"You can jailbreak your iPhone and use alternate app stores."
I was under the impression that Apple repeatedly attempt to close jailbreaking opportunities.
3894 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Nov 2007
"In reality it would be for the Speaker of the day to pull an opinion out of their ass and rationalise it however they can. Not quite as unconstitutional as the US's written protection backed by courts but a significant barrier."
I'd be highly surprised if any court in England would accept it. In which case it's essentially as protective as the US's version.
"Sending muggers and burglars to jail also is very expensive, it would be cheaper to give half the money to the naughty people in return for staying at home and behaving themselves"
I'm confused. Did you think I was against spending money to convict criminals? I'm not, I think more should be spent, particularly by HMRC for tax-dodging (as that's actually a profit, not an expenditure).
"the high cost of pursuing IT Protect may raise eyebrows among fans of strong enforcement."
It's almost as if having a robust legal system that doesn't just allow the government to crush you into pieces without due process costs time and money.
Note that if the director had paid the fine properly then no problem. But he didn't, and got apparently really bad (or no) legal advice. "I didn't pay the fine because I didn't like it" isn't going to work.
I currently need access to a particular server at work for HPC. As I am the only authorized user of this computer, and I only need it for HPC, and it does not need access to the rest of the work network, I suggested that that server be disconnected from the work network, so that I don't need to perform achingly slow TFA to do some work on it.
While things need to be locked down, we also have to think imaginatively about how to allow effective working while maintaining security. It doesn't matter if this particular machine gets pwned. There's no sensitive data on it, and it can be wiped and reimaged in less than an hour. It's better to put the firewall between it and the rest of the network than slow my access down. (An ideal solution would be to put the machine under my desk at home, but amazingly that wasn't an option.)
"What I am trying to say is, rather than trying to lock down everything and contrain your employees into narrowly defined processes of what management thinks is their job; hire competent people, give them all the access they ask for, and trust them to use that access appropriately. That is how you get work done."
So which bit did Morrissons get wrong? It was the trust bit, I suppose?
"do not fancy the in-between scenarios where reacting to emergency will be slower if focus has been lost due to partial automation"
I agree with you, but I have found the manually set speed limiter to be very useful when going through roadworks or average/reduced speed areas, particularly on the A34 round Oxford where there's a 50 section with a police <redacted>.
"1) An (otherwise empty) motorway with a middle lane has a WHOLE LANE in which you can overtake said 'clown'. What is your problem?
2) If said 'clown' is already travelling at the motorway speed limit, you are in breach of the law in overtaking."
Interesting juxtaposition. Middle-lane hogging is also an offence.
"It sounds more like breach of contract."
It doesn't sound like that at all. If you have a contract that says 'one-month notice period, cash £x', I activate the notice period, and then offering a piece of paper saying 'two-week notice period, cash £x*0.8', you aren't forced to sign it, you can walk away.
"The article clearly says that they haven't had their duties changed so its not a case of low demand"
You are looking at the wrong market. Demand for BT's service is holding up, sure, but demand for contractors is low. Thus the price drops until the excess suppply (i.e., people) clear the market (i.e., leave) and a new equilibrium is found. Once the job market starts to look better, rates will start to pick up as companies hunt for contractors. The flip side to being able to quit at will and take a new, higher-paying gig, is the opposite.
"Do I re-negotiate my BT Broadband under the same terms?"
If there is a material change in the terms of the contract, then you should be able to break it, or at least that was my understanding.
"I have recently been migrated (against my wishes) to "Fibre down the street" it is a lot more tempremental with it being slow at peak times."
This sounds like a material detriment. Contact BT, make a complaint, and then if it isn't resolved, you might have a case to break your contract without penalty.
"It's simply taking advantage of the fact that many contractors don't have anywhere else to go at the moment as an excuse to squeeze contract terms."
Well, yes. This is the nature of contract work. You can charge big fees when you are in high demand, but when there's low demand you can't. I'm surprised it's only 20%, to be honest.
"And it describes a harassment effort that consisted, among other things, of sending the newsletter publishers live cockroaches, the head of a fetal pig, a funeral wreath, a mask of a bloody pig's head, and a book on surviving the loss of a spouse."
Oracle liar, sorry I meant lawyer, said:
"In a more than 200-page decision, Judge Clark found no evidence of discrimination. We have been subject to years of harassment by Department of Labor employees with no evidence of discrimination whatsoever."
