Re: Next time, include a refueling port.
3. It's probably similar cost to launch a new better telescope than refuel an old one so far away.
4. It's got broken reaction wheels. More failures are possible.
I hope the James Webb will be a success.
9273 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Nov 2007
But we can't pick up regular broadcasts and a beamed transmission is likely to be in the noise at about 10 ly distance only, i.e. a mere handful of likely stars.
Also WHY would anyone beam a transmission? The range of regular broadcasting would hardly reach the Oort Cloud, even if someone parked there with massive dishes.
It's basic thermodynamics, the issue of signal to noise and the inverse square law. We can pick up radio noise emitted by stars on big dishes as that is massive!
Basic Thermodynamics resulting in Shannon-Nyquist law.
Radio, other than star emissions, can't possibly be practical for a more than a few light years distance, tens at most if beamed.
Our emissions at the peak (lower now) hardly likely to be detectable much beyond Kuiper Belt and unlikely as far as the Oort cloud.
~
There is no Fermi paradox, only a lack of understanding of practical RF engineering. The only likely method of detecting a civilisation is using the power of a star as "transmitter", the spectrum seen as a planet with an atmosphere transits in the same plane as our observations. The James Web 'scope should improve our ability to do this.
Also allegedly a reason for female radio operators in WWII, though it might have been anxious staff procurement wanting to avoid having female appointments blocked.
However I don't think it's a frequency response issue, but the idea that fainter female voice with more background noise is easier to understand. So I suspect that the software is poor rather than anything inherent about female voices, which can be clearer (certain parts of Brooklyn, Dublin, Yorkshire and West Country may be exceptions).
I expect they have poor choice of samples, despite claims that it's some other problem.
The only difference I see from 25 years ago is that it seems to skip the personalised user training and give about the same performance, poor. The phone menus with voice recognition are ghastly compared to numbered menus, which are ghastly. None of it is to make a better customer experience but to save money.
Same with evil automated checkouts, which encourage some people to cheat. No doubt the thefts are less than cost of a checkout operator. I don't expect transparent & honest figures for how accurate Amazon's invisible checkout is. Next step is to ban customers from aisles and have Argos style terminal (identical to online website / phone app) and you queue to wait for shopping basket to appear. Pay by paypal, IBAN, plastic or RFID phone.
Like maybe AI is PR, everything is hyped. Deep Learning & Neural networks are also totally misleading terms.
It's software. How often does a program not have crap bits and no-one can figure why?
Sometimes like clippy, ribbon or Metro/ModernUI we do know why but whoever is in charge isn't listening.
I was on a flight from Austria to UK. A large school trip of returning teen school girls. At one stage the Captain came on intercom and suggested if they were not quieter he'd get permission for the cabin crew to put them off.
It was dreadful.
However a bus load of teen boys to & from a rugger match is worse.
Adverts (if static & silent) don't bother me if locally hosted. The issue is 3rd party scripts rather even than a 3rd party image source + web link. It's just too high risk. CNN and BBC.com have both served malware via ads using 3rd party scripts.
It's now impossible to use YouTube on my Firefox. Google want my agreement to a multpage abusive T&C before allowing access, Funny it still works on Google's Chrome with no clicking on any agreement. Google also doing this on Android TV. You have to agree their T&C before tuning the TV set at all.
I think Google are breaking EU law. As are sites that insist I have to allow 3rd party scripts for access. A security issue rather than an attempt to block ads.
Web is getting crazy.
see scripts on all the major newspapers and http://uk.businessinsider.com/
Widespread use of Google services (fonts for main site, scripts for main site, analytics, advert scripts) by many websites is just evil. I can't believe it's legal and is breaking intent of EU cookie law. As does almost every site asking for consent. Third party cookies, clear pixels, sharing buttons/logos with 3rd party script (not just a link) and all other 3rd party tracking should be illegal. I'm not sure they are legal in EU.
Occasionally in the last few years I did get the odd bargain for stuff that wasn't junk.
Also true in PC World.
Once even in Hardly Normal's, a nice Toshiba HDTV because it was older stock (no ethernet, loads of video in options and fatter with CCFL backlight giving a more even and better white than cheaper LED TVS, some of which have edge based LEDs.
