I'm still on spinning rust, FFS!
Me too with my ~3 month old laptop. Unfortunately for my work I need ~500GB of data sets on it and just can't afford/justify the resulting SSD price tag.
5665 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Mar 2007
Hi bot,
Yes its a new ultra-secret project codenamed FUCKITOL to improve the NSA's compliance with the US legal system and constitution.
Yours, Edward.
p.s. Please delete all references to this as you are not written in Ada so are not approved for that level of classification.
But the point is still valid - if they collected evidence of a crime and it is accessible to Amazon, they should hand it over. The iPhone case was very different, it was not accessible to Apple and they were being asked to assist in breaking the device's security which has much wider implications as it changes what other's get.
Sure, this might become a snooper's gold mine, but following the court case people should know the truth. If Amazon are recording all of this and storing it and that creeps you out - don't get one. Sadly this is likely the reason for the fight - money, not rights.
You are right that HP probably were the cause of the primary failure.
However, the disastrous consequences of such an array failure lies squarely with the management and IT teams for not having a working DR system in place (that includes making sure *all* data is backed up, and that the backups are tested regularly). Even if HP didn't fsck-up, failures can and *do* happen all by themselves.
But the blame shone on the IT team is worrying, but maybe to be expected from this sort of commissioned report. I'm sure all of us have made mistakes, and all of us have jerry-rigged systems to get by, but not having proper DR in place for an organisation-wide storage system is a likely a management failure in terms of not funding and/or not asking the right questions (or being prepared to hear the true answers).
Most countries have legal intercept laws but that is not the problem. What is the issue here is the massive scale, lack of legal oversight in what is gathered, and gagging orders about even the fact of such an order being served.
Look to other countries as well that have less oppressive laws, say Sweden, Iceland, etc.
No, but you can greatly change how such requests are handled and the degree of cooperation offered.
All things considered, would the member's of LINX not be better served if the legal entity became, say, a German listed company with all officers located overseas? Sure it would still be bound in terms of UK operations, but they could hardly censor the directors operating overseas, nor fail to provide them with the details and at the same time serve a company with the necessary order.
Have you tried the same for Windows?
If you are a start-up company how many Linux users will actually have your hardware and need a kernel driver module?
Most specialist hardware companies I know of ship a compilable module for any drivers - that can be part object code if you have IPR to protect, and then end users compile on demand. Yes, its a pain in some cases but you can automate that.
"to appease the non-windows lot"
Let us not forget that the "Widnows lot" had to put up with some pretty shitty stuff as well, restrictions on what version of Windows/java/flash versions etc.
But your underlying point is valid - fix the $DIETY damn management tools and make the work smoothly on multiple platforms.
There are interesting aspects to LINX's reply:
"nothing in the proposals bans directors from asking members anything"
It says nothing about then answering such questions.
"we recommend creating a special new ability for elected directors to veto a decision by a majority of the Board"
Surely the majority of the board would act legally? What situation do the foresee that would need such an action at all? Since when did any other company have such a special rule for the board of directors that applies rules beyond the normal statuary duty that comes with being on a board of directors?
Sorry LINX, but those answers do nothing to make me think this has anything other than the Snooper's Charter behind it.
Then the importer carries the burden. And its up to them to have sufficient due-diligence from the folk in China to get off for a genuine mistake, otherwise its massive fines and/or chokey time.
It wont stop every crap device, but if it makes it very hard for Joe Public to buy a shitty insecure camera or video recorder, etc, because none of the shops or sellers like Amazon (who of course would be the importer in this case) then its done its job.
Why not modify web browsers to reduce and randomise the time-measuring functions available to any script?
I mean, when does a web page really need microsecond resolution? If the timing is jittered by a millisecond or so by some pseudo-ransom process would it really break stuff that is talking to the web server via a TCP/IP link with delays typically of the order of 10s of milliseconds?
"Every fecking time someone comes up with these fictional anecdotes"
Who said anything about getting an IT job? Did you actually read the comments?
Many folk, myself included, have found that most users can adapt, look at how the majority of the formally-windows-only users have now got smartphones and no issues with using them. That is the point, if you set up a Linux PC for someone like a grandparent and spend just 5 minutes to show them the key stuff (e.g. web browser, email client) that is enough in most cases. You get almost no examples of them breaking it because 99.9+% of malware won't run on such a desktop and they don't get put off by endless, pointless, indecipherable warnings from AV, etc.
They won't set up a Linux PC, and if they buy a Windows PC it won't come setup in any sane way (from their perspective) either so in a short time will cause you grief (if you care enough to help them that is).
"but every time I boot a Linux box I become convinced that the UX team hates me"
Really the same applies to most software now :( MS buggered about the the UX in the great 8.1 failure, Macs have been getting dumber, Google (and Mozilla who seem to slavishly follow them) seem hell-bent on removing anything possibly useful in a web browser. The list goes on and on...
