* Posts by DavCrav

3894 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Nov 2007

Indian app that deleted Chinese apps from Androids deleted from Play Store

DavCrav

Re: Isn't this what Antivirus / Anti malware software does?

This article by Raymond Chen on why you cannot have a super-duper must-always-be-on-top window is slightly appropriate here.

Publishers sue to shut down books-for-all Internet Archive for 'willful digital piracy on an industrial scale'

DavCrav

"A "potential sale" is not an actual sale that has been lost. I am not spending over 1/4 my monthly income on a stupid $250 book - regardless if I must do without or pirate it!"

I agree that copies made are not equal to lost sales, that's ludicrous. All that tells you is the demand for the product at cost epsilon (not free, because there is a slight chance of being caught). However, some of the people pirating stuff would have bought it otherwise, or at least bought some stuff. Think of people with massive illegal music collections. If they didn't have that, would they have bought all of it? Of course not. Would they have bought absolutely none of it? Probably not either.

There are positions other than 'each copy = lost sale' and 'not (any copy = lost sale)'.

DavCrav

"Theft was the only crime, whether the loot was gold, innocence, land or life. And for the thief-taker, there was the chase…"

It's from Jingo.

DavCrav

"What do they now possess that you do not?"

I cannot find the Pratchett quotation at the moment, but in one of his books he said something along the lines of 'all crime is, at its basic level, theft'. Murder is theft of life, rape is theft of the ability to consent. And so on. Copyright infringement, to give it its correct term, is the theft of my ability to decide what to do with my ideas and work.

Part of the social contract is that the work reverts to the public domain in just over a century or so, and that's fine. I think it should be earlier, but that's a debateable point. I think most people think copyright should last longer than a year though, which is how long my latest book has been published.

DavCrav

"Hey comrade, what happened to "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs"?"

You don't need to read my books.

DavCrav

Re: It's really quite simple

"Out of print isn't tough, it's negligence."

Springer-Verlag, it appears, has digitized their entire back catalogue and will do print on demand, for a relatively reasonable price, for any book.

DavCrav

"Don't forget that one digital copy given away can very quickly become one hundred thousand pirate copies."

It can, and I can live with someone sending it to their colleagues. Indeed, I give it to one person specifically knowing that he will do that. I would not expect them to stick it on their website.

DavCrav

"The authors are the only ones that can change this part of the equation. They need to step up before outright piracy, or unpaid open works, become the social norm."

Sorry, so I should engage with thieves, and try to undercut free? Yeah, that's going to work.

Let's be clear here. Almost all books are published by people who are not rich. Copying them deprives them of either money (if you were going to buy it otherwise) or the ability to control who gets to access their book (if you weren't).

Nobody has any divine right to read my work for free. Pay or I stop doing it.

DavCrav

Let's be clear here. This is theft on a biblical scale. I don't know what the IA was thinking. As a published author, they have stolen from me. I'm not impressed.

I frequently give free electronic copies of my books away, more or less to anyone who asks, but that's very different from me grabbing a million of other people's books and handing them out to anyone who can find a website.

Not the Wright stuff: Bitcoin 'inventor' loses bid to sue YouTuber who called him a liar

DavCrav

Yes, but in this case, he lives in Surrey. He might be money-grubbing, and he might be a foreigner, but I thought we still allowed foreigners resident in the UK to avail themselves of our legal system.

DavCrav

This is true. Sorry, I mean England and Wales. Scotland, as you point out, has a (sometimes slightly, sometimes very) different legal system.

DavCrav

Re: Libel tourism

"He happens to be living in Surrey now, but the judges accepted the argument that this was incidental to where the alleged defamation actually took place."

He lives in Surrey. Right, so we agree that he is ordinarily resident in the UK. So it isn't tourism to use your home court. My partner is German; should she have to go back to Germany to sue someone?

Note that Wright has been (successfully) sued in the US, despite not being born there, a national there, or living there. To call this libel tourism is bullshit.

(I'm not saying he's right, I'm saying it's not libel tourism to sue someone in your local court.)