Except it's STREAMING. Broadcast is quite a different thing, only using identical data for everyone and rather rare outside a LAN. WiFi has to do it by duplicating the UDP stream for each client unless some newer version has added a true broadcast mode. Also with Broadcast there is only linear scheduling and everyone has same data at the same time (+/- distribution latency).
LTE's broadcast mode is really a customised DTT so as to sell Scheduled Broadcast PayTV if Ofcom manages to sell off all terrestrial TV spectrum. Qualcomm did a Broadcast trial for Mobile in UK. Nokia long ago had a handset with DVB-h and there were some handsets in Germany with DVB-t, but neither mobile operators, regulators or phone makers can get revenue from DVB-T in a phone.
This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mergers_and_acquisitions_by_Amazon
See also
List of mergers and acquisitions by Apple
List of mergers and acquisitions by Facebook
List of mergers and acquisitions by Google
List of mergers and acquisitions by Twitter
List of mergers and acquisitions by Microsoft
Also Disney!
Consumers exist to be exploited
Foreign companies exist to be offshored to, and be sued if they try to enter US Retail
It didn't. They changed the % limits for Mainland Europe, GB, NI and Ireland. It's mostly 240V in UK, 220V in Germany and 230V in Ireland, like it always was. Equipment marked CE has to work in any EU electrical supply, though it MUST have the local standard of plug, if it plugs in.
The most criminal is Amazon supplying 5V chargers with a CE mark. Yet they only have the USA two blades, illegal in all of Europe to retail. The actual electronics like most SMPSU do seem to work 90V to 245V.
Older 220V gear with a transformer and no taps (Such as German Market radios) may need a dropper resistor in the UK.
Once upon a time the AC voltage could easily be stepped up or down nearly lossless (if it's a really big transformer). The only way to do it with DC was a dynamotor (rotary converter), basically a motor and dynamo on the same shaft. Very lossy.
Why?
Because high voltage means lower current and thus the wires can carry maybe 1000x more power on a grid. Power distribution is 5,000 V to 400,000V depending on the length of cable and power to be carried. USA houses have to have 220V for wired in high power appliances (Allows about 3 kW) as the 110V wiring might only allow 1 kW to 1.5 kW, I'm not sure. Much less than Europe.
However the transmission wiring has capacitance and inductance. In theory perfect capacitors are lossless. Also very long wires act as an aerial even at 50Hz or 60Hz so some energy is radiated. DC thus is lower loss. Today the efficiency of electronics based DC-DC converters is very high (I suspect very big SMPSU). The high voltage DC is a big advantage on an undersea or underground cable and increasingly being used for grid distribution.
Japan has 50Hz and 60Hz, but is 110V.
TV was originally based on the local mains for the field rate so hum bars would be stationary, it's a pity it wasn't 48Hz (2x film), the 1/2 field frame rate of 25 fps or 30fps is a clever early x2 compression scheme. We are much less able to see detail in movement, so the idea was to transmit odd and even lines in alternate frames. Thus static pictures were about 480 visible (of 525) in USA, or about 378 of 405 lines or from 1948 in Europe/Russia about 576 lines out of 625 transmitted. The extra lines are time to allow the scanning electronics in camera and screen to reset to the top of the frame. The 1080 lines HD is actually from 1125 lines Japanese Analogue HD.
The lock to local mains wasn't needed from mid 1950s. It's totally sad that the entry level of HD wasn't 48 fps without interlace. The analogue interlace technique makes it HARDER to do digital! Possibly also more than 1080 lines and no 720 mode as that's not much improvement in Europe (rather than 480 USA/Japan). Having 1200 minimum (twice SVGA) would have been better. Digital and HD resolutions and frame rates are a mess, 24p, 25i, 30i, 50p, 48p 60p frame rates, both square and anamorphic pixels. The HD Ready lie, TVs with no HD Tuner and only rescaling 1920 x 1080 to native pixels.
Irish reception of the UK or German Radio time signal is very erratic in the Mid-West and West. One Alarm clock here has no manual setting and can take 1 to 10 days to recover the time. Idiot design.
A wrist watch uses your body heat to make the crystal more stable. A quartz crystal wall / desk / alarm clock is a victim of the local temperature. Much less accurate than worn decent metal back quartz watch and very much less accurate than synchronous motor or mains counting electronic clock.
Old clocks. I still have a lovely 1950s mantel clock.
Most mechanical plug-in time-switches.
