a portable pc to boot, but an AIO could be a far more flexible solution, but currently they aren't.
I'm not sure we care too much about the actual temperature or climate.
What people worry about is how disruptive it would be to have the Thames burst its banks on a regular basis, leading to increased insurance claims. Our commercial desire for a static environment is what is at stake. In previous eras we would have just moved a bit further from the river. Now we have billions of GBP wrapped up in the river/sea level not rising and flooding.
Rather like the fact that we are hooked on house-price increases, we are hooked on property ownership which is difficult to move.
> How does this Cyberoam device get to read the trafffic?
If you tell your browser to trust it (because its your own device) you end up accidentally allowing all other cyberoam devices in the world to decrypt your traffic. Anyone else would need to be in the middle to get your traffic. A corrupt ISP minion might be enough.
I see the problem as being a lack of server infrastructre. Having a client does not compete with MS.
We need direct integration with an always-on always connected server and we need more options. For personal use, that usually means google for mail and calendar. Kmail/Kontact/Kalendar does this relatively well. Mozilla could perhaps fork out for some decent aesthetics if they want to support that. We also need IM and voip - which often means google again and (diminishingly) skype, but really should be SIP.
What would be handy would be a VM with all this bundled - email, SIP/IM, calendar etc for those who don't want to use a public service or who simply want to run their own infrastructure. Some load-balancing options wouldn't go amiss either so that companies can just add more servers with the same image, perhaps organised by bonjour or linux-ha or whatever for larger companies. Companies also need some wiki-like system if you want to avoid sharepoint.
Then you need a client which integrates all these well. Outlook does it does look reasonably good, but outlook without exchange is probably not a great proposition.
Integration is key - people need a complete working system (or at least see a working one) before jumping ship from a large vendor.
It isn't just tactical. Murdoch won't want a monopsony. You want competition everywhere except for yourself.
For most of Murdoch's customers a few pence at the railway station is a far lower barrier than handing over credit card details to a website.
Also remember that the newspaper's customers are the advertisers not the readers. He's more like Zuckerberg than a book writer.
Ideally you want customers to stay with you for some reason other than cost.
The bonus with clouds (and indeed the main reason to use a VM as far as I can tell) is hardware independence. I can migrate to a new faster bit of kit with absolutely minimal downtime.
This is what provides agility and reduces costs - better management.
> The only way the Euro is going to work is if there is a "big government" doling it out to the national governments, and taxing the people,
True. One currency can only work with one government. However, it can fail due to many different forms of fraud and disagreements.
The French wanted the EU to promote trade so the Germans wouldn't invade them again - they'd have too much to lose. However, there isn't much point doing that if you then give the Germans control by allowing them to out-vote you in a democracy.
If you think the current Greek unrest is bad, just wait until you have blond-haired and blue-eyed soldiers sitting on tanks as they roll into Athens to enforce EU law overriding the Greek parliament.
Despite the EU's pretense and social engineering (passports, drivers' licenses, flags, money) and America's lack of geographical and historical knowledge, Europe is not a country, it is not one people and Europeans tend to have a healthy disrespect for all government, especially empire-building ones. I can't imagine a European vowing to defend the president at all costs. How many people even know the name of the EU president, much less what his politics are. Even the name is just an abbreviation. Use the full "European Union" in context of any news and it becomes a painfully obvious oxymoron.
As someone once said, Europe is like a mix of iron and clay. Its going to take a lot more than global financial collapse to fix that.
> Setting or amending laws to reflect changing times and people is social engineering?
It could be, if you consistently push a message about what is and is not acceptable socially using carrots/sticks approach, without reference to what the recipients feel about the message, its social engineering.
That isn't to say its necessarily bad. Anti-slavery campaigners for instance - I would suggest that it is acceptable of state resources. Suggesting that the poor deserve everything they (don't) get, so we shouldn't help them? I'm happy to go along with attempting to reverse that idea. Redefining the term "marriage" to include relationships with animals? No, I don't think so.
>If you get there first, I think it's fair you should have some sort of protection.
Only if you have done something unique and non-obvious. IMHO making an existing device design larger so you can see more on the screen is relatively obvious, given that desktop screens have been getting larger for precisely the same reasons for many years.
Meh! Who cares about the underlying OS? (as long as we have bash, ssh and X available)
However, the GUI is a joy to use and knocks the socks off the two major tablet GUIs out in the market.
Did I say "tablet GUI"? They are really phone GUIs which have been scaled up.
The whole overlapping/sliding frame thingy would be great on a pc desktop too. Chrome? Is that you?
I have to admit that the apps are nowhere near as sophisticated as Android/IOS, but that's ok. The browser is fine, flash is fine (if you like that sort of thing), the screen is nice, the media streamer does pretty well with mp4/http.
