Where do I sign up?
I hear all the rhetoric about free speech and all, but seriously there is a limit, this is a money grabbing cult and I want to sign up to this campaign of destroying them
/me tottles off to a payphone to harass scientologists.
368 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jul 2006
given the enormous number of cock-ups EDS has managed to pull off in recent years the old adage "no-one ever got sacked for buying IBM" is even more pertinent here.
How many times have "cabinet reshuffles" happened due to EDS' complete incompetence with matters relating to IT?
So gov, if you're gonna impose ID cards, at least buy them from someone with a modicum of capability in delivering projects and a history of doing so, rather than the one who puts in the 15 grand bid with a "no questions asked" and a "you ain't seen me... right" clause, later to find that the questions get asked and the budget went up considerably as a result.
never give your credentials out to anyone who calls you... I have had a number of arguments with my bank (natwest) over them calling me, and asking me to "confirm" my birthdate, address, and ACCOUNT DETAILS! I don't have caller ID, I don't have it linked up to a database of genuine callers. Anyone, even my bank asking me details like that will get shouted at... I had an argument for nearly an hour with some mindless tart who couldn't understand that calling me up and asking me for my details was insecure.
I am part of a facebook group we call "Evil geniuses for a better tomorrow", we set this up as a larf, we added pics of sharks with frickin laser beams, atom bomb plans and various other odds and sods. Now here's the strange thing, we have an invisible member! Don't believe me, check the group out, there's always <visible members>+1 in the number of members list.
Who is this invisible member, I didn't even know you could do that with facebook, is this monitoring?
It really doesn't matter how many people tell them, traffic monitoring and DPI on this scale is impossible to achieve effectively they'll still keep rattling them sabres at us.
WRT: The dirty bomb, I only see one organisation spreading fear and terror with dirty bombs, and that would be the scare mongering .gov
So how to make a bomb in 3 easy steps:
1, Trundle down to your local library
2, Find the chemistry section
3, Read some old books which generally have some particularly detailed instructions for making things like composition B and RDX among other things. After all, the entire anarchists cookbook was compiled from a variety of library books and low level experimentation...
I expect after making this outrageous claim that LIBRARIES may have TERRORIST material in them we'll start burning books, also I remember my old chemistry teacher had a recipe or two for entertaining students. Those were the days :)
Its been shown in recent years especially that the government policy is influencing scientists research. For instance I heard of one research team that was investigating the decline in the mating habits of some rodent, they were denied funding until they tacked on "as a result of climate change".
The scientists will do whatever they can to get funding, the government have an agenda for climate change which has more to do with the energy crisis in terms of russias control of gas and the middle east control of oil than it has to do with the changing climate.
This is why a government of an insignificant CO2 contributer like the UK is pushing the climate change agenda to the public, and the public are lapping it up.
For the record, the only reason they want you to save energy is to try and prevent a third world war, it has nothing to do with the climate which is obviously changing.
Also the scientists who have done research which proves climate change is part of a longer cycle of earth changes and climate patterns have been brushed under the carpet, and those who entertain the governments "save the world" policy are getting increased funding.
I agree, the government needs to stop setting the scientific agenda and instead start listening to the facts which aren't skewed through the availability of research grants.
How can these people be called scientists?
As mentioned by David Greaves they could not quantify their results effectively, and the stats are questionable.
I'd like to see clear quantifiable evidence, where humans get it right 100% of the time (at this point the porcine flying league should be well into its 3rd year) as a benchmark.
They were talking about desktop search, not web search in firefox... With ubuntu you now use tracker, other linux's support tracker and beagle, the two are pretty interchangeable.
WRT Apple tying in these things... They don't!
Sure the email client uses webkit, and so does safari, you can remove safari and you still have webkit! If you remove IE, trident/mshtml is gone and windows craps out.
Desktop search via Spotlight on a mac isn't heavily integrated or tied in to other parts of the platform in ways that make it impossible to remove, whereas desktop search on vista I am led to believe is.
Its not about them "Bundling" their own apps, its about making it so the platform can't exist without them, its kinda like Xv vs DirectShow, directshow and WMP are heavily tied together, and without directshow you can't access video acceleration adequately, with Xv any app can use it, its part of the X11 API.
After they tie together apps, they then skew them off in a direction which makes it difficult if not impossible for a competitor to reach the same kind of feature parity. This is why microsoft are anti-competitive in software, they are also anti-competitive in business but that's a different matter entirely, and one far more difficult to prosecute without willing victims of microsofts underhanded tactics coming forward.
Surely in international waters, if someone you're boarding in a piracy style fashion decides to strap you to the mast there's pretty much bugger all you can do about it.