A lot of central heating and immersion clocks are still mechanical as that stuff lasts for ever unlike the privacy parasite IoT stuff.
Very many NEW cheap clock radios and LED alarm clocks actually count the 50Hz. It's built into the ancient design LED clock/display single chips they still use. Some older ones have a PP3 with an RC oscillator. These seem to last forever.
They SHOULD have set 100% coverage and minimum speeds for 3G. They legally could.
They SHOULD have set 100% coverage and minimum speeds for 4G. They legally could.
Why didn't they? Because they are not much interested in real regulation, spectrum efficiency, spectrum protection or the Consumer. Despite the reasons behind the creation of "Independent" regulators the main goal is same as 19th C & 20th C. Government control, esp. raising of revenue and also a level playing field between rich competitors as they don't want to fight court cases.
Neither Ofcom or Comreg properly actually measure indoor & outdoor coverage and speeds. Mostly they rely on the Operators own reporting! So coverage and speeds, especially at busy times are far worse than official figures.
I was annoyed when MS killed older Skype, they did it MUCH later on Linux. The replacement is inferior. So I and many others now use Viber (we tried QQ for a while on Windows & Android, but only Chinese on Linux).
~
Only Viber issue is that SOME laptops are assumed to be retina/HiDPI by Viber/QT/Flatback. It's not simply being 1920 x 1080, something knows physical screen size and making a stupid decision. Solution is install, if OK do nothing, if not put QT_SCALE_FACTOR=0.5 in the startup environment: sudo nano /etc/environment works on my Linux Mint 18.3. Another laptop with same 1920 x 1080 also made by Lenovo but larger screen was fine. Both same identical desktop & Linux Mint. This seems to occur with some other Flatpack apps on Ubuntu, but Mint only got Flatpack with 18.3.
It sounds like a classic "Oh Linux is too hard" but really this was simpler than any of the half dozen major issues I've had with Win 10 or with Skype since MS decided it was a Phone App with adverts.
They did for Netbooks, with varying degrees of success. I have one that now has CF card adaptor instead of the too small Flash PCB and a big CF card. Running Linux Mint 18.3 Mate fine.
MS paid the makers to put on XP, which eventually along with price & Spec increases and better tablets killed the niche.
I have two other Netbooks of various vintage now updated (not re-installed) from XP to 17.1, to 17.3 and then last week to 18.1 and after to Linux Mint 18.3 Mate.
All using mad broadcom WiFi drivers (which admittedly had to be manually added to 17.1 clean install over XP and fine since.
OTH recent Win 10 upgrade of Win10 couldn't install the sound card drivers properly! Uninstal in Device Manager and then "search" Windows.old for drivers succeeded perfectly, whereas search on Windows update or automatically didn't fix it.
He's the third organisation with the idea. Work started already.
The problem is that while it solves the latency issue of Ka-Sat (with its 82 spots approx), it doesn't give very good capacity.
Good coverage doesn't mean good speed.
I'd use a coil in series with electronics to develop a magnetic field, that operated plunger to change setting of clock type balance wheel escapement. The spring loaded centre off/on switch would lock the escapement via balance wheel or give the coil driven plunger a kick to start wheel.
I've made custom series current coils to do this. A prototype would use the coil in a quartz clock that takes as low as 0.9V pulse to kick the cogs once a second. That coil has a metal plunger that interacts with a circular permanent magnet on a cog.
Why did competitors use a rechargeable cell? Because it's much cheaper than a spring drive, doesn't rust and NiCd or NiMH can last five years (cycles only). LiPoly not so long life, esp at extreme temperatures (cycles and time since manufacture).
I've worked with creating patents (I have one) and finding legal, moral solutions to circumvent. It's difficult & expensive and since 19th C the patent is useless unless owned by a big company. A UK Chemist in New York (1890s) copied Swedish (?) Wilhelm Hellesen's battery and sold the US patent to The American Novelty Co. that was later National Carbon/Union Carbide/US Eveready and is now Energiser.
US government eventually invalidated Edison's Movie patents (which were invalid when fiiled!).
It's glamorous to be an inventor, but really since 19th C it's a mechanism for big rich companies. The USPTO works on the principle that if the Patent is "really" invalid, it's up to a rich competitor to prove it in US Courts. They make little money from rejecting them and don't make much effort to spot if prior art, obvious to someone schooled in the art or too broad. Many patent applications that seem novel or have no prior art do fail or should fail on the "obvious" aspect.
