If you fight with force
You become like that which you fight
5267 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Dec 2007
Banning abortion? What? People think killing babies is wrong? How backward is that! The ancient Greeks and Romans thought that was ok, and that was way before the 17th century.
Teaching an alternative theory of the origins of life on earth? Ah yes, that's just like beheading people who oppose your rule and hiding half the population under tent-clothes while the other half can do as they wish. In the name of freedom, we must smash (or censor) those who don't agree with us.
How much more civilised we are, sending our armies off to foreign lands where they can wreak havoc on them undeserving heathens, killing them, so that they don't have to endure the dreadful atrocities their leaders inflict on them.
I think I'll just pop the kettle on for myself and spend the five minutes chopping the veggies for supper. Perhaps I could ask the kids to help so that I can chat to them while we do stuff together.
Its why the IoT will fail. It solves no problem. The metro system can't cope with my bank card being next to my rail card. What's the likelihood the fridge can sort out the jumble of food that's stuffed in it? Food in paper bags and food in plastic bags which have been re-used. Unlike Android, setting up stuff to snoop on my home is likely to be way more expensive than simple mechanical devices and far more trouble for me. I may be willing to pay for "cool tech" but I'm not going to pay for tech which makes things harder for me.
There's also a lack of benefit from the cloud for this. I may allow google to rifle through my mail because they are good at storing email and making it available to me. They also take the security headache away. IoT not so much. I already have music on my phone - I don't need locational awareness to follow me around the house playing music, I'll wear headphones. It may be a marketer's dream and Cisco's dream but I've never had a hankering for it. I may have all my music in Amarok, but I like pulling a CD out and putting it into the CD player. I don't want Christmas to mean scrolling down to the "seasonal" genre in the playlists. I want to buy Christmas tree, bring it home and set it up, not have it stored in a built-in cupboard and pop out fully decorated with this years holographic baubles when a cronjob kicks off on 1st December.
There are a few things which make sense, but I think having the airconditioning run on a timer is just fine, I don't need it internet connected. Apart from anything else, in hot weather my router tends to lock up. I can turn the light switch on by myself - programming it to match what mood I'm in is more trouble than its worth. Plus, what dreadful things might happen if I'm almost home... and then decide to go out for pizza?
W8 is now a marketing liability for MS regardless of how technically good it is. W10 will be brought in asap. More W7'ish in interface, more cloudy underneath. Pick your poison.
Personally I find both systems obscure and hide too much. W7 has a usable menu, but I find it easier to pin browser, control panel, file explorer and major apps to the taskbar in order to avoid the start menu.
I just find admin things too hard in Windows. I have a dhcp/tftp/http server combination on which I can dump linux ISOs. Yes, I can dump an ISO on a web server and install an OS from it. Bingo, instant network installation/upgrade mechanism with standard protocols. Now, network install with Windows? There's probably an app for that - some custom thing that will change from version to version. Might have to pay for it. It looks really complicated. Network boot? Now you're having a laugh! You want to boot off an ISO on web server and run the OS from it?
MS just seem to make easy things hard so they you become reliant on their software to do it for you. Obviously you need a The Microsoft Windows 3000 network installation and patching server! Er, no thanks. But we have Special Technology to slowly transfer patches across your WAN links for distribution! You mean like a private torrent with a bandwidth cap?
Don't get me wrong, the Windows desktop is very robust - perhaps more so than Linux's, but they don't seem to have moved much beyond making a really good version of W3.11 It is still very much a client with the server side costing big(ger) bucks. At least with 3.11 you felt MS were doing they best they could, now they hold things back because licensing differences can make it more profitable. Apple are doing the same with hardware - removing features not because its expensive to leave them in, but to protect the higher-end products.
How do we know the photo subject wasn't the one getting revenge by privately agreeing to the photo upload and then denying it afterwards?
Do not take pictures of yourself naked. Don't allow other people to do that. If they do it without your knowledge, I'm sure there are laws covering that already. Actually, don't get naked for someone who will leave you. Crazy I know, but sex outside marriage is a very high-risk activity which leaves you open to abuse. Entering into a legally-binding agreement to "forsake all others until death us do part"- provides an indication of how highly your partner esteems you and dramatically reduces the risk of you being abused.
I did not have Johnny Appleseed paint a portrait of me holding an axe above my head while standing on said tree-stump, I did not paste it into the book of faces, neither did I sell the cherries and the firewood for profit and keep the records on the USB stick.
I have one of these. (v2) Not so impressed.
It tends to randomly reboot. Line drops are relatively frequent (not sure which end is at fault). I've heard rumours of VPNs but mine doesn't seem to serve them or run any of the third-party router OSes.
I'll try a second-hand Cisco 800 I picked up for five quid.
> But you forgot to factor in the cost of...
Still a lot cheaper than a tablet.
But not as cheap as textbooks, which could be re-used year after year and kept in a library. Not only that, but you can open them and see two sides of A4 at one time and the DPI is great.
Maybe you could approach a teacher or university lecturer and offer them 400k to write a book for you which you then own. Put it into epub and kindle formats as well as printing them, and maybe put them on a wiki open to academics and viewable by all.