DavCrav

Re: Libel tourism

"So Wright tried libel tourism"

Is that what suing someone in your own country is called now?

DavCrav

OK, I might be forgetting my recent history here. But I was under the impression that, in the UK, if even a small number of people in the UK viewed a website/video/whatever, it was considered to be 'published' in the UK for the purposes of libel. Maybe there's something different about this particular case, or maybe I'm remembering wrongly.

Twitter, Reddit and pals super unhappy US visa hopefuls have to declare their online handles to Uncle Sam

DavCrav

Re: not all speech is protected

"Speech advocating comitting a crime is not protected speech."

Donald Trump does that all the time, and claims it is protected.

"Speech advocating overthrowing the national government is not protected."

Donald Trump does that quite regularly recently, although with state governments rather than himself, and claims it is protected.

Guess who came thiiis close to signing off a €102k annual budget? Austria. Someone omitted 'figures in millions'

DavCrav

Re: airbus wiring

"I mean, it either gets the right answer for that loom or not."

I thought about this a little more this morning when I was telling something else. I can imagine the bug fix report. It's one of:

"Fixed bug in version 6.2, where wires were bent too much and broke."

"Fixed bug in version 6.2. It turns out we weren't bending wires nearly enough."

DavCrav

Re: airbus wiring

That's both interesting and terrifying. There is no 'different way' to calculate bending radius, surely? I mean, it either gets the right answer for that loom or not.

DavCrav

Re: the key words "figures in billions"

So he asked his colleagues to not use it to mean million million, not that it was 'officially' changed. Right.

On the other hand, I remember Gordon Brown using 'thousand million' in a Budget, although I can only find one example of his doing so online, in 2010.

1996 Fowler says that old billion was still commonly used, and 1965 Fowler argued for the new billion.

DavCrav

"saw a program, about building planes...one of the new Airbus? (have not currently googled the details)...France's software ran in one unit (inches or cm), Germany's software ran in the other."

I'd be highly surprised if it were, both countries having used the metric system for over a century. That seems like more of a US thing. So my guess would be Boeing. You know, because they haven't cocked up enough recently.

Edit: I've looked for a few minutes. Either my Google-fu is lacking or this didn't happen.

DavCrav

Re: the key words "figures in billions"

"What's next, changing the gallon to be a mere 3.8 litres?"

You mean changing it back to 3.8l? English measures changed over time. US ones were crystallized at a point in time, using the Queen Anne 1706 gallon of 231 cubic inches. In the 19th century Britain redefined the gallon to be more capacious (but complicated, roughly 277.274 cubic inches, and based on distilled water at specific air pressure and temperature), and then only in 1976 was it standardized as 277.4194 cubic inches.

DavCrav

Re: the key words "figures in billions"

"British English was changed in 1974"

That's weirdly specific. Since there is no Academie Francaise for British English, in what sense was it changed, and who changed it? I agree that one billion is now a thousand million, but even when I was a child (and I was born after 1974) there was confusion over what a billion meant.

Switzerland 'first' country to roll out contact-tracing app using Apple-Google APIs to track coronavirus spread

DavCrav

"Do they have an estimate of the number of false positives, as a percentage of the presumed contacts and as a percentage of the total population condemned to self-isolation. "

Unconstrained R0 is around 3. So (on average) you will have n-3 false positives, where n is the number of distinct people you interact with over the last week or so (I think, but am not sure, that this is the period in question).

Of course, not everyone has the app. If m do (0 < m < 1) then you should obtain m(n-3) false positives in general (and 3m false negatives, i.e., infected not picked up).

DavCrav

Re: Contact tracing?

"So this has never been necessary before and nobody ever saw any reason to develop anything for it? It seems that nobody ever thought that there would ever be a pandemic or epidemic that might need this happening."

It's only been the last couple of years where such an app has even been possible.

"We were caught completely unprepared because the government ignored any suggestion that there might be anything like this in the future."

You mean every government in the world. There was nobody anywhere that had a pandemic tracking app ready to roll. Some countries already had tracking apps that they repurposed, but those were for a very different use.

