OK, the reality is that a cable snapped in August, and safety investigations showed that it was going to be a real pain to fix safely. Just as they were about to start to begin repairs, another one popped in November, and it was deemed far too dangerous to fix, as people's safety is more important than a telescope near the end of its life anyway.
Posts by DavCrav
3894 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Nov 2007
Page:
A tale of two nations: See China blast off from the Moon as drone shows America's Arecibo telescope falling apart
China unleashes fearsome new cyber-weapon: A very provocative meme
Re: re: <title is too long>
This is not a meme. This is a staged photograph of a soldier with a knife to a baby, with a comment along the lines of 'how dare Aussies knife babies'. It's just lies and defamatory, nothing more.
That's not a humorous picture pointing out how Xi looks like a fat cartoon bear. Which is a fact.
Where's the mysterious metal monolith today then? Oh look, it's atop a California mountain
Sod Crysis, can the 21-year-old Power Mac G4 Cube run Minecraft? The answer is yes
Re: Hacks all the way down?
"Going to the store and purchasing upgrade hardware, installing it according to instructions, and then running a piece of software that required the upgraded hardware to run is not a hack."
No. The hack is where you are still claiming you did it on the old computer.
Put it this way: suppose you want to prove that a particular car can do a lap of a track in a particular time. It doesn't, so you replace the engine, uprate the suspension, remove the spare seats, add slicks, and then you can. Were you right?
"Yet because modern kit has more capability, the developers couldn't resist sticking way more graphical complexity in than was required."
Sure, but there are probably two effects here:
1) Because it's only going to play on much better hardware, there's no incentive to optimize, as optimization takes time and thinking. Tiem and thinking that could be spent bashing out another mobile game to get more money.
2) Computer programming is very easy. Computer programming well is not. The number of people who can create fast, efficient code, is far smaller than the number of people producing code.
Case in point: Megadrive/SNES roms are around 1MB in size, many smaller. For an entire game. Space Academy Year 1, which has better graphics, but not massively better, than an old RPG game on the Megadrive (and the only one I have installed right now) is 765MB. A lot of that is texture files, sure. But now people will just paint a big tile rather than code the tile. I found in one game that they needed a black background for one menu and simply created a massive black picture file to use. Quick and dirty.
"I'd argue that an old Mac, Amiga, ST, DOS PC - or even CP/M machine is just as effective for over 90% of users, 90% of the time."
No. At least an old Amiga anyway. I used to write my English homework on an A600. Without a memory module upgrade to 2MB RAM you couldn't save a document and then print it. So you have to write everything in one sitting, then print it, and then keep hold of the paper copy.
(Edit: you could print it and then save it, that wouldn't crash it. But you couldn't load a document and then print it, as it had run out of memory, so the effect was the same.)
.org owner Internet Society puts its money where its mouth is with additional IETF funding
Hacker given three years for stealing secret Nintendo Switch blueprints, collecting child sex abuse vids
When it comes to taxing tech giants, America is out, France is in, Canada and Indonesia are going their own way
"Meanwhile, Indonesia has also seen an opportunity, and said that it will now start collecting a 10 per cent tax that it introduced in the middle of 2020. Previously it said that it would hold off collecting the levy until there was a global agreement. France has said pretty much the same thing: it will end its tax when global consensus is reached."
Those two things are actually the opposite of each other, not similar.
Calls for 'right to repair' electronics laws grow louder across Europe
Re: @Dwarf
"Which gets punished. But not what we are talking about unless you think so many businesses are running such?"
I was going to comment on other things in your post, but I decided that this morsel is the most illuminating. Oligopolies naturally form cartel-like behaviours without formally being a cartel. I guess you didn't do A-level economics (as you stated) because even there one finds out about non-price competition in duopolies.
It's a basic fact of the last thirty years or so that there is increasing consolidation in more or less every sector of corporate life, particulary in the US. With this consolidation comes much greater profits, and those come from the consumer, eventually. US companies are significantly more profitable than their European counterparts, and it's believed that consolidation is the reason for most of this variation. Large companies merge because they predict the ability to raise prices, reduce service quality, and therefore increase profits.