I was talking about using the machines, not system design/config/management.
Irrespective of the OS, you still need professionals in a given area to do that properly.
I have been using Linux for many years and never (since mid-2000s) had to bother much with configuring X or networks - all pretty much works out of the box. As for LDAP, no idea, but then I would not attempt to set up Active Directory or roll-our a big platform of machines (any OS) similar without going on a relevant training course.
Calendars, task tracking, contacts...
That is NOT email (except for email contacts, of course). The fact that MS decided to lump it in with their own email client still does not make it email.
You do need Windows really for this though, I'm on a Mac right now and not of the above work that well compared to Windows.
Translation - MS can't (or won't) make their own fscking suite of programs work properly on other platforms they claim to support.
If you are tied to MS office in such depth then tough, you have no choice but to pay MS and accept any T&C they choose to apply to you. That is not the fault of the underlying OS, that is the fault of MS (and to some degree, yourself for buying in to) for such lock-in.
"Given that most people are familiar with Windows Android"
Fixed it for you...
Really, this "training for users" cost w.r.t OS choice is a bit bogus, either you have staff that are technically adept (e.g. software/engineering sort of group) in which case they can do most themselves, or you have non-computer geeks (i.e. most others) in which case you have to train for anything that changes. So a new version of Windows has played "lets move the control panel" one more: more training. You cloud supplier (MS, Google, whatever) has played the same "lets bugger up the web version" and training again. Irrespective of the underlying OS.
Is a very good point.
The real answer, of course, is secure/TPM boot is good when you have the ultimate control over its use, and not what the OEM has decided you should get. However, I don't know what this Samsung laptop is like to actually answer that. My old Acer Chromebook allowed you to disable it so I could boot Ubuntu, etc, if I wanted.
Reading the review my main complaint is the lack of built-in connectors for HDMI and older USB. Who really wants to have to carry a bag of dongles where ever you go that you might need to plug in to anything?
I have a el-chepo Chromebook and it was good for certain things, provided Google's whoring of your information is acceptable. For a "technically challenged" friend it was almost perfect (until they stood on it - not really and OS fault).
However my main gripe with that Chromebook was the keyboard. Yes, I like getting rid of caps lock, but they also got rid of the cursor keys and home/end and for many, many tasks that just royally pissed me off.
why not just run Ubuntu and put Windows in the virtual machine?
Is exactly what I do and it works very well.
But then I don't have a corporate sysadmin insisting that my desktop has to be a standard Windows image for their ease of management organisation wide, so for those in that situation I can see it kind of makes sense. But then you have to have Win10, so maybe you would ask for an Ubuntu VM on your Windows 7 corporate machine?
Same here, have visited the USA a few times and almost without exception the people I met and dealt with were nice and civilised.
However, that was some years ago and the public image and view being projected by the nation of America is such that I would not choose to go there. Of course, not everyone has a choice as business might take you there, but if you want an English-speaking holiday then you can got to Canada (or UK or event Holland!) and be free of Trumph and the gun-totting idiots that tend to support him.
OK, the UK also has right-wing xenophobic idiots as well, but at least they are not able to get the guns so easily...
It is not naive, in fact it is a very fundamental aspect the most radio courses gloss over!
Basically you have two antenna aspects: (1) "directivity gain" which is a measure of how much a beam is focused (there is no amplification), and (2) "effective aperture" which is a measure of the antenna's ability to intercept the EM flux.
As frequencies go up (generally speaking here, YMMV, etc) you get more easy focusing from a given reflector, etc, so directivity gain increases, but your effective aperture remains the same. To make calculations easier a radio link's "path loss" has a wavelength term, it is more than just inverse-square law spreading with distance, so that at constant flux and constant aperture you get the same signal even though the directivity gain increases with frequency.
So for two antenna pointing at each other, increasing the frequency would lead to a stronger signal due to the higher directivity gain, but at the expense of needing more accurate pointing. Conversely, if you keep the RF flux constant (so you get the same coverage area, same pointing error accuracy demands, etc) then increasing frequency has the opposite effect in that smaller reflectors, etc, are used to keep the directivity down, and so less aperture able to intercept the flux.
Rain attenuation is very high at those frequencies, but also it is not something that is well characterised (yet) as no one really has measured it for long enough to validate the model's upper range.
http://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/p/R-REC-P.838-3-200503-I!!PDF-E.pdf
You will notice the ITU-R models have no accuracy/error bounds on them...
"Well, there are still several drawbacks on Linux"
There are several (at least) drawbacks on Windows. The point is you pay your money (or not) and take your choice. If playing games in more important than privacy and security that is your choice to make. You are not me, your goals and priorities are not mine, so it is up to you to evaluate what matters most to you and to act accordingly.