Boeing brings back the 737 Max but also lays off thousands

DavCrav

Re: "more than a dozen initiatives focused on enhancing workplace safety and product quality"

"manufacturing skills quickly decline"

Unfortunately, the plane also had a habit of declining. Into the ground.

Broadcom sends its England-based staff back into office as UK lockdown eases – though Welsh workers get a free pass

DavCrav

In case there is further confusion on this issue, I would like to offer a fact-based journalistic article about this issue, and an opinion piece about it. Exercise for the reader: compare and contrast.

-----------

Fact-based journalism.

In Cummings's press conference he admitted breaching lockdown on two separate occasions, and offered an excuse that he claimed was reasonable for a third. The first breach occurred when he went to work despite his partner exhibiting covid-like symptoms. No reasoning was given. He used as his reasonable excuse for leaving London shortly after a subsection of the regulations intended to cover victims of domestic abuse.

While in Durham, Cummings admitted breaching lockdown to take a trip to Barnard Castle. His reason was to test his eyesight. This excuse was not widely believed by those in attendance. If this reasoning were true, it would be a direct breach of the Road Traffic Act, as it is unsurprisingly illegal to test one's eyesight by driving for an hour with a four-year old in the car. In addition, it is almost certain not to be considered a reasonable excuse under the Coronavirus Act.

His wife accompanied him on this eyesight-testing trip. She is an experienced driver in her own right. A Downing St spokesperson claimed it was "irrelevant" that the day the family embarked on a trip to a local beauty spot in apparent breach of lockdown was the wife's birthday.

-----------

Opinion piece:

Cummings's press conference was clearly a pack of lies, from start of finish. His excuse of going on an eyesight-testing trip on his wife's birthday was so ludicrous it makes one wonder if his Svengali credentials aren't just a little overblown.

The only reason he hasn't been fed to the dogs by now, like Ferguson was, is that Boris Johnson is so unable to perform as a Prime Minister (unlike his ability to perform at fathering, and then abandoning, children) that he simply cannot fire the man with his hand up his backside. Of course Johnson thinks looking after your own children is an exceptional circumstance. He's never had to do it in his life.

Cummings clearly broke the law, but he'll get away with it because he's powerful and you aren't. Johnson won't fire him, because he's so utterly useless at politics that he wouldn't survive a week without him. He's willing to destroy 'his' entire government's health message in order to save his boss's job. Johnson is a disgrace to the skin he occupies. He's an incompetent, arrogant, pathetic excuse for a human being, from the tip of his stupid hair to the soles of his stupid feet.

History, and hopefully a jury, will judge him.

-----------

Hope this helps.

DavCrav

"Reporting the news and facts becomes a political opinion piece on the actions of Dominic Cummings."

It's not an opinion piece. Cummings did break lockdown.

"Call this journalism?"

What? Telling people stuff governments prefer you to 'move on' from? Yes.

BoJo buckles: UK govt to cut Huawei 5G kit use 'to zero by 2023' after pressure from Tory MPs, Uncle Sam

DavCrav

Re: So...

Don't forget the '5G signals suck oxygen out of the atmosphere' crowd.

DavCrav

"ARM was * bought * by a * Japanese * company."

I'm sure it's all the same to him, of course.

But Softbank, while domiciled in Japan, are not entirely Japanese. Their Vision Fund rounds 1 and (probably not 2), in which Softbank is heavily invested, are substantially funded by others, most notably some totally-fun Gulf states. Masayoshi Son is in a spot of bother at the moment. WeWork and Uber are two big bets with the Vision Fund, both turning brown at pace. Softbank recently took a massive charge on their investment in VF, which lost around $18 billion this year.

The VF owns (I believe) a quarter of ARM Holdings.

DavCrav

Re: So...

"There is no accounting for the brain-dead stupid lot who think (or perhaps cannot think at all) a virus comes out of radios."

To be fair, that's not what they think, that would be crazy. What they 'think' is that COVID-19 is a cover story and these people are being killed by 5G signals. That's why they are assaulting cable layers and 4G masts. Obviously. And why countries with no 5G networks are suffering lots of COVID-19 deaths.