I haven't found a killer app that would make me ditch it and I'm certainly not about to spend $850 getting a higher resolution device.
The direct costs would be: we can't afford a legal fight so we'll just pay up, despite the patent probably being invalid or non-applicable.
Since these are patents, its quite possible that the company did its own R&D which it paid for and then it had to pay someone else again for the the right to use its own research.
Indeed, the tablet's strengths are "always on, ultra-portable and compact interface," (no keyboard, mouse) and that was only possible when Apple broke the "desktop" GUI paradigm which prevailed on computers (and attempts at smartphones) up until that point. But "no keyboard" is utterly inappropriate for typing 300 page tenders. Low power cpus are utterly inappropriate for WYSIWYG re-pagination of said documents. 10" screens are horrible for dealing with large documents or pulling together information from lots of sources.
+1
Catalyst: something which causes change, without itself being affected.
So W8 will still be an abomination which few people use, but it will drive others to use tablets?
The man may be a visionary!
Until someone hits F5 in their spreadsheet, or ARM gets around to producing desktop CPUs.
Its service delivery's job to get in the way until everyone is satisfied that all the information is processed. They are basically a fallback because we all know the documentation is not up to date. It also turns out that "getting things working" is not worth risking other revenue/services for.
The problem is worse with consolidated systems. I suspect more money is lost long term on management of consolidated systems than is gained by saving a few million on additional hardware.
If live tv is so bad that people are not concentrating on the stuff they do want (the programme) what makes people think they will stay around for stuff they don't want?
Here's my suggestion: Tiny ARM-based storage device which can stream in pretty much any format. Paid-for, ad-free content. The price drops if you are willing to join in a p2p cloud rather than direct-download. This can supplement the ad-infested FTA version so people can try-before-they-buy. Make a browser plugin which can do meta-data to the device, allowing bookmarking, chapters, skipping etc. Add a login facility for restricted access: you probably don't want your 5-year old watching GoT.
Given that any content will hit the torrents and fileshares anyway, you probably won't be losing revenue by not using DRM, but you will lose revenue if you make access too hard or too costly.
The main issue would be security - you don't want user's devices hacked. Burn a tiny utility into ROM which goes out, grabs the md5 sum of the image and checks it and then flags up a warning if it doesn't match the official images.
Its easy, it bypasses the entrenched cable providers and assuming most people are happy with sharing a bit of bandwidth, doesn't require the Beeb's, Apple's or Google's bandwidth to provide content.
Making things more expensive by default for some people is rarely seen as "good" by those people.
Customers nearly always hate differentiation. We like to think we are paying a fair rate, which is generally thought of as cost+reasonable profit.
Recently in Melbourne the "normal" tomatoes have looked rather unripe in the shops. However, next to them in the supermarket are some nice red mini-tomatoes at x4 the price/kg. I find it really unlikely that the cherry tomatoes actually cost x4 the normal ones. Given the massive pricing swings in goods in Oz, I suspect a bit of price manipulation or at least profiteering.
Sorry kids, we are having canned tomatoes, shipped around the world from Italy, which are organic and are still cheaper than the canned ones grown locally.
No-one likes to feel manipulated into paying more. I suspect that the big loser here will be orbitz, as iphone users stop using it.
That's what happens when you mine data - it suggests strategies you really shouldn't follow.
Precisely. Since you failed to abide by our laws while in your own country, we will arrest you as soon as you set foot in ours. In fact, you had better self-censor unless you are fluent all the laws in all the countries you might visit.
Ah! Isn't life peaceful now?
The Americans take it a bit further though, by trying to get other countries post them people they don't like so they can be prosecuted in the US.
Personally I prefer the import/export model. The "publishing" model is a flawed analogy and implies distribution for demand is known (like books/newspapers) rather than a copy sent only on request. If its illegal, go after the importer. However, as the RIAA et al have discovered, that's just annoyingly time-consuming and difficult.
Worse is the implication that checkpoint can secure you against general threats.
There is no saving a fool with a browser and admin rights (or a buggy OS).
A basic firewall takes care of most incoming connections and how many people can spot a dangerous outgoing one in amongst all the torrent traffic, Steam updates or google suggestions?
Isn't tb just external PCIe? Why does a two port sata card + thunderbolt cost 250+?
Give me a chassis with 6 disks slots which can stack with another one and you *might* have earnt your 250.
In the meantime, can you LACP the $29 ethernet adapters and use iscsi to your own private server? You could run more smaller disks or even share it with the person next to you.
Having worked in IT in a non-UK bank, my guess is that all the banks are held together with spit and an elastic band.