Even though I don't agree with whaling, I would have made them walk the plank, just for the laughs!
Piracy isn't what it used to be.
everyone's banging on about privacy but its OK for our government to GIVE this info to the US (as in its US against the world), without our prior written consent... In a country where we've already got people kicking up a fuss over the DNA database?
I'm with the virus writers idea, come on lads, put a stop to it! You used to fight for all that was free and just!
as a massive linux advocate I have to agree 100% here, there's no excuse for shoddy sys admin skills. Good firewalls, package updates and the regular round of sysadmin paranoia that someone is out to hack them are all good doses for us to take.
I've had countless old mambo installations hijacked by worms, running on linux, and apache. They are generally easy enough to remove because of the quarantine aspect of proper user separation (the apache user can't write to /bin). However this doesn't at all mean that the server wouldn't be trying to hijack other machines or visitors machines. The intrinsic security of Linux can only be broken by bad sys admins and all too regularly it is.
Hmm, even using a bilinear interpolation DVD's don't upscale well from 576 lines to 1080, its almost double the resolution! Of course, there are plenty of people out there who simply won't know the difference and will walk out of currys thinking all their DVDs are now HDDVDs...
I'm sure the sale of goods act will have something to say about this...
anyone who played Aliens vs. Predator will fondly remember the triumph to be had when playing a death match as the horrifically handicapped marine only to stumble across ALICE...
ALICE was a modified powerloader, equip with many handy tools to even out balance between the invisible predator or the nails aliens.
Microsoft's exclusivity deals with companies like dell you know the "satisfy demand by don't create demand" strategy is also illegal or at least questionable? And of course microsoft making incentives to schools to be microsoft only camps, and offering licenses almost free...
Broadcom should bugger off unless they can provide Linux drivers for all of their hardware, their wifi and some bluetooth products simply take the piss! They don't release tech specs and they won't release decent drivers.
For instance http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/
there's another misconception the hippies put out...
there is not enough actual land on the planet earth to create enough bioethanol to fuel all of the worlds cars, in fact there's probably enough land to fuel about 20% of existing cars, then you've got the problem of... WHERE DO WE GROW THE FOOD WE EAT!
That and don't forget that palm oil production creates more carbon waste than a coal power station... and we'd end up chopping down the entire rain forest to try and accommodate production.
Bloody hippies are constantly going on about Nuclear energy being bad, then they concede that renewables will possibly manage half of our energy needs by 2050. I'm sick of hippies killing the world with their moral high ground. Nuclear is bad is only one of their fallacious arguments here are some others that might amuse;
* The rainforests are the lungs of the earth man... No, they aren't, most of the oxygen on the planet is created by the Soylent in the oceans. Still protect the rainforest's because of the diversity of life, not their (inefficient) oxygen generation.
* Microgeneration is the way ahead man... No, it isn't, microgeneration cannot hope to create the amount of energy required to run a home, its a DIY store scam to get you to buy plasticy inefficient generation kit - however the microgeneration stuff they use in india is quite effective, necessity being the mother of invention and all.
* Climate change is our fault and we're killing the earth man... Climate change isn't at all our fault, if you look at a climate model which goes back hmm, I dunno, longer than the last few hundred years or so, you'll see that the earth is particularly cold at the minute compared to the average temperature over the last well, 100 million years or so. Climate change is only banded about at the minute because so many people are uninformed and scared, and yes the climate is changing... there's nothing we can do, once we hit tropical stability again it'll be OK for a while, then an ice age, then it'll be cold, then incremental rise to tropical again, ad infinitum or at least until the sun burns out or we nuke the planet.
These are idiot misconceptions perpetrated by the hippies at green peace so they can alleviate the guilt they have for whatever they did wrong as a kid, killing frogs or something?
I welcome nuclear, it means we burn less fossil fuels which is a good thing, not because of climate change but because of the non-renewable factor, and the cause of war factor. If we use nuclear to power fuel cells we're all better off.
Of course, the realistic hopes for our future are things like; http://www.iter.org/ and http://h2earth.com/ Not pissy little windmills that turn about once a week.
PS. Reg, can we have a smelly hippy picture? The closest I can get is steve jobs, but I don't think he smells... Actually get Richard Stallman, he smells (horrifically bad) and is a bit of a hippy!
"Elliott goes further, saying that significant amounts of renewables and nuclear cannot coexist on the same power grid, owing to "operational conflicts"."
So electricity from nuclear sources is incompatible with electricity from renewable sources... Strange that, I thought there was only one kind of electron.
According to the long count calendar the solar maxima happens in 2012... Which by pure co-incidence is the same year they believed the world would come to an end... again...