UK MPs to off-payroll workers: Delay IR35 reforms until 2023? You wish

DavCrav

"Law MUST be objective, it must be black and white, or you get ambiguities based on the people making decisions."

I know this is old, but I'm going to leave this here.

Look through the law and count the number of instances of 'reasonable person' being used. It's many. Even the Coronavirus Act has 'reasonable excuse' in it as a reason for breaking lockdown.

The law is subjective, on many fronts.

DavCrav

"Therefore, the only sensible course of action is to pause these reforms and take the time to properly review the impact they'll have on the self-employed."

I was under the impression that IR35 doesn't affect the self-employed. It only affects company directors and their employees, who are often the same person. But they aren't self-employed, that's the entire point.

Mind your language: Microsoft set to swing the axe on 27 languages in iOS Outlook

DavCrav

Re: You vill parle Amrecianish Da!

"that's still only about a third of those that speak Irish (at over 100,000 people). Numbers based on census data."

Well, I had a look at that census data. Around 100k people claimed to be able to speak it to some degree, not that they are Irish speakers. I can speak German to some degree, but I am far from fluent. For that matter, I can also speak French, Spanish, Italian and Russian to some degree, having been taught in all of them at various stages.

Those for whom Irish is the main home language is around 4000, which is a much more believable number.

From a Belfast Telegraph article on the subject:

"Of those adults who said they understood Irish, 5% said they had a high level of comprehension of the language and could handle radio or television programmes delivered entirely in Irish.

Some 17% could understand directions, 32% could tell the time, and 46% knew a simple phrase such as “Cead mile failte” meant a hundred thousand welcomes."

Now, I can tell the time in half a dozen languages easily. And my question is who are the 68% of people who claimed they understood Irish but can't even tell the time in it?

The reality is that Irish, at a level that most people would consider a fair standard, i.e., conversational Irish, is barely existant north of the border, and rare south of the border.

I am a better Latin speaker than more than half of those claimed 100k Irish speakers. Arlene Foster is, on this particular issue anyway, right.

Beer rating app reveals homes and identities of spies and military bods, warns Bellingcat

DavCrav

"Joe B. (bloggs123)"

Simpsons already did it.

"For privacy's sake let's call her Lisa S... No, that's too obvious, let's say L. Simpson."

Dutch spies helped Britain's GCHQ break Argentine crypto during Falklands War

DavCrav

Re: Breaks it angle

"The other possibility is that GCHQ could already decrypt Crypto AG all by themselves, but wouldn't have revealed that to a TIVC technician and quite possibly would have continued to request intel from the CIA to conceal the ability from them too."

Definitely this. If you are a state actor, and Crypto AG is an easily broken system, then there's a decent chance you have already broken it. Furthermore, you would tell more or less nobody about this. If you don't know that Crypto AG is German/US, would you tell the Germans that you broke it? And if you did know it was German/US, would you tell them? The answer's no in both cases.

It's like sitting there nodding and smiling when two friends are conversing in their own language. You definitely don't let on that you know their language if you want to know what they really think.

If American tech is used to design or make that chip, you better not ship it to Huawei, warns Uncle Sam

DavCrav

Re: And it's all based on ALLEGATIONS!

"To be fair, he's saying that they made policy decisions based on allegations, not that those were all subsequently disproved."

I believe you might be attributing much more reasonableness and nuance in the argument than is due.

DavCrav

Re: And it's all based on ALLEGATIONS!

What evidence? Some guy at OCPW who disagrees with everyone else there, and who the Russian government invited to speak?

You're going to need more than 'everybody knows that's a lie' stuff. All major international organizations, all major NGOs, everyone with any kind of reputation, and not tied to Syria or Russia, believes Assad used chemical weapons in Syria.

DavCrav

Re: And it's all based on ALLEGATIONS!

Citation for you not being correct: this Reuters article, which says that he helped the FFM collect samples. Sounds like a bit player at best, and not part of the FFM team at all.

