Re: Look very hard!
Also remember those Voyagers are using valve amplifiers.
Yes, OK I am talking TWT here for the final RF amplification and not a pail of KT88s in ultra-linear configuration.
5659 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Mar 2007
Behind that is the possible case that /tmp is a ramdrive and small, while /var/tmp is expected to be on non-volatile storage and much larger. In the ramdrive case a reboot will inevitably wipe the directory even if the OS has no explicit step to do so.
Debian based systems like Ubuntu wipe /tmp on reboot only, where as RedHat based systems typically deleted from /tmp by cron job based on the last access time being a week or two ago.
The dB is a relative measure, specifically of power = 10 log10(P1/P2) but if you define P2 to be something fixed then it is an absolute measure. dBW has P2 = 1W, dBm has P2 = 1mW, etc, so:
0dBW = +30dBm = 1.0W = 1000mW
-10dBW = +20dBm = 1.0e-1 W = 100mW
-20dBW = +10dBm = 1.0e-2 W = 10mW
-30dBW = 0dBm = 1.0e-3 W = 1mW
-40dBW = -10dBm = 1.0e-4 W = 0.1mW
etc...
Some Linux distros are signed and can be used with secure boot enabled, but I think there can be issues with some propitiatory video drivers, etc, that break the trust-chain in such cases. In any case "secure boot" is only good at stopping some cases of root kits, and would not stop anyone capable of using Microcsoft's keys, for example, or of exploiting the generally piss-poor state of UEFI (or BIOS) firmware security.
If you are worried about security in general then a good starting place is the guidance at NCSC which cover many OS, not just Windows as one might expect, and including Ubuntu Linux:
https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/eud-security-guidance-ubuntu-1604-lts
My point is, these issues are terrible and all that, but how widespread are they really? How many people are actually affected by all these issues?
The bigger point, as others have mentioned, is this is happening with mass-market stuff like Intel sound and HP laptops. And it is symptomatic of a culture of poor (or non-existent) QA and attitude to its customers. They are not short of cash to do it properly, they choose to avoid doing it, it seems.
Now we all love a flame-war on Windows versus Linux but this recent spat of problems is due to a change in MS culture. 5-10 years ago we moaned abut the never ending vulnerabilities in IE, etc, needing patched and on the other hand how Linux struggled to get many items hardware to run, but very rarely did MS bork a mass number of machines.
Can you properly stop auto-play videos from EVER starting with out an explicit user action?
You know the shitty sort of thing now embedded in HTML5 pages to push adverts or just pointless additions to news pages (which is annoying waste of bandwidth if you don't have sound on the machine or are not in a position to use it).
That would make it superior to Firefox that seems to be doing its best to piss of users by breaking useful add-ons, and dumbing things down to look like chrome.
Almost. Saudi Arabia is ruled by the (extended) royal family but mostly they assume power by virtue of religion, given they have Mecca and so much that is valued by Muslims. Not that it means much in terms of protection of historical value:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_of_early_Islamic_heritage_sites_in_Saudi_Arabia
(Just to add that I have little religious interest, but see the destruction or re-writing of history as an unforgivable crime against our descendants)
First, let's include commercial spying, aka data harvesting, in the mix. What "right to privacy" applies to NSA and GCHQ that does not apply to Facebook and Google?
It should apply to both, but equally FB/Google don't have the powers to alter your life like gov agencies do.
Next there is the POPD - Plain Old Physical Domain. What "right to privacy" does online trawling breach, that a telescope on a pier above a crowded beach does not?
That is pretty much targeted - one beach, and a given time-window when you might expect something is going to happen. The police, etc, have been doing that sort of thing for decades and most folk see it as a perfectly reasonable balance between privacy and crime prevention.
Bulk surveillance is recording every beach, all the time, and then being able to do a search at some point for where you have been. See the difference?
I really doubt it. If you look at the stats for under-age pregnancy in the UK, which one might think would be correlated to badly planned sexual behaviour, it has dropped slightly in the last 20 years while the availability of pr0n (and associated moral hand-wringing) has rocketed.
So bugger-all in the way of evidence-based policies here.
Would you trust the Intel random number generation instruction?
Would you trust there are not already undocumented op-codes, even hidden in plain sight such as said random value, that recover part or all of previously used AES instruction's keys in some obfuscated form?
Lets face it, your development lab should be pretty much fire-walled off (or even air-gapped) from the rest of the world anyway as you have no idea what will be on it. Not necessarily malicious, but while developing products and messing about there is a very high chance of dumb shit happening and you don't want that leaking (or even as simple as IP address conflicts).
Earth pins (in the socket) are just weird--anyone care to hypothesise (or explain) why they were invented?
No idea, but two thoughts are:
1) It was an after-thought added to an existing design when folk realised how much safer earthed systems are.
2) It prevented the mating of a non-earthed plug to force upgrading to match the infrastructure (where as a 3rd hole would not).
"Brit taxpayers had shovelled £1bn into the programme from which they would now be locked out due to rules we insisted on and which we then decided to become non-compliant with"
Fixed his statement for him...
It is sad and stupid, and the loss of privileged access to Galileo is also sad and stupid but entirely predictable.
Some of the English fizz is actually very good, and at a recent blind-compare Champaign versus sparkling wine tasting I was at they were pretty much on a par according to most of those present. As always, chose a wine based on two simple test results:
1) You like the taste.
2) You are prepared to pay the corresponding price.
Simplez!
Maybe if the gov mandated at least 5 years of security fixes after end-of-sale they might change their tunes on supported open software. Oh, and big GDPR-like fines if they don’t deliver just to encourage a bit of proper compliance.
Setting up your own VPN might look like a great solution but it is not as clear cut. For a start you probably end up renting a "machine" somewhere for always-on connectivity and a fixed IP address which will cost more and/or also have the question of who has physical access to it.
Then you have the privacy issue that if its your own machine you have no plausible deniablity, whereas a shared VPN provider has many customers with the same apparent IP address. Finally you have the other reason that many folk use a VPN - to avoid geoblocking etc, and if you want the same you might need to set up hosted machines in a few countries at some cost and, again, the issue of trust in those.
So while you are putting a lot of trust in your VPN supplier you might still be better with a third party providing you take a bit of effort to select one that suits your use-case and are willing to pay for it as somehow every service has to be paid for...in money or in privacy.