Stop forcing up the cost of education with unnecessary, expensive and fragile gadgets.
> it's already the de facto standard, and it ain't going anywhere.
I agree with that, I suspect the question behind the doubters is, "is Azure going anywhere or will this just be used to authenticate Exchange clients?" I suspect they are confusing "AD for Azure replaces AD for corporate use" with "Azure wins teh internet and cloud."
Would it be more accurate to say that some fats are ok as long as you actually burn them off?
Aren't both fat arnd carbs energy, with carbs being converted to fat if you don't burn them?
The problem with articles like these is that whether or not they are correct, what most people see is, "fat is ok" and carry on consuming too much in general.
I saw an TV programme which ran along a similar vein, looking at bush firefighters and the food intake mode which allowed them to function "at their peak." (a fairly continuous supply of high-calorie food). The problem was that they were implying that that food consumption mode *made* you function at your peak, rather than *allowing* you to function at your peak. That sort of thing is fine for the physically active, but that is probably not most of the people watching.
Most people's problem is too much energy input for their given output. My guess is most people know how to improve their health, they just don't care enough to do much about it. It isn't so much a question of carbs or fat, but carbs and fat, in the form of macaroni-cheese. I spent years eating pasta and cream & chease/sauce, pancakes with syrup and it was all fine, right up until the kids came along and the gym visits stopped.
Will (or won't) power is the hard bit. Personally, I find a simple formula works - eat almost exclusively plants and process them myself as far as possible without being militant about it. Also, keep the volume of food down. I know I could get far more scientific about it, but a large part of my problem is keeping my palette trained to enjoy simple rather than processed food. Keeping off processed food actually seems to dull my appetite for the desert buffet - I enjoy they stuff I used to pass over and feel little need for anything sweeter than a date.
I had a similar issue in Oz. They wanted me to do a factory reset of the router. I baulked and baulked and finally did it to humour them.
It all came back - I have rarely been that embarrassed. That netgear is being replaced with a proper cisco...
I haven't actually ruled out them waiting until they saw the line go down to reset things at their end, but generally Westnet a quite good.
Never in the history of computing has so much effort been made by so many to fix problems of their own making.
Question: if Vmware can make sure software processes don't crash each other, why can't Microsoft?
Would it not makes sense for MS to change their packaging so apps and config are not mixed with the os?
I'd rather have a robust os with simple app configuration storage than powershell or a touch interface.
On a more interesting note, why not torrent desktop updates between end clients? Then the more clients logging in at 9am the faster the updates are distributed.
Alas for having only one upvote to give.
The fact that there are so many old systems out there is testament to the fact that upgrades are not required for many people.
After W8, perhaps MS need to reconsider the "sell a new version" strategy and sell fixes and maintenance instead. The OS upgrade cycle seems to be specifically designed to introduce incompatibilities and force the wholesale upgrade of applications. It brings a whole new meaning to the term "monolithic OS."
Actually, with all the virtualisation tech in place, now is an excellent time for BSD/Linux devs to write enterprise software and ship it as a soft appliance. If I were writing a new "Exchange", that's what I'd be doing.
>For example, there's a report on a prominent mafia trial where a contemporary news report wrongly associates an innocent person to the crimes.
But I don't think this is the common usage, is it?
My concern would be that I would rather have wrong information returned by my search engine, than one that has been massaged by money or politics. How long until we get a request that Google removes all links which "brings the government/company into disrepute"?
It is tragic for those maligned, but I think there is a better way. Rather than removing the links, how about flagging links which have successfully gone through an arbitration process with an "inaccurate" flag. That puts greater pressure on the originating website to remove the data if they don't stand by it, rather than have their name associated with being wrong. Plus it provides some correction to previous inaccurate reporting.
It also removes the "censorship" criticism and the ability for people to get information removed because they are embarrassed about their previous conduct.
I joined a telco unix/security team in the late 1990's / early 2000's. The balance was 50/50 with a female tech lead. By the time I left, there was one female left in the team.
Interestingly, historically, blue was a girls colour and all babies (male and female) were referred to as "girls." (caveat: source=QI)
My take is that the nature of IT attracts the socially incompetent and that turns off many women, whom I suspect are wired differently. There are lots of techies you would never put in front of a customer. Its similar to the ability to climb to the top of the political pole or CEO role. Anyone could do it, but those that do tend to be backstabbing liars with a slight autistic bent. I suspect that you can also pay the socially incompetent less and ask them to work longer hours.
Unless there are loads of out-of-work female IT job seekers, I wouldn't worry. Personally, I'd probably hire women over men - I don't understand the idea that men would rather be with men than women.
It probably isn't that Win8 is as bad as the figures suggest, its just a first-past-the-post decision with the two large ecosystems taking the vast majority, leaving little reason to go W8.
If MS want to do well, it has to be a free tablet bundled with the laptop, to build the ecosystem. They can afford to play the long game here. Even the Win8 failure is not the end for them. Win10 on all laptops which have morphed into convertibles with detachable screens could get them there eventually.
