Re: Utter nonsense
Obvious troll is...
5267 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Dec 2007
> Look at how much they nobbled the atom platform (Netbooks limited to 2GB RAM) just because they were afraid of their low price experiment cutting into the desktop share.
This will continue to be their problem. The question is whether ARM will nobble them or whether they will nobble themselves. The two big phone makers are vertically integrated. Why would they want to hand intel a slice of profit? It's as much a commercial issue as a technical one - even if Intel became better, they will not accept the miniscule margins ARM holdings run on, so they will be more expensive.
Racism is a modern sin. Apparently its worse to treat someone badly if they look slightly different from yourself, if they have a darker skin-tone than yourself, than if they are the same or lighter.
I don't really get that. Abuse is abuse and I have no time for "grading" an evil action based on motivation. It is not better to beat someone in order to take their wallet than it is to beat them because they are foreign.
I don't care about your colour or your slave's colour. Slavery is wrong.
It is both bad parenting (the main defense) and mass media (the main attack) which is to blame. The media has pushed more and more adult oriented material packaged up for kids as they use shock tactics to impress the under-aged and drive a wedge between children and those who really do know better.
Does anyone remember when Madonna's antics caused outrage? Now Miley and Thicke get mostly faux horror at miming sex between a young girl and a married man, live on stage at a mainstream music industry awards ceremony.
Anyone remember when "The Sullivans" was the lunchtime soap? Now we have vast amounts of partner-swapping, sexual-infidelity and more unusual sexual relationships put front and centre on the TV. This makes extraordinarily broken relationships the normal thing that children see. It is right that children should be able to expect and demand integrity, truthfulness and fidelity. When all the characters they see lie and cheat in turn, their expectations of others and themselves are diminished and they are worse off for it.
Certainly the "bad" parts of the internet are unpleasant and not for children, but the real damage is done by mainstream media and the inability of parents to say, "this whole TV/music thing is inappropriate."
As an example, how many times have I seen the Macarena done at children's parties? Is it just my dirty mind, or are the actions (contrary to the lyrics?) miming, "take my hand, come with me, hug/cuddle, lie back, have sex, move on/turn to your next partner?" The toddler's don't know what's going on and there's no harm done at the time, but at what point do you say to your kid, "actually the dance I taught you in this video is about things you shouldn't be doing?" The problem is that this sort of thing is so pervasive that it is almost impossible to participate in popular culture. We've got rid of all big screen TV's (any TV for grown-ups has to be recorded on the server and is played at low volume on a laptop after the kids are in bed) and the radio stays on classic fm. Wagner may have been a little decadent, but he doesn't have a dance on yourtube where he mimes adult spanking.
You've missed the point.
This is about trialling network level filtering for commercial reasons in a manner which won't immediately provoke outrage.
The continued existence of most of the mass media aimed at children on TV and on the radio (without technological filters), is proof these measures are not what they purport to be.
> This would be a tax on revenue but the UK operates a system that taxes profits.
That's fine, but with the profit to revenue ratio being so small, they have no reserves to cope with problems, which is the reason small contractors are usually excluded.
Don't tell me you are a stable company if you make tiny profits.
> 'IT Managers hate iPads'? Only those in the stone age.
So far they are mostly BYOD which brings conflict between the owner of the network and the device owner.
I recently had a client who had a policy of not providing kit to contractors (fair enough), but then they wanted to install their own management software on BYOD kit.
er... no thanks.
The issue is probably a cultural one.
Coming from a PC background, the overwhelming response to the PS4 is, "how much effort did it take to make something so crippled?"
They appear to have put effort into removing features, not just been negligent about adding them. I think that is what puts them on the "do not buy" list - a lack of trust that Sony is trying to make a good product for my benefit. Most people see an optical drive and assume it will work. If you are playing DVD's, you've probably hooked it up to your lounge stereo, in which case, why not play CD's too? There is something soulless about scanning a music library and creating a playlist on a computer.
Yes. The point being that a default on setting would be so ubiquitous that ad agencies would ignore it, rendering it pointless.
The idea is to offer a little bit of hope to those who can be bothered.
Personally, I suspect flashblock, noscript and always using incognito is probably your best bet.
> it simply means the ads we see are more relevant to our needs/wants, and that's not evil either.
Which is true in theory. It works until you find out how they determine our needs/wants.
Then you find them thoroughly intrusive and veering towards evil. There's nothing wrong with ads per se, its the ad-broker activities which people really object to.
