Quite nice.
I like the most read and most commented feature.
Hate the fixed width (only fills half my 1920 wide screen) and the new comment icons are just nasty.
1596 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Nov 2007
When BT got into bed with Phorm I was determined to drop BT Broadband ASAP. I tried and tried to get a MAC from BT, but they kept on coming up with excuses ("the system that generates the MACs is down", usually).
Then this bloke from our local cable company knocked on the door offering their new WiMax service. 2 phone lines, 'free' 01,02 and 03 calls 24/7 and 8MB broadband for £29 a month (and free installation). I was *so* pissed off with BT that I took a risk, signed up and dumped BT entirely.
Know what, its bloody brilliant. I actually get closer to 10MBps download (and 1MBps upload), no slowdown at peak times and no apparent traffic shaping. Two phone lines are really useful and the missus can rabbit 24/7 without running up a huge bill OR blocking incoming calls.
Considering I was previously getting peak speeds of around 4MBps with BT ADSL which slowed to around 250KBps at peak times, I'm *well* pleased.
The Highway Code lists that sign as "Frail Pedestrians likely to cross", not "Beware, militant old gits"
Its not about speed, it about alerting drivers to possible hazards (you'd never believe the damage a Zimmer frame can do)
I'm waiting for militant foxes and badgers to complain that the "Wild Animals" warning sign discriminates against them because it depicts a deer.
Whenever I have reported a case of bullying against my kids, I have always got the impression that the main reason the teachers won't do anything about it is down to their own fear of the alleged bully and/or their parents.
What's easier, fobbing of the mild mannered parents of the alleged victim or dealing with the, let us say, less than reasonable, parents of the alleged bully?
***"The customer retention ploy has been heavily promoted recently in BT's TV campaign "***
Yeees, I've notice BT stepping up their broadband ad campaign. I assume its to compensate for all those (like me) who have pissed off to other ISPs who *don't* spy on them and throttle their bandwidth.
@AC
***"Now Im happy to admit the Wii is a niche console..."***
Actually its probably the other way round. The other consoles are fighting over a 'niche' market (so called "serious" gamers), the Wii is aimed at a much wider audience, which explains *why* it outsells the other two put together. It isn't fighting for the same punters.
Though, when you play MP3, you wonder why all FPS games aren't made this way.
***"Only people with something to hide (i.e. as yet unidentified law-breakers) have something to fear from such a process.
So, put simply, stop breaking the law."***
What an inordinate *prick* you are!
And how can you be *so* sure *you* haven't broken any law? Ever? Where do you draw the line between law-abiding and non law abiding. Accidentally broke a speed limit by 5 mph 10 years ago? Are you still law abiding? Murdered someone 10 years ago? Still Law abiding? How many crimes, and to what degree, do you need to commit to step over that line?
I sincerely hope that you review your past activities and compare them to the current UK statutes and common Law (this may take the rest of your life, of course). If you think you may have transgressed any I assume you will take yourself down to the local cop-shop to confess all.
Why do the "Nothing to hide, nothing to fear" brigade always post as AC? Obviously they *do* have something to hide *or* something to fear.
Wake up and smell the coffee! The DNA database is *not* infallible. There can, and have been, false positives. Even though the data on the database should be of good quality, the DNA recovered from the crime scene may not be, and may match with several people on the *current* database, let alone a full national one.
There is also the possibility of your DNA being at a crime scene by accident, particularly if it was a public place, or even being planted deliberately. This becomes an even bigger problem if the real perpetrator of the crime takes (really quite simple) steps to ensure his DNA is not left behind (which he will be more likely to do if he knows he is on the DNA database). You will have the situation where there may be several DNA profiles at a crime scene, none of them belonging to the real criminal. All of those people will have to be "eliminated from enquiries". If the mindset of the investigating officers, CPS and Jury are of the typical "DNA is infallible" mindset, then one of those people could well end up being convicted of a crime merely because his DNA was present, he didn't have an alibi and the real criminal took steps *not* to leave his DNA behind.
Nothing to fear?
Nothing to see here, move right along folks, nothing to see.
So we know that the DVLA will sell our addresses to scumbag quasi-legal wheel clampers, the Police will sell your DNA profile to 3rd parties, the Gov't regularly loses our data and the security services are less than careful with memory sticks and laptops.
And we are expected to trust them with our biometric data for the National ID register too?
No, nothing to fear at all.
***"Redmond claimed to have sold 180 million Vista licenses to PC vendors and individuals so far."***
I have a Windows Vista Business licence for my shiny new Dell D830 laptop. There is a nice Vista licence sticker on the underside and a Windows Vista sticker on the keyboard (right next to the Core 2 Duo sticker) and, no doubt, MS claim this as one of those 180 million licences sold.
The computer is actually running XP Pro as a 'downgrade', however.....
to do a deal with a know spyware pusher and sell him all of your customer's data.
Problem is, unlike 10 years ago, 90% of the online population of the UK are now clueless numpties who will suck hard and swallow when BT tells them Phorm is good for them.
***"Mind you, as FACT is convinced that all piracy is funding terrorism they might just decide to lock up anyone that uses the internet for 42 days and be done with it..."***
Yes, they do rather bang on about this, don't they.
Rather perverse, then, that it is perfectly *legal* to *buy* a dodgy DVD from one of these terrorist / drug pushing "organised criminals" (FACT's own website even states this:
http://www.fact-uk.org.uk/site/about/faq.htm#20) but *illegal* to copy your own DVDs for your own use.
Thank you for your kind and polite letter.
My extensive network of contacts in MI5, the CIA and Mossad have discovered your location and identity.
