Re: Suppressing ... earlier versions
six : Sow
four : Cow
two: Goat
9273 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Nov 2007
Fine for support and updates.
A total kick in the teeth if you just occasionally use something and don't need updates. The Subscription Adobe is MUCH more expensive.
Applying Pay TV model to Applications or OS other than Payroll or Accounts* is plain evil.
(*Someone expert has to put changes on tax etc).
It was progressing nicely and then Corel bought it. They made the UI very muddled and certainly many Corel versions were less productive, clunky and very few useful improvements over Paint Shop Pro 7
PSP7 has layers and each can be raster or vector. Many Photoshop plug-ins and pressure features of Wacom tablet work on PSP7. Earlier Corel versions won't run on Win7
Various theories and legends exist about the Stone's history prior to its placement in Scone:
One story concerns Fergus, son of Erc, the first King of the Scots in Scotland, whose transportation of the Stone from Ireland to Argyll, where he was crowned in it, was recorded.[2]
Some versions identify the stone brought by Fergus with the Lia Fáil used at Tara for the High King of Ireland. Other traditions contend the Lia Fáil remains at Tara.[3][4] (Inis Fáil, The Island of Destiny, is one of the traditional names of Ireland.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_of_Scone
Despite the claim on Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lia_F%C3%A1il
The Lia Fáil (Irish pronunciation: [ˌlʲiːə ˈfɔːlʲ], meaning Stone of Destiny), not to be confused with the Stone of Scone, is a stone at the Inauguration Mound (Irish: an Forrad) on the Hill of Tara in County Meath, Ireland, which served as the coronation stone for the High Kings of Ireland. It is also known as the Coronation Stone of Tara.[1] In legend, all of the kings of Ireland were crowned on the stone up to Muirchertach mac Ercae c. AD 500.
The oldest Irish written sources actually claim it was lent to the Scots and not returned. Obviously the one at Tara is for the Tourists and how could you sit on it anyway?. Irish legend claims also it was Jacob's Pillow AND brought by the Tuath Dé from their city when they invaded Ireland (it can't actually be both, the Jacob's Pillow is a typical later Christian insertion).
No, the video /audio is the same. But Sky charge all the FTA broadcasters extortionate money to be on the Sky EPG. Ofcom, strangely, seems to think that charging five or six figure sums annually for each channel is fine. It's very little bandwidth cost and the broadcaster provides the machine readable file for the automated EPG transmission carousel.
Then BBC has to separately pay to Sky for it's Interactive stuff as Sky use the proprietary "Open TV" which only works on Sky boxes and BBC uses the MHEG5 system (which is open and free for box maker and on PC applications as well as setboxes, but not actually open source). MHEG5 interactive also used in other countries, Satellite and Terrestrial.
"Moving to a subscription service would in theory force the BBC to produce high quality output,"
That works so well for Sky 1, less than 2% of viewing time, and how many programs do Sky actually make? (Sky Sports doesn't count).
Every historic evidence is that subscription would mean low quality, chase market share programming like "big brother", popular USA imports (a foreign culture at the end of the day). If you want only subscription TV, then you better scrap the idea of Public Service Broadcasting. The USA PSB channel is emasculated.
Netflix vs TV Licence: A very bad and false comparison. A video rental shop via broadband isn't a Pay TV operator. Also they are subsidised by your ISP if it actually works properly (they put servers at ISP). They also are unlike Sky aggressively pricing to build market share.
Sky (as it works outside cable areas) and has actual TV channels, is the only comparison.
Also not all the TV licence goes to BBC? Unless it's been changed. Isn't it really a tax on being able to watch ANY TV?
Some 20 per cent of people never view or listen to anything the BBC does.
a) If true, they need to reform.
b) Maybe these are also the people that before voting claimed they'd never vote Cons, or would vote labour.
c) Maybe they are counting it wrong.
d) Public service broadcasting needs to be Free To Air, even if many people are ignoring it.
Internet vs Broadcast
Broadcast reception is scaleable for free, works in a disaster and is private for listener / viewer. No privacy on Internet, scaling to more users expensive, fragile in disaster.
Terrestrial via Satellite / Cable.
Only terrestrial is portable and needs no user infrastucture.
If BBC scrapped DAB, a layer of managers, overpaid so called celebrities and concentrated on content?
As a PSB they'd be doing something wrong if only appealing to lowest common denominator too.
Google would say that.
"Google pointed out that those figures might be off, since a huge number of minor crashes aren't reported to the authorities. "
Our Cloud loving possibly future Overlord would say that.
The cars are 100% programmed by humans. When the many flaws in the software appear it may be mildly annoying or spectacularly fatal.
Markets are what are? Surely they can't be "right" or "wrong".
Then there is pricing by vendors. Too high and they lose sales. But sometimes too low and they lose sales. Sometimes they need to price higher than Competition (Apple).
So how do you even compare prices of similar products.
Right for who? Investors, Speculators, Consumers, Tax gatherers, resource producers, factory owners (who don't sell to public).
I think if I could figure it I should make money, maybe get a Nobel when I expose all in biography and not waste time writing here.
