Re: Windows is a mindset...
Windows is a network of systems. Trying to untangle them is very difficult - don't expect any license savings until the last windows requirement is gone. Staged migrations from windows do not provide a quick ROI.
5267 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Dec 2007
> The Office market wants a full fat Office and is prepared to pay for it
True. Sadly, they won't get full fat office on MS' tablet either. I see disappointment there and that will probably hurt MS more. They should have released a very hobbled version of office for ipad to get people used to a reduced feature set and upped the capabilities for their own tablet.
Mac's have gone from an "all-in-one" to "lots of adapters needed."
It isn't the cost (galling though that is), its the fact that now you need a laptop bag instead of just picking up the computer and going. Going on holiday and want to use it to watch films? Pack your DVD drive and USB adapter and HDMI adapter, you external drive of films (because they don't fit on the little internal one)...
If it was "better" (such as flash replacing floppy) I'd understand it, but it isn't. If it was just an ultraportable Air, I'd understand it, but it isn't.
I know, its off topic regarding the 13" possibility, but I need to express my disgust.
Locked down is fine when you can split the phone between personal and business. I don't want the IT dept hassling me because I put vlc-remote on the phone, but neither do I want them to stop me doing it.
It seems that innovation isn't dead after all and it isn't all about the apps.
Good luck to BB with this one, even if some of their new features aren't new anymore. :)
The question is, can I have two sim cards as well?
What you really want is a phone with a fingerprint and retina scan camera that works as a dumb terminal as long as it can is able to scan your retina, while you are holding your thumb on the scanner and you have entered a passphrase (to allow duress flagging). And you'll need a sealed unit with all sorts of electronic checks to make sure that the electrical properties of the screen haven't changed (someone mirroring the screen to a remote device) etc.
In short, mobile comms is very difficult to secure. Much easier to get someone to meet you at the bottom of the 99 Steps.
SSD for the OS only seems to be a good idea to me, though you have to be careful about the default locations of mysql databases.
I have a host which dual-boots windows (for games) and linux (for everthing else) and SSD would be great for that. While some games could benefit from a disk speed increase, I suspect its nothing that a decent raid5 disc array couldn't sort out for me.
Linus does Linux because Linus enjoys doing Linux. Windows sales are not relevant to him.
I saw Windows for sale in an Office shop the other day - $445 (cough, splutter), and not a bit of interesting character either!
One way to "do it different" is to stop the plethora of protocols talking between third parties for so many reasons.
Dead-dropping data makes it easier to check and takes out dodgy^H^H^H^Huntested proprietary protocols.
Not a panacea, but a step in the right direction. This is where things like PCIDSS fail. As long as you don't control the product, you're "allowed" not to look inside the protocol.
How about a cpu which can mostly power down or switch to a low power core to run a desktop in file-server mode with graphics off and just enough power to run disks and network? You could run your main disk access through an onboard ARM mini-server and present disk to host and network as iscsi.
You could have a monitor which does dual vertical A4 pages at a reasonable size.
You could put a tablet OS in monitors.
You could put voip/dect in your screens which doesn't need a full pc to work.
Hi-def, long (100m) range optical video links for PC-TV integration / Lightpeak.
etc.
Indeed, a proper computer pwns all.
However, does anyone know of a video card with an RF out so you can pump a full HD video output signal down a bit of coax to the TV's normal aerial connector? HDMI is too short when you have noisy disk arrays or an ugly case.
Your software might be great, but what if HP comes along and lashes x86 hardware together with the same IOPS? You no longer have the skills to design new cpus that are better than what HP can put together. You're on a more even playing field, with only the interconnects and software to differentiate.
Steam doesn't need a locked down platform, it operates quite well on Windows and Mac; there's no reason it should do worse on Linux.
Valve's problem is that Apple and MS seem to be moving more to a closed model. Valve don't want that and neither do the other game vendors since they have no intention of coughing up 30% to Apple or MS in order to sell on their respective platforms. Given the home-market target of gaming it makes sense for Valve to go linux and provide a distro/app delivery service. The home market is less demanding and lock-in via complexity is less of an issue, as Apple are currently showing MS in the upper end of the home market.
The game vendors don't need linux to be a resounding success, just enough of a threat that MS won't be willing to annoy customers with a locked-down environment.
> "their equipment sends unauthorized amounts of data to China late at night."
Let me get this straight, they authorised 10k of data to be sent but not 15k?
If your routers have internet access, your firewall admins need to be fired. Either you want and accept support, or you turn it off. You don't have one password across all platforms, right? You do use centralised authentication and avoid putting passwords on individual routers, right? All router data transfers go via a server where you examine the content, right?
Some people think "protectionism" is referring back to older practices of official state policy rather than tossing favours to large corporate buddies.
Who cares about the OS? If AMD can break the barrier between dedicated proprietary tablet hardware and x86 then good for them. Perhaps someone can then contribute some power-saving software tech back into the desktop linux kernel rather than hiding it in proprietary systems, all the better.
Let's hope its a bit more price-competitive than atom in the consumer market.
No-one has ever seen a metaphor in a song before?
Literalism is a larger problem than I thought.
However, my experience with the US university system is that the correct answer is the one which matches the wording in the textbook. Any thought at all is discouraged. That was in a Comp-Sci degree, so its probably a cultural rather than religious problem.
What's wrong with water?
This does sound like Tesco complaining that some people come in and only buy bread and milk (loss leaders), or Ryan Air complaining that you always check-in online and only bring hand luggage.
If you don't want to to sell something, don't sell it. Don't have a sale and complain that people only bought items on sale.
> now -> touch -> glasses -> natural language
Haha! Natural language is works using a massive amount of heuristics (aka guessing) which is pretty much the last thing you want from a computer when you are ordering some new servers.
This is why written language is normally more formal and we usually even ditch that and use forms and codes with very precise meanings.
> "Windows is priced correctly, and not all that bad"
> Wow, there's a ringing endorsement if I ever heard one. Have Microsoft PR been in touch for their new ad campaign?
I think they used it for the Vista, "I'm too much of a loser to afford a mac" adverts. I don't agree with the sentiment, but that seemed to be what the adverts were trying to say.
Given that google knew this was coming, they should have pulled *all* there apps from ios6 and run a huge advertising campaign. Or got Samsung to run one for them.
You want to compete against your suppliers? Fine, do all your own work.
You want to access youtube from ios6? Here, have a flash copy of the video... ;)
Virtualised database servers?
Don't really want that, as the license & support costs of multiple servers will eat through any savings on idle CPUs & electricity.
Surely you'd just put multiple db's on the server without virtualisation (or with just one VM, for hardware independence).
While it might be fun to stack'em high, watching them fall is less amusing. If you have lots of virtualised systems it makes sense to spread them out over more, cheaper systems. It also allows 1-many failover which means you have better utilisation than a mirrored pair with 50% idle.