Unfortunately, all of my professional operatives are busy on other assignments at the moment, but my desire to expedite this transaction has forced me to use a resource that I normally reserve for making (rather messy) examples of people who offend me.
The good news (for you) is that he won't kill you (some kind of religious conviction), and I believe you can lead a fairly reasonable life without a penis.
If you wish I can ask him to remove your hands as well. That way you won't miss the loss of your genitals quite so much.
Hoping you are well (at the moment)
EC
HP's inkjet cartridges suffer some serious packaging overload. A matchbox sized cartridge in a foil pack, in a plastic tray, in a box along with an instruction booklet in about 50 languages (of which the English instructions take up single page) and advertising crap, in a cardboard box inside a cellophane wrapper.
A policeman friend of mine was asked to look into the complaints raised by parents about the driving around a local school at kicking-out time. He and a couple of colleagues turned up and dished out tickets to anyone causing an obstruction and/or driving in an inconsiderate or (in one case) dangerous way.
All but *one* of the original complainers got tickets, including the one for dangerous driving.
So be careful what you wish for.
The problem with other speed cameras (Gatso, Truvelo, etc) is that they measure the instantaneous speed of a vehicle, their locations are well known and they are highly visible. The upshot of this is that the only people these cameras catch are the unwary. Speed twunts, like Clarkson, merely slow down for them, then speed up again and, they make bloody sure their GPS has its camera database up to date and their laser/radar detector is in good working order.
In other words, *traditional* speed cameras do nothing to deter aggressive driving and may even encourage it for those who think the best way to give a speed camera 'the finger' (as if the camera actually cares) is to creep past it at 5mph below the limit and then floor it once past.
Now, along comes a speed camera system (SPECS) that cannot be avoided. You *have* to drive at an average speed <= the limit. Clarkson's reaction? Toys get lobbed out of his gas guzzling baby buggy.
***"This is expected to start in 2010 at £185 per liable parking space and then rise over time to £350. The council believes that by penalising individuals who park in the city, they will encourage greater uptake of public transport."****
Funny how every 'green' initiative thought up by local and national government is invariably a stick that will cost the motorist money. Never is there a carrot to counterbalance it.
I note that the BBC article states that the money raised "would be invested back into funding more and better public transport in Nottingham". Notice it doesn't say "cheaper public transport".
The cynical amongst us might start to believe that these 'green' initiatives are merely an excuse to raise cash.
Its not the ads that are the problem, its the way you are 'profiled' in order to determine which ads to show you.
It amounts to spying.
eBay spy on you when you are on eBay. This is not so very different to the way Tesco spy on you when you use a 'club card'. Fairly seedy, but legal and above board.
Phorm spy on you wherever you go on the 'web'. Any web site, any time. Its like Tesco seeing what you are buying, not only in Tesco, but in Sainsbury, Somerfield, Co-Op, Morrisons, PC World, Boots and (if you are Garry Owen) as you are buying your Big-Boy vacuum pump from your local sex shop. Extremely seedy, probably illegal, and anything *but* above board.
Paris, 'cos she doesn't mind showing off her private bits, either.
You *know* what eBay are doing. By your analogy you would also *know* what the hotel do. If you stay in a hotel that you *know* spies on your bedroom activities then you can't complain about it, can you.
If eBay introduced this without making it public then your analogy would hold some credibility, as it is, its just a pointless rant.
What eBay are doing is pretty nasty, but Phorm is several orders of magnitude worse. Using your analogy Phorm is like someone spying on your wank-fest irrespective of what hotel you are in and without that hotel's knowledge.
@AC ***"ISPs have the right to modify traffic on their own network as much as ebay have to modify adverts on their sites."***
No, they *absolutely* do *not* have that right. Tampering with private communications is *illegal*.
There is a *very* big differences between what eBay is doing and what Phorm are trying to do. If you don't like what eBay are doing, don't use eBay. If you don't like what Phorm are up to, you have to change your ISP. Big difference.
eBay spy on what you are doing on eBay. Phorm spy on everything you do and every site you visit. Big difference.
What eBay are doing is legal. What Phorm want to do is illegal. Big difference.
eBay will only have data about activity on their own website. Phorm will be able to spy on other eCommerce sites. Big difference.
***"Or are you one of the "Black is white and white is black" brigade who can not under any circumstances admit that .. gosh darn it.. you might be wrong??"***
Gosh, why is winding up fanbois so much *fun*. I know I shouldn't do it, but I just can't help myself. Very sorry, and all that.
Off to get some professional help, now.
I see.
One of the biggest obstacles the Gov't has with ID cards is the resistance from older people who remember a time when Big Brother was just a character in a story.
Solution?
Create a web site aimed specifically at yoofs in order to indoctrinate them without interference from busy-body old fossils.
Nice black helicopter, for obvious reasons.
***"To add a final twist - and a much-needed IT angle"****
I heard this story on the Today programme. As soon as they mentioned the tenuous IT angle I thought "that'll be in The Register, then".
And where is the Playmobile reconstruction. Couldn't find any bunnies in the Playmobile toybox, or something?
Well, it would be a straw man argument if it wasn't for the fact that I didn't realise he was quoting (bad eyesight). It's why I emphasise quotes to avoid confusion.
***"Quoted stuff"***
Apologies to Michael for not getting his point.
Paris, 'cos I'm feeling a bit blond at the moment......
***"I use bittorrent to get stuff that is not avaible in the uk eg us series that sre not out here old tv series not out on dvd anymore animi and last but not least porn do you think they sell that on itunes?"***
Err, michael,
It might interest you to know that downloading US tv shows, and porn (well, that which isn't home made) is just as much a copyright infringement as downloading the latest Amy Winehouse album.