At least he admits he is anti EU.
Actually is sticking with Sterling good?
1) Gives opportunity for parasites to make money speculating
2) Increases cost to consumer of Euro imports as importers hedge on currency
3) Affects exports to Euro areas, due to currency hedging
Also leaving EU would hurt Ireland. Not being in Euro hurts Ireland as so much Irish Imports from Euro countries are via UK and currency hedged twice! Ireland can do nothing about Manufacturers that continue to regard Ireland as part of UK market and will only appoint UK distributors for Ireland.
The Anti EU sentiment in UK has some small amount of logic, but in dealing with China, Russia and USA is it better to be alone (62Million approx) or part of EU (500M), and Europe Centric (720M ?)
Sometimes it seems like UK is the least European part of Europe and thinks it's in the Middle of the Atlantic.
Anti EU sentiment in UK I think is mostly Xenophobia and also encouraged by USA who didn't mind Common Market but see a better, bigger EU as a threat to their own financial and cultural influence.
The EU needs to be reformed. The larger EU countries want to do this, UK needs to work as a partner and not throw toys out of pram or sulk on their own. Even some non-EU European countries are more committed and engaged with EU than UK.
Conservatives need to show leadership, ignore UKIP and Murdoch media.
It can't have been long, as I blinked and missed it.
Certainly for a while they were more significant. I can't see why T-Mobile is bothering. Especially as Mobile Operators would love to stop subsidizing handsets, as long as all their competitors stopped first.
produces some fairly noxious ewaste into the bargain.
Lithium Ion recycling, Oddly not Lead Acid, Most Lead Acid Batteries in Europe are easily recycled as new Lead Acid Batteries. The Lead can be essentially reused easily forever. Lithium batteries are far more energy intensive to recycle and don't last as long.
"then you can virtually cycle the thing in perpetuity"
No, you can't.
Lithium cells store best at about 66% charge.
They start degrading with time as soon as made even if not discharged. For off grid you need to store daylight energy for night time. So cycling is daily and perhaps 1/3rd discharge for new batteries and after a year or two that might be 50% of capacity as capacity reduces with use (and time for Lithium Ion).
I recently charged a New Old Stock 40 year old Lead Acid cell. It's fine because it was never filled with acid. Sadly today shops store Lead Acid batteries pre-filled, so check the date code!
There are really two main kinds of Lead Acid Gel cells. The UPS/ Alarm / Emergency light float applications and the regular cycling (portable lamps and inverters) were it's discharged daily.
They are more for standby or portable use at lower AH than 40AH
Gel types are poor at high pulse currents compared to wet,
There are several flavours of wet lead acid:
General Purpose
High pulse current (for starter motors). These don't like deep cycle. Typically 30AH to 200AH and 12V.
Industrial UPS standby. There may be a generator too. Much higher power than single PC / Server UPS.
Regular deep cycle (i.e. night time on off grid solar). Typically sold as 2V 200AH or larger capacity.
Only units subject to movement / vibration need fibreglass mat spacers.
They have different plate constructions. Life is shorter on all types if the battery is completely discharged. But this is perhaps more true of Lithium Ion. The NiMH in contrast can be stored discharged (better actually!) and don't have a problem with full discharge.
All types technology reduce in capacity with number of cycles, so for off grid night time use double the kWH capacity needed.
The tech makes sense for reduced weight. Such as cars, phones, laptops.
In terms of volume, not weight, the NiMH is close and can do more full cycles. My laptop is on it's 5th 14.8 V 5.2 AH pack, and is mostly used on mains, not off grid.
How much capacity does the 7KWH battery have after 700 cycles of 50% discharge (i.e. Off grid and using electricity every night, the sun don't shine)?
Weight or space isn't an issue for fixed solar applications, mobile mast or telephone exchange backup. Hence they use Lead Acid.
In Europe almost all the lead in Lead Acid batteries is recycled to make Lead Acid Batteries. The manufacturing cost and energy input to make Lead Acid batteries is far lower than the same capacity of NiMH or Lithium Ion. They are simple, and also with recycling much "greener".
It depends on the binder used on the oxide and the storage conditions. In the pre-cassette Reel to Reel era they produced a rubbish formulation. Earlier and later tapes are OK.
With actual computer "tape backups", some tapes of entry level floppy interface drives could be unreadable a week later, or other tapes could be OK years later depending on maintenance of drive, atmosphere at the computer, make of tape and the tape storage.
Exactly how does a single market affect that?
Someone Polish in Ireland or UK can buy Polish DVDs & CDs & Polish food.
They can install a dish and take out a sub to Cyfra
I can watch/listen FTA Polish, German, French, UK TV /Radio via satellite. At night get UK Radio, Daytime Five Live MW, R.Wales MW, and R4LW. All in Mid-West of Ireland.
The issue seems to be Pay TV services artificially limited.
But even outside of EU, "regionalisation" encryption of DVD, Blu Ray and Games is greed and laziness. Inside or outside EU It's nothing to do with protecting niche producers / languages / cultures.