Apple makes a battery that cannot be swapped. But now so do almost every other manufacturer. Unless you want a Fairphone, you cannot get a user-repairable phone. Since Fairphone produce such a thing, it is clearly possible. But other manufacturers do not produce them. I, personally, have a list of things I want from my phone and the Fairphone doesn't fit them, so I cannot have one, but I would prefer a phone with their repairability, with other features. Such a phone is not available to me, so I cannot express my preference and purchase one.
Revealed preferences only work if there are the following features to the market:
1) Perfect information. Manufacturers hide significant amounts of information about their product. You cannot find out estimated failure rates of components of a new car, for example, because manufacturers do not provide them.
2) Low or zero barriers to entry. This is necessary because unsatisfied demand, say for a repairable phone, would be satisfied by a new entrant into the market, thus forcing current manufacturers to adapt to the demands of the market. Of course, unless you have a spare few billion you cannot set up your own phone manufacturer, so this one's difficult as well.
Of these, 2) is much more important than 1). With high barriers to entry, either natural (complex machinery) or artifical (advertising, regulation, restricted supply), the preferences of consumers can be subverted by manufacturers who can simply refuse to provide what the customer wants.
As a case study, consider gyms. Nobody wants a 12-month rolling contract. But that's what you get because fuck you. So PureGym was set up to take advantage of this untapped demand. The trouble is, PureGym cannot expend very easily, because barriers to entry are high: you have to buiild a lot of gyms. It took a long time for this competitor to become established, because the barriers to entry in this market are pretty high. PureGym, which gives customers what they want, is now the largest gym chain in the UK.
But ten years ago, your argument would have been that people really want 12-month contracts because look, that's what people are buying.
Re: @Dwarf
"That is where we do live in a free market. We have expressed preferences (want to choose who fixes my stuff) and revealed preferences which is what people actually do. It is free market which has brought this through consumer choice."
Please stop with your A-level economics. You have to take into account asymmetric information, where I do not know that the piece of equipment is difficult to repair, and cartel/oligopoly behaviour, where there are only a few manufacturers of a product , each of whom does the behaviour. You think HP could get away with their ink shenanigans if there were genuine, well-informed, choices available to consumers?
How the US attacked Huawei: Former CEO of DocuSign and Ariba turned diplomat Keith Krach tells his tale
Re: "People trust the USA ?"
"The US President is less trusted than the Russian or Chinese Leaders."
That's fair. Trump is unpredictable. He lurches from position to position and therefore I cannot trust him. I can trust Putin and Xi, because I understand their goals: expansionism, repression at home, and interference overseas. I mean, I trust them to stab me first opportunity they get, but since I know that, I can trust them to do that.
With Trump, I just don't know.
Boeing 737 Max will return to flight after software updates, says EU's aviation regulator
Re: Suppose Boeing was Chinese
"but in this case I think you have it dead wrong."
They literally did this with a pandemic, about a year ago. (Human-to-human transmission was known to CCP long before they announced it, unless they just happened to start buying massive quantities of PPE and respirators for no particular reason for two weeks or so before the announcement.)
They have since slapped massive sanctions on Australia for asking difficult questions.
Re: Suppose Boeing was Chinese
"The Chinese government would definitely have jailed the managers responsible for bringing disgrace to the country. Note they still would had made efforts to hide the incident from the general public (local and international), but simply to avoid the embarrassment."
I don't think that's quite right. They would have jailed/executed the managers responsible for face reasons, but they would have dressed it up as tax evasion or corruption, rather than let the real reason be known. (Like with all the other people jailed/executed for corruption in real life.) What I mean is, they wouldn't have 'made efforts to hide', they would have tried to cover it up entirely. And that includes jailing/executing any whistle-blowers as well. Then produced a software patch and try to silently install it on those jets in service. Hopefully without anyone noticing.
"Why would you be a bit concerned about it?"
Because generally the pandemic has led a large number of people to re-evaluate their attitudes towards safety. Flying is only slightly more dangerous than before (because of issues with maintenance) but perception of risk has changed.
"The 777 is arguably the safest jet Boeing has ever produced"
Hops from Heathrow to Frankfurt are generally done by A320s, or possibly a 737 normal. I think all of the BA trips I've been on for that journey have been A320s, although I forget which variant. I don't think the neo.
"How about a Ju 52?"
One crash since 1939? Boeing would love that safety record.
Also, hopefully there are planes between WWII and modern ones? 747-400s are pretty safe nowadays, aren't they?