DR kit is always under-resourced or merged with the test environment or some such thing. There are far too many custom data interfaces which don't have any DR and can't be failed over, so the bank never does a full DR test and it never does a full test in the test environment.
I've seen whole sections of a bank run on ancient flat-file databases where the db vendor and the db app developer went out of business over a decade ago. I've seen plenty of "here's our DR app server - it connects to the "master" db back at the main data-centre."
The prevailing attitude is "its mission critical, don't touch it" rather than, "its mission critical, make sure you have the documented the business logic and can reproduce it." If DR is substandard, don't implement it until you've got financial sign-off for remediation.
Part of the problem is that we demand so much from "enterprise" systems in terms of flexibility, that we fail to implement what is important. You need a proper working DR which is regularly and frequently tested. If that's scary, it should be a sign that your DR isn't up to standard. If internal personnel don't have faith in what is going on, why should i? Perhaps working and demonstrable DR should be a requirement of a banking license?
For the individual, what's the lesson? Get multiple bank accounts, get a credit card, even if you don't think you need it. Trust no one. Check your own single points of failure.
and they would continue, "You can tell us in either, because our school system teaches youngsters their 12 times table, rather than relying on counting fingers and toes as your metric system seems to do."
"We also use precise astronomy to determine our seasonal boundaries. We're quite surprised you've lost the ability to do the same."
Thunderbolt? I'd like that! Though possibly still not enough to give up android.
Induction charging and bluetooth audio has to be the killer combo for on the go use - no cables required. Just as long as you don't need to go through half a dozen menus to configure it.
Also want: "pair and connect to closest bluetooth adapter," please.
MS' problem is that people expect Office on a tablet but they certainly aren't going to pay full price for it.
So how do you stop companies using them as cheap (possibly remote) desktops? You could tie the tablet Office license to a full-blown Office license but that would kill the home market. "Free for non-commercial use" perhaps, or hobbled?
My guess is that for business use, people don't use tablets much (though they do want work email/calendar on a phone however so they can be reminded of things on the road or while walking to an appointment). If I were MS, I'd be pushing pc with a hi-res detachable screen and a teeny tiny atom inside. Sell that as a work laptop and users can take it home in the evening (perhaps just the screen) and have their tablet for free. Metro+free probably trumps ipad+expensive for most people.
If its the screen and battery which is expensive, re-use your work pc for that bit and get it for free. Beats BYOD for the company and beats paying out for an ipad for the employee.
There were twenty-minute programme segments followed by three twenty-second ads and back to the programme. Perhaps that's wishful thinking, but I'm sure you had to rush to put the kettle on.
With short ad-breaks it is hardly worth turning away. Put on 6 45-second ads, two of which are the same and there is no way I'm sticking around.
Everything in our house gets PVR'd. It isn't only pleasant but removes the tv as a common form of entertainment for the kids (no big-screen in the lounge). Occasionally, if we have to watch live or on catchup-tv, there are constant comments about having forgotten how awful live tv is. Even if something is on while we want to watch it, we'll pick something else until its over half-way through, so we don't have to endure the not-just-long but unappealing adverts. Australian networks especially seems to have no idea how a story's flow can be ruined by an ad-break.
An unintended and interesting side-effect of a pvr is that we are reducing our TV viewing. We don't watch spontaneously or turn it on just to see what's on. We'd probably be inclined to watch more if it wasn't such a terrible experience.
Process migration across cores and low power cores for when the system isn't doing much.
How about some power-saving graphics cards which go to sleep (and put their fans to sleep) when the screen is off/sleeping?
I know, way off topic, but personally, I'd rather have lots of cpus/blades with excellent power management than all that expensive virtualisation software need to manage things now that they have been virtualised.
> They were (and maybe still are) great in entreprise grade really big iron, but other then that ...
But that should be a profitable niche, were it not for the fact that some enterprises who used to buy their own kit now just outsource the whole lot - often to oracle.
x86 management is still rubbish in comparison. SPARC haven't been performance leaders for ages, but a consumer-grade x86 chip will also knock the socks off a server-grade x86 chip in terms of performance. Reliability matters in some cases, but as the volume of data grows the less important any one bit of that data is seen to be and it all gets swallowed in generic outsourcing deals at which point the people who really need uptime have lost control of the machine and all that matters are the SLAs.
A well reasoned, non-politically-biased, hysteria-free, non-troll-bait article from elreg!
I haven't seen that since the great y2k "don't panic" article of 2001!
Sadly I suspect that there is no logical middle-ground between the copyright forever and zero copyright for me groups. Whatever happens, the internet will allow the transfer of bits & bytes. There is rather little that can be done to offer a carrot to the copyright holders to reduce their rather successful lobbying which don't involve voters anyway. I can't imagine people ever voted for the extended copyright at any point. It's all down to campaign funds.