But the analysis of the wafer thin margins due to diverse languages is one tiny bit of the issue.
It's USA / Sport / Big Corporations determination to squeeze as much as possible is the biggest problem.
Sky and Hollywood & Co. are a major issue.
Sky certainly should not be allowed to be a pay TV platform (in many countries) AND ALSO have control of Pay TV channels. They must divest Sky1, Sky Sports and Sky News etc, or be a content provider and divest of the Satellite Pay TV platforms.
They should also be forced to supply CAMs for TVs and satellite boxes rather that foist their proprietary box which doesn't work properly for non-Sky EPG channels and is crippled for FTA without a sub. They are effectively a cable TV via dish. Outside of urban areas in UK & Ireland they have a Pay TV monopoly.
As for the BBC? Much of their geo blocking (even to force block of UK people from non-UK BBC Web content and vice versa, just regular articles) doesn't even make commercial or "rights holder" sense.
Yes the so far proposed ideas are a nonsense. But certain sectors are determined to ignore the common market. Books, DVD, CD, BluRay is more or less one market. So the "small" language media content source argument is somehow faulty.
Like the vast majority of US / Japan originated designs in the Past
Kluged for PAL
Graphics card TV out NTSC/PAL jumpers that didn't work
Cards that had 640 x 480 inside overscan area on NTSC but simply cropped 800 x 600 to do PAL (768 x 576 visible).
How many PAL resolution LCD panels where there ever?
Portable LCD TVs all based on half US SD resolution (240 lines) even if 800 or 1024 pixels wide.
Today's Nvidia cards were you have to create your own HDMI HD 50Hz modes and (60Hz modes included) every time the driver is upgraded it erases all trace of your custom settings.
This is no surprise at all.
I even have one DVD that is 24fps -> 3:2 pull down NTSC 30fps converted to 25 fps interlace (Most DVDs from Film sources are 480 line 24fps progressive for Region 1 with the player doing 3:2 pull down for interlace or using component to play progressive. For PAL regions the Film source is 576 lines on the DVD and the sound is corrected by 24/25ths so player simply plays the 24fps progressive source at 25fps (interlace or progressive).
It's not hard at all to do it right. You don't need a Blu Ray disk. All streaming video and DVDs also have the required metadata for HD and especially for SD.
Yes, The error of false authority, Schneier is undoubtedly a genius in many areas and the leading expert on Cryptography and a good exposer of fake security solutions and responses.
But that doesn't make him an expert at everything and certainly not on what to do about privacy. Cory Doctorow and Martha Lane Fox are blinkered ideologues and are far far worse than Schneier's worst ideas in this area.
Not by auctions.
Only by the use of the users. It's such a limited resource it needs to have one infrastructure per mobile band. Multiple physical operators splits the spectrum leading to over 50% inefficiency.
We need many different Spectrum uses, not just mobile. Under recent schemes the Mobile operators are favoured.
Since start of 3G auctions this has been a massive failure.
The so called Digital Dividend is a massive disaster for Terrestrial Broadcast and consumer, for a once of treasury injection and slight lowering of Mobile Operator costs with little long term increase in capacity or coverage. The auction idea encourages Regulators to have almost no conditions imposed.
Cable, Internet, Mobile and Satellite can't replace Broadcast and many other specialist services that need spectrum.
Even various satellite services have been threatened by foolish highest bidder spectrum auctions and religion of Mobile (Light squared in USA).
The rest of the article is only brilliant. Give me a call Worstal and I'll explain why Spectrum is a special case and why you can only have retail competition on Mobile, but the infrastructure needs to be a single operation for large geographic areas.
And if CE mark properly policed none of the these spectrum hog Transmitters would be on the market.
The testing is a lie as they do not test correctly.
They are really transmitters. It's impossible to transfer at more than about 0.1Mbps on house mains wiring without out illegal transmission.
Notching Amateur bands is a sop! It proves they are illegal. The Broadcasters are entitled to the same protection.
It's Stereoscopic overlays. It's not really 3D and not remotely ANYTHING to do with Holograms.
Real Holograms and actual 3D work with one eye and don't cause eye strain. This is an illusion (2D Stereoscopic), so for 15% or more it doesn't work. For most people there is the focusing distance conflict between real distances and the Stereo image which is in a single plane, a single distance. The 3D illusion caused by stereoscopic offsets thus cause eye strain as the eye fruitlessly focus to further or nearer but image is really at a single distance.
No, NO ONE should be using iPad, Surface Pro, Kindle Fire or Domestic Android tablet for this application.
OS too fragile
HW too fragile.
At the very worse something like a Panasonic ToughPad, with Linux rather than consumer Android or "Windows" and locked down to prevent users adding applications.
Edit:
While QNX was great on embedded systems and disk controllers, I'd not use a Blackberry either.
This is the issue. Not the ease of voting or speed of counting.
The eVoting is pointless and no matter how secure can be "edited" by those with the keys. Yes, paper systems can be "stuffed" and "gamed" too, but it's very much harder.
Digital for the sake of being Digital is foolish and is simply "fashion".