After the whole Covid thing, and Boeing nosediving, and planes possibly not being maintained very well while grounded, I am not 100% looking forward to travelling to Germany next August. It'll be my first flight in several years now (kids and then pandemic) and I actually genuinely am a bit concerned about it.
Ticketmaster: We're not liable for credit card badness because the hack straddled GDPR day
Re: Ticket master
"Ticketmaster exists for the same reason Amazon & ebay do. People's own web stores, shipping, and customer service are usually totally crap."
Yeah, if these venues had their own e-shops, with their l;ow-budget IT department, they might end up with card-skimming malware for years without anyone noticing.
Frenchman who wanted to 'smash a guy's face in' fined €135 – despite correctly filling out paperwork stating why he left home during lockdown
Re: Bore-out compensation
Can I just say that I am sorry to hear about your mental breakdown, and am glad that you have recovered. Can I also point out how the first two people's responses were not about your mental issues, but questions about the chain mail.
(People, this is why it is claimed that IT is not a nurturing environment...)
Not sunshine, moonlight or good times – blame it on the buggy
Re: The First Law Of Computing
"Any error blamed on a computer is the direct result of at least two human errors, one of which is blaming it on the computer in the first place."
Except for cosmic rays. They genuinely do generate non-human errors. I know of at least one occasion of a bit flip caused by a cosmic ray.
Shocking revelations from Huawei-commissioned report: Huawei is good for the UK's economy so don't ban them
"This is in addition to £1.1bn in tax receipts."
This is nothing but a tissue of lies. If Huawei is counting the spending of its employees in coffee shops as its contribution, it cannot count its direct contribution, as that is spending by other people's employees on mobile phones. Also, Huawei shouldn't be claiming tax paid by its employees as its own. Its employees pay that. The only figure is the £100m-odd one.
If this sort of lying is allowed to stand, then each company and person put together would 'contribute' around £10 for every real £1 in actual, genuine tax receipts.
Billionaire's Pagani Pa-gone-i after teen son takes hypercar out for a drive, trashes it
Test and Trace chief Dido Harding prompted to self-isolate by NHS COVID-19 app
Brit accused of spying on 772 people via webcam CCTV software tells court he'd end his life if extradited to US
Re: Team America: World Police
Driving on the wrong side of the road for a length of time (i.e., not momentarily drifting) would be likely classified as dangerous driving rather than careless driving.
And legging it to another country is considered an aggravating factor in this case. I would expect the maximum (or close to it) sentence to be handed down, like Assange was handed 51 weeks (maximum 52 weeks) because of the egregious aggravating factor.
Re: Team America: World Police
"Their legal system allows for criminals to be charged where the victim is, so they have applied for extradition."
That's absolutely fine. I think the problem that I, and many others here, have, is where this is accepted by the UK court system.
This one-way extradition treaty has to end.
Much like the British on holiday, NHS COVID-19 app refuses to work with phones using unsupported languages
Huawei's financials take a beating as President Trump's sanctions come home to roost
"What on Earth are you on about?"
Everyone knows about the mass imprisonments, the medical experiments on prisoners, the organ harvesting, the murder of Indian soldiers, the kidnap diplomacy, the threatening countries for offering asylum, and so on. The other one is a million Han men being shipped over to be married off to Muslim women, against their will, and living with them.
So industiral-scale sex slavery.
Researchers made an OpenAI GPT-3 medical chatbot as an experiment. It told a mock patient to kill themselves
Finding remote working a bit of a grind? Microsoft staffers feel your pain
Re: "without ANY compensation"
"HMRC is allowing people working from home to claim money back for increased heating bills"
Yes, an increase in the tax-free allowance of £6/week, so less than £3/week cash. The removal of commuting costs and time are for me a vastly larger benefit. An order of magnitude better, likely two depending on how you cost your time.
Is it Iran or Russia's hackers we need to worry about? The Russians, definitely the Russians, says US intelligence
Re: Here's something you may not know.
"It's because Putin flat out hates Hillary. When Hillary was Secretary of State during the Obama administration, she ran a covert operation, in Russia, that interfered with Putin's reelection campaign."
I indeed have never heard about this. Can you provide some evidence of it? Because some Googling came up with nothing either. And something at least slightly reputable please, not Rudy Guiliani for example.