Design Patents (=UK Registered Design), Trademarks and Copyright are all different things. You need money. "Winter is Coming".
More likely to get rich being a Patent Lawyer than "inventing", in sense of patenting. Indeed I've never made a cent from my brilliant patent.
Sony had a 1960s transistor tape recorder with spring drive. A German company in early 1950s had a spring drive valve tape recorder. Though both used batteries for electronics.
German portable valve radios had NiCd rechargeable cells for LT before WWII. Before 1938 most portable sets had a lead acid battery (plastic and gel types existed from early 1930s).
A patent, copyright or registered design can't and shouldn't prevent achieving the same aim by different means. Actually US companies since Edison have used patents and lawyers to prevent valid competition, too broad patents, or ignored prior art or applied wrong by the court. Very many patents are not really valid and only used by rich companies to stop new entrants or have a cartel.
The idea of hand cranked electronics and rechargeable cells was over 50 years old in 1990s. The idea of storing energy in a spring was 100s of years old. Once a market was demonstrated for a cranked transistor radio, then even Apple couldn't have stopped alternate implementations.
You can't patent or copyright a basic concept / idea. It would kill innovation if you could.
Baylis was a wonderful entrepreneur and inventor. But for size & weight the idea of a cell and motor (cranked or pull cord) is better than a spring, which still needs a motor as the generator. My pull cord recharged LED torch with a solar panel is nice.
Amazon (since 1998) is DELIBERATELY not very profitable. Using income to create monopolies, market dominations, greater empire.
Other companies use shell companies with so called IP to look unprofitable (Starbucks).
Others are parasites (KFC & McD retailers provide the capital/premises, employ staff) such as Uber, AirBnB who are really just Internet version of Yellow/Golden pages and slurping all the customer and driver/renter data to also make money.
Note Amazon & eBay etc are really just internet versions of Mail Order and Google & Facebook are really just advert agencies. Many big name Global Tech companies are just USERS of Tech to exploit their markets. Other big US Tech companies are primarily marketing companies as they often buy in new tech by take-overs and outsource most manufacturing.
So shouldn't be automatic.
Taxing profits is now pointless with the creative bookkeeping or borg like takeovers to expand control (see Amazon 1998 to now).
This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.
~
So yes you need to identify specific companies. Apple has less than 14% of smartphone market, their main activity is smartphones. Yet one of largest companies by share value in the world. Paid less than 1% Corporation tax in Ireland (yet rate was 12.5% most of the time). Now moved EU tax HQ from Ireland to the UK Jersey Tax haven because EU has rumbled it and insisted 13 Billion underpaid.
In Ireland alone, paying nothing like % tax of local companies: Analog Devices, Qualcomm(?), IBM, PayPal, Microsoft, eBay, Facebook, Uber, Intel, Sky. Previously Apple & Eircom (Eir).
1080 might be fine for TV, Absolutely stupid for editing documents. The 1200 I had on my 2002 laptop is a minimum.
The so called "retina" screen laptops are madly expensive and most are a far too small screen for 16:9. The 16:9 or 16:10 (if you are lucky with 1920 x 1200) is not great either for a laptop / documents. Makes a tall enough screen too wide.
11" high paper shown at 120 dpi needs 1320 pixels high. At old 1.66:1 Cinema Widescreen that is 2192 pixel wide approx. That would be about a 17" screen but less wide than 16:9 laptop. 120dpi is a minimum resolution. Above 150 dpi you need more pixels or the screen & text gets too small.
I have big screens for video. I want to watch video without reading glasses.
You should never have been able. It should have needed a court order. It's not the same as a phone book or a Company office!
Also ALL commercial websites selling stuff or services ought to have clearly visible email/contact form, physical address, phone number. That is indeed IS the law (and ignored) in many countries, so no need for public WhoIs.
Also security was an add-on fudge. The original idea of direct use of MAC address to automagically create an IP6 was a total privacy fail. At least they fixed that.
Setting up a firewall so none of your LAN resources or addresses are exposed seems complicated. Maybe it isn't, but the goal of EVERYTHING having a public IP address, just because you can was plain wrong. A dream for big exploitive companies, governments and criminals.