I will start selling Tin Foil hats on ebay, branded with "I told you we're all gonna die" written on them from 2011, unfortunately no pre-orders will be taken.
“During the next Digital Decade, technology will make our lives richer, more connected, more productive and more fulfilling in profound and exciting ways.”
- Still hasn't updated his speech since the start of the last digital decade then.
"Of course, Microsoft has been part-way there for years, with users well used to making hand (and even foot) gestures at kit running Microsoft software. It’s just that to date, the software has failed to respond appropriately."
- I actually knew of a machine with a dodgy power unit that actually rebooted when you, erm booted it :)
“(everyday computing) will be far more pervasive... multiple people sitting in front of a photo collection working together. It will be on the refrigerator. Just far easier to get to.”
- Still having trouble selling internet enabled fridges Bill? Obviously you don't know where my fridge is, and surely looking at a photo collection is far easier when sitting in the living room in front of the HD screen running Freevo than it could ever be on the blocking entry to the fridge, which contains food? not my ideal location for a slide show... Keep the internet out of my fridge Bill, this is your last warning!
If the education system put more emphasis on moral and social guidance of children than technology for the sake of technology (e.g. monitoring a childs education?!?!WTF!), the upshot factor of this would be;
A generally more respectful society
Better attendance to class
Better attentiveness in class
Etc...
The government did themselves a disservice by pulling 'God' from schools in every way other than studying the dogma of 'all' religions in 'Religious Education', the whole Christianity thing is a cheap and effective way of teaching morality to children (I still don't agree with a huge amount of it but hey! its cheap!)... Now they're combating the upshot of pulling God with the ASBO and spending a lot of money on pointless technology projects which are intended to provide a more inclusive classroom?
Go back to the drawing board guv, and try and come up with an educational plan which doesn't make teenage boys compete at who is the most stupid!
I hope;
* America looses the international domination of technology they've had in recent years as a result of the coming economic depression
* The UK actually starts to invest in science & technology rather than just talking about it
I suspect that;
* America will prop up their economy with more wars led by economic and materialistic needs
* Microsoft will push the release dates back of their service packs and still release them before they're ready for market
* Apple's desktop share will increase
* Linux desktop share will increase
* Microsoft's market share on desktop OS's will decrease
* Someone will invite ballmer to an empty conference room full of neat rows of chairs and announce to him the bad news that microsoft is no longer on top followed by "The furniture is already paid for, knock yourself out"
"Readers and scanners for two-dimensional barcodes were still comparatively expensive"
My phone does it (n95)! It ain't difficult to do this with a cheap digital camera and a little knowledge about how barcodes work!
People shouldn't give these things implicit trust... Regardless of the imaginary barriers.
I don't think the term security through diversity is some commenter's suggest is intended to make it impossible to break the network. Its more like the way the internet was designed. ARPAnet was originally created so that taking down one node wouldn't bring down the network, of course back in the day they were concerned with nuclear attacks and not viruses and exploits.
Now, taking down one windows machine with a well crafted virus can bring down most of the network. So diversifying the stock prevents a technological potato famine. Largely homogeneous crops suffer at the strike of a single virus, heterogeneous crops will allow some to survive. Basically security through diversity brings survival of the fittest into play, which of course will probably end up in a largely homogeneous crop of machines in the long run, but those machines would hopefully (because of the evolutionary nature of software) be far more secure, the benefit of this is two fold, MS will have to improve their security or die, and software will generally become more and more secure as time goes on. This will of course benefit us all as the necessary fixes need to come from the corporations who develop the software.
Everybody loves wii! Nintendo have captured a market that went unnoticed by the other contenders, and that's the everybody games console. Old (>50 as opposed to the OLD > 25 in previous years) and young people love wii, they love the kind of games you get with it like wii fit, sports and brain academy and many other titles which aren't aimed squarely at the point and shoot market... (My personal fav, is the best game ever, mario galaxy, its for 3+ but entertaining for all!)
Xbox 360 is a microsoft product, so I hope they do sell a lot of them... because they make a loss on every one of them sold :) With the Xbox 360s non-play issues such as the ring of fire bug and the halo 3 fiasco that coupled with the tendency of xbox's to just simply explode in a ball of flames/sparks/whatever else is being reported. Consumer confidence in the product will go down sharply over the coming year.
The wii will get the majority market share by opening up to new customers. PS3 will satisfy the hard core gamers and those who want the ability to play bluray as well as games without having multiple devices.
Sony and Nintendo both have their core markets mapped out, but since the original xbox I'm yet to see a real attempt to spot a real segment of the gaming market and develop their products in that direction. Seems like Microsoft are still monkeys at the cookie jar feeling hungry.