The actual judge actually said
"A number of current and former Oracle employees appeared and offered their anecdotal experiences. While I appreciated the time and courage it took for those witnesses to appear at this hearing, the case is ultimately not about whether or not any individual instance of discrimination occurred or how witnesses may have been treated in a particular circumstance."
So this is a Trump-like complete exoneration, in the sense that there were many examples of foul play, just not the right kind of foul play for the particular charge being investigated.
"All that I typed just beats a dead horse as you already know the reasons why they don't sell"
I already have a phone and this is the same, just a bit better*?
It's kind of the same reason I don't buy a new car every year.
* For example, the screen is probably not smashed.
Ren Zhiqiang called Winnie the Xi a clown for his covid response, and then promptly disappeared and turned up in a Chinese jail. 18 years for some nonsense charges. And he was a powerful businessman.
Let me know when the same thing happens in the US. Trump might not like people calling him nasty names, but he hasn't had the Secret Service kidnap people for it.
"How much US debt does China hold now? In terms of US GDP?"
Who cares? You cannot call in government paper, so the only thing they can do is sell it. There are plenty of buyers for small amounts of teasury notes, and you cannot shift large mounts of it for the precise reasons above, that you need to sell it and buy something else with it, as there's no such thing as pure money.
"Chinas BRI is very extensive, giving them a huge market to play with this. It may well become the only digital currency that is sovereign backed and there are large parts of the world, including the oil producers, who may well have no problem using it."
No. To understand why you need to know what a global reserve currency needs to have:
1) A deep and liquid bond market, so that money can be stored in that denominated currency, backed by a central bank that one trusts not to debase the currency;
2) No capital controls of any sort.
China will need to have both of those to have a chance, and it refuses to do 2), and 1) will not be around for a while.
"OkK, the USA, Europe and the UK etc ain't much better"
Actually they are much better, just not good, even given BJ and DT. Our legal systems are by and large independent, less so in the US given the fact that the president and senate have so much control over Spreme Court appointments, whereas nobody with half a brain thinks that Chinese court verdicts aren't decided by the CCP.
"As ARM is now Japanese owned and sold to an American firm so this is now a deal between a Japanese and an American firm. ARM is no longer British owned so there is very little involvement by the UK government."
Well, Donald Trump seems to be able to force the sale of a Chinese company to an American one, so it is possible to be involved. Whether the UK government has the power/lack of morals to do so is different.
"It's called "capitalism""..."
It's not capitalism. It's just reality. Unless you want to live in a society without property, in which all things are decreed by a central dictator and people do what they are told or die, you need a medium of exchange. Even in barter economies, if you need food and you have only a cow, you can either barter the cow for food or kill the cow and eat it. You then won't be able to use the milk to pay for other things people have.
If you need liquid assets and have only illiquid ones, you have to liquidate your assets.
"Your point being, you're ok with your country doing plenty of bad things, as long as you're able to point to something even worse being done somewhere else?"
No. My point is that if a is a bad thing, and b is a bad thing, then a and b are not the same.
Try to keep some perspective. Do you genuinely, really, think that the UK and China are equal in terms of their treatment of human rights? If you do, you are utterly beyond help.
"China wants nuclear disarmament"
China has nuclear weapons.
"gender equality",
According to the 2020 WEF global gender gap report, China is in the bottom half of countries for gender equality.
"respect for intellectual property"
Well, say no more.
"settlement for refugees"
Number of refugees per 1000 inhabitants (mid-2015 figures, the latest comparable):
China: 0.22. UK: 1.87. US: 0.84.
Physician, heal thyself. (One good start would be to take every Syrian refugee from Turkey. That would bring China closer to, but not equal to, the UK's refugee figure.)
"A code audit carried out by FTI Consulting was said to have revealed no causes for concern, with DJI posting the exec summary (but not the full audit) on its website as a PDF. It had access to 20 million lines of source code, according to the summary, with analysis focusing on code concerned with “communication protocols and network activity with host infrastructure”."
1) 20m lines? So FTI Consulting read through (approximately) 2000 books' worth of code? Sure they checked every single last bit of it.
2) And how (unless it's open source, and that was not mentioned in the article) does the end user know that the compiled version of the code on their drone is that audited by FTI?
3) And who thinks that any number of code audits will actually make a difference?
"Including the whim of a party who decide that the rules don't apply to them because they want more profit so proceed to screw their users over by picking a fight they can't win."
Sorry, are you talking about Epic or Apple?