Unless we can add Reuters to your list of people who are getting basic facts wrong. As opposed to The Gray Zone, your references, founded by Max Blumenthal, who (acording to Wikipedia) regularly contributes to RT and Sputnik.

Not that the Russian government has any interest in fake news regarding Assad's chemical weapons, and certainly Russia has never been noted for planting such fake news around the place.

DavCrav

Re: And it's all based on ALLEGATIONS!

"he lead the team."

The FFM team seem to disagree.

DavCrav

Re: And it's all based on ALLEGATIONS!

"Swimming pools and water treatment plants, as well as hospitals, contain supplies of chlorine dioxide or chlorine gas used for disinfection."

This is true. How did a chlorine gas canister get halfway up a building though, if it started off in a swimming pool?

And, I don't know about Syria, but everywhere I know uses sodium hypochlorite in swimmijng pools, because, you know, chlorine gas is nasty.

DavCrav

Re: And it's all based on ALLEGATIONS!

Here's Bellingcat talking about your guy Henderson. Summary:

1) Henderson wasn't on the FFM team.

2) Everybody on the FFM team disagrees with him.

3) He's wrong on facts.

DavCrav

Re: And it's all based on ALLEGATIONS!

"And it's all based on ALLEGATIONS!"

With regards Syrian "gas attacks", they were gas attacks. There is copious evidence, from eyewitness reports, soil samples, human tissue samples, piles of dead bodies, etc., that it happened, and that Assad was responsible. Don't lump that in with the 'dodgy dossier'.

If you don't LARP, you'll cry: Armed fun police swoop to disarm knight-errant spotted patrolling Welsh parkland

DavCrav

Re: WTF ?!!

If the armour is any good, then surely the baton round's energy will deflect across the armour? In which case the felt impact will be not much different to the recoil from the gun (by conservation of momentum). That is, unless baton rounds use propellant to be recoil-less, I don't know. It would feel quite uncomfortable, but better than being shot with a bullet wearing a vest, for example.

Of course, this armour is just for show, so I guess it wouldn't be any good at actually working.

DavCrav

Re: WTF ?!!

"A few baton rounds tends to result in the guy with the knife dropping it"

This guy's wearing armour. If it works properly, surely baton rounds wouldn't be much...welll...cop?

Total Eclipse to depart: Open-source software foundation is hopping the pond to Europe

DavCrav

Re: A long time coming

Advertising. I guess it's spelled advertise rather than advertize because it doesn't come from the Greek -izo ending (-ιζω), but from old French advertiss. But IANAL (I am not a linguist).

Users of Will.i.am's Wink IoT hub ask 'Where is the love?' as they're asked to pay for a new subscription service

DavCrav

Re: Let's start a new fad

"and to always, ALWAYS put it back in its "proper" place so it can always be found."

Maybe on the wall? And somewhere easy to reach, say by the door?

DavCrav

Re: This is why...

"I had a George Formby Grill.

Turned out nice again, that did."

Terrible at grilling, but the windows are nice and clean.

Penny smart and dollar stupid: IT jobs slashed in US, UK, Europe to cut costs – just when we need staff the most

DavCrav

Re: It's not all bad.

"I'm guessing the secretary would disagree with your point of view."

She is probably thinking 'I'm vulnerable to the virus, so I have to stay home, but hey, at least I'm still being paid 80% [maybe 100% if topped up] of salary'. So not all bad.

DavCrav

Re: tldr

"How does anyone realistically expect that won't result in fewer IT staff?"

If you want your remote company to work, you need IT. It's pretty much the only workers you need in such a company. Cutting down on essential staff (rather than 'essential' staff like management) is a bad idea for the viability of your company, even in the short/medium term.

DavCrav

"I do question whether it's fair to count furloughed staff in these figures though"

True, but given that the massive IT requirements are now, furloughing is as good as firing for the purposes of the article.

As Brit cyber-spies drop 'whitelist' and 'blacklist', tech boss says: If you’re thinking about getting in touch saying this is political correctness gone mad, don’t bother

DavCrav

So every connector looks like the yin yang symbol?