What MS really needs is their OS to boot nicely from the same system image on different hardware. Linux LiveCD anyone? Then people could take an NGFF disk from their i7 PC and clip it to the back of their "Surface certified" tablet/phone (which may also ship with/run Android) when they are moving rather than creating or plug it into their home PC if they want. No you won't use photoshop on a tablet, but outlook might be ok. The flash disk could clip onto the back of a phone like a battery pack. You might need a little slider switch on the tablet that says, "conserve power, I'm just watching a film / Ya cannae break the laws of physics, Captain" so people can work on a Word document with the battery lasting the one hour train ride from the office to home. The tablet could be the screen from their office laptop. Of course, just because the OS boots on different hardware doesn't mean the exact same versions of all the apps need to run - we just need to make sure the OS doesn't fall over because the hardware has changed. I wonder where MS could get that kind of tech?
In other words, MS needs to invest in the OS and in the hardware tech to make laptops and tablets better, not spend oodles on marketing, desperately trying to convince people to buy their stuff which is less than "me too."
>why exactly would anyone pay 2.5x the price for the latest Galaxy S when it is running identical software?
That is why its tanking. We don't mind paying more if the thing is better but the software differentiation is not enough to make it worth that much more. They need to stop matching Apple and make the best phone hardware they can.
That means - put an SD card slot in it, look at making an aluminium casing, invest in the Kies stuff to make it usable - maybe PoE/mini-DVI for thin-client work. Get some sync going for people with itunes libraries to ease that transition. If they are not good at the UI (which Kies suggests) put some effort into Android itself. Pump some money into Android security projects, make it (or Tizen) properly multiuser based on thumbprint.
It often strikes me that manufacturers do a bit of work and then stop making an effort, especially with sync software.
+1 Mint may look prettier out of the box (what where the Suse 13.2 chaps thinking?) but on a day-to-day basis I found suse to be more robust (than Ubuntu), not least for "not-borking-the-install" when adding new software.
I'm not sure what the hate for KDE4 is all about. It was woefully undersupported by apps when introduced, but unless you have an s3 virge...
If you're looking for an *office* desktop system, all the widgets are generally a good thing. Yes, a calendar on the toolbar is a good plan. For server or low power systems, stick XFCE or LXDE on there.
>Their desperate attempt to kill off the "third pillar" of that marketing malarkey - the third party service provider - will result in more companies getting bitten by this single-source cloud failure garbage.
It isn't even that sophisticated. The whole idea of the cloud is that you don't need to know about the underlying IT, which is simply untrue as DiData are pointing out. You have to know your applications and your infrastructure if you want it to function in a particular way.
That leaves the cloud useful for non-critical things but not the basis for your business. The bottom has fallen out of the IT industry because we've completed the computerisation/networking of business. There's little raw kit/software left to sell. Cloud is basically outsourcing and cloud companies are desperate for recurring revenue now no-one is placing big orders for new kit. Surprisingly for some, you can't do outsourcing without knowing what's going on with the infrastructure. There is no "inevitability" about outsourcing, despite what Turnbull says. Cloud is not "magic." The engineering is hard, which is why a simpler in-house solution may actually be more robust.
Personally I'm surprised that ISP's haven't stepped in to offer an in between solution. Put in a couple of good load-balancers and share them between customers. That would seem like a good idea to me - share the expensive bits but keep the server-side engineering simple.
Any time you want to host a service, you'll run in security problems, especially if running cheap kit.
However, IPv6 does allow at least the possibility that you can set up a sensible firewall ruleset, partition your network for DMZs etc., on a residential system.
It doesn't solve the problem of poor security on a the end device of course. That's why we use VPNs.
I've noticed at least some progress already with wireless segregation being offered on lower-end devices.
Actually sugar is bad for you too. Apparently it messes with your body's ability to determine that you've eaten enough.
Those hip replacements talked about in the article - weakened bones break more easily to the point where the bone breaks causing the fall, not the fall breaking the bones. Bones of course are hard because of their calcium which can be leached by the body to counteract excessive acid in the digestive system caused (usually) by rich/acidic food, coffee, cream, cheese etc.
Health is a package, a lifestyle. Its best to not eat processed/concentrated food. The first things added in excess to packaged food tend to be salt, fat and sugar, all of which tend to be present in rather high quantities. If one is low, the others tend to go higher to compensate. The problem is the palette - we don't like eating simple but healthy food. Reduce the processing, reduce the human interference between pasture and plate, eat mostly plants, do some exercise and as a generalisation, you'll be much healthier. You'll still die of course, but you'll tend to be less sick along the way.
I think its a fairly sick mentality that suggests that getting people to die young before they become a financial burden on society is a good thing. We should be working for the good of the individual, not leaving them to die quickly by malnutrition, regardless of their income level.
Perhaps obesity on its own is too narrow a definition of what incurs health-costs, would it better please the ranters to widen it to "malnutrition"? It's still mostly the same thing but it might let the air out of their concern regarding sound-bite reports and politics.