> But why use the PI to do it?
The Pi's strengths are cheap/portable/electrical interaction with other devices.
You can hook it up to a motion sensor and doorbell and it isn't so expensive that you can't leave it there. It won't replace a pc for general computing but the level of general computing has risen so far its hard to inspire kids to compete with teams of hundreds of adults. The benefit is in little cool things where someone can say, "I did that!"
> Sure, getting wiped out of the processor market would hurt a lot, but Intel have many very well developed facets, so I don't think they'll vanish, although it is certain they will evolve. :)
The issue would be PC manufacturers putting cheap ARM chips into PC's as an "always-on" option. People might stop booting home PCs to check email, etc and it would drive desktop linux/arm application development, which might then impact intel quite a bit more.
Actually a c2d is more than adequate for a "family computer." I have a 2009 2.6Ghz 24" imac (with a dvd drive!) which runs email with 10k+ messages, web, MS Office, skype, video, voip, ebook server etc with no problems at all.
I did upgrade the RAM to 8G recently (/me thumbs nose at newer mac owners...) which made things run quite a bit better and the nvidia 9400 will never be for 3d games, but it is almost silent and a pleasure to use with snow leopard. I've got a network server running debian so I probably won't bother upgrading the disk (I rarely reboot the thing), but an SSD is an option. Perhaps it was the last of the decent "all-in-ones".
I don't normally upgrade critical machines unless I need to. That makes life more pleasant and things tick along just fine.
I like the bleeding edge.
MythTV - now at v0.27
But yes, when there are commercial factors at play, you don't jump in. I think it must be the casino effect of lit buttons/screen. When a button comes up which says, "press me to get stuff" people do so without thinking.
>> Steve would not have let this happen
>Yes he would. Wasn't slowly turning OSX into iOS one of his master plans in the first place?
I doubt it. The thing Apple got right was that you can't stick a keyboard/mouse interface on a phone, something MS has been trying (and failing) to do for ages. If they have forgotten that lesson, their design prowess is shallower than I thought.
Having said that, I'm sure they dream of the day they might return to proprietary silicon, so moving OSX towards ARM via iOS shouldn't be off the cards.
Rest assured that the PHB needed that executive car because it takes at least an hour to get in or out of Wokingham from around 3pm onwards.
Wokingham, also home to Azlan (or whatever they are now) who used to do very fine food on their CNE training courses. Proper ginger pudding with custard!
The other part of the equation is the wire-tapping and use of international cooperation to get around your own laws. China can tap its own infrastructure, but asking the UK, Australia and USA to filter off traffic for it to analyse probably wouldn't get it very far. China's reach into critical parts of the internet is rather more limited than the West's.
No problems with Mail here, including google interaction. Oh wait... Snow Leopard.
Please excuse my smugness as a peer around the side of my imac screen and pop in a DVD to watch.
Look Ma! No messy cables - I've got an all-in-one computer!
Razor blades. They're shiny too, but we don't jump on them as soon as we see them.
(We need a proper *smug* icon)
> QoS aspects are part and parcel of connectivity.
True, but the solution is for QoS to be applied per protocol not per vendor. Stupid vendors try to stick everything over http and mess everything up, but that's their problem.
Vendors also like to stream without caching in the name of DRM. That's dumb too.
> use some restraint.
Haha! Vendors telling customers not to buy their stuff!
Oh, and the other option (download beforehand) also makes me laugh. In the new economic order you aren't allowed to possess, only receive a transient licensed stream.
Also, where are they getting their 1.2Gb films from? ;)
> If the chance was 100 billion billion to 1 before the event happened. After the event happen the chance was 1:1, it's the other 999999...:1 things that didn't happen.
Which event? The genetic mutation? Not being eaten by an owl? Finding a mouse-mate with matching genes? How many times did that genetic mutation occur without all the other factors being in place?
With the lack of mice relative to the odds, this looks like homeopathy. I'm well, therefore homeopathy works. Since it exists, it did evolve. Against any odds, evolution is the cause because we have already removed all other options from consideration.
Overdone but basically correct.
Non-rich people are not mobile and they don't have mobile money. They are also the majority. Its the majority who pay tax because, well, people are taxed in general.
I'd be far more concerned about the disastrous amounts of debt the government is running up on our behalf. That has a great deal more certainty and is a lot closer than global climate disaster.