Never ever...
Never ever give your bank account details to a mobile phone company. That's just to dangerous.
4851 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Mar 2007
My wish would be to have a simple way of making meshed networks and to join them. For example when you get to a network of the Freifunk movement, it should just tell you that you can join it, and automatically set itself up to do so.
Another idea would be to have an option to "be public" which would automatically try to find other "public" computers in the network. You could then copy files to them, for example via drag and drop. Or you could start applications "publically" for example via VNC or something.
The "getting it done" people either have Windows because it came with their computer, or use Linux as it's cheaper and works more reliable. (except for KDE of course)
Apple product are bought by people who have no problem patching a firmware image, or finding buffer overflows in the baseband chip, because that's what you need to do to get things done on those devices.
Microsoft has such phases . Remimber the very early 1990s when they promised to be compatible with everyone with their new product "Windows-NT"? They even designed features into it's NTFS which only Mac network clients could benefit from.
In the end, they might release some software which would be incredible usefull if they fixed a few easy to fix bugs and abandon them.
In the end Microsoft will not have learned anything. Their whole business model is currently based on offering what many people percieve to be the best WINE out there. Their current OS product only sells because they ship it with a copy of the product people actually want.
Imagine a world where you would have meshed networks and everybody would have wires or radio links running to their neighbours and maybe the occasional central location. An event like this might have slowed the network down, but it certainly would have continued to work.
Well we like our equipment to be as good as possible. And good shielded cables are a good idea in general. I don't think the RFI compliance requirements are stricter than anywhere else.
Cable operators use 75 ohm coaxial cable. This is of course shielded as any such cable is. However cables are old and rot. Many installations have been made by incompetent people. This probably got a lot worse with privatisation of the company.
German cable companies are evil. They usually don't take any responsibility. In most cases, if you have a technical problem, they either tell you to "go to your landlord" or they just stop talking to you.
At least the largest one of them works on old equipment which is slowly crumbling appart. It's not unusual that whenever there is a light rain shower at the downlink station, the picture goes away, beeing replaced by a nice FUBK test-pattern labelled "Deutsche Bundespost". (that's the pre 1995 name of the cable operator back then) I've seen cases where there was constant FM-sparks in certain easy to recieve television stations for months, but they just didn't bother to fix their equipment.
Now this is at least a small victory for the consumer. A court has decided that the cable operators need to maintain their networks.
should be forced to watch only German television for a month.
Our commercial stations are like reality shows on BBC three, only done horrifyingly badly. They are not designed to show something remotely related to reality like on your channels, but instead only meant to humiliate the participants.
And public stations are only mildly better.
They take this seriously:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gETNrS_yd7s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2Xfw2NKYUY
This has _nothing_ to do with traditional bavarian music. This is just a brainless obscenity. It's not even provoking.
Of course there are rare events when even German TV is good. One example is Ijon Tichy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgDJCsSJDwQ
Or the German knock-off of "The Office", "Stromberg"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q63PrEyk5zw
So let's try to be a bit more clever than random stuff. Next time there is an 'interesting' cosmic event, let's send out a long message to the opposite direction. Now if there is (or will be) a civilisation in that direction, it will look towards us. It'll see the event, and then when it dims down, see our message. When the message arrives we will probably have died out a long time ago, but the others will have gotten a message from us, telling them that they are not alone.
If the boxes have an open standard you can use with any software it'll be a success. If it's yet another proprietary solution which can only be used with it's own software.
If it's an open standard you can suddenly use it for application servers which makes way more sense than having virtual desktops on a server.
Actually the only way this could work is by giving the network into the hands of the users. For example via meshed networks. Otherwise nobody would be stupid enough to pay twice for their connectivity.
Anyhow the hardware will be popular among people who want to spoof their own network.
Now the next thing would be to implement a "Please Cache" header in IPv6 which tells routers to please try to cache the connection, if they can.
Then, If I was Google, I would design and build lots of small routers with built-in harddisks which then simply cache every http request which has the "Please Cache" header in it's packets. The router would then have wireless and wired interfaces. Maybe Google would even pay you a bit of money for the traffic you route and the traffic you cache to motivate you to connect your router.
This would mean a lot lower traffic and power costs for google as much of the content distribution would then be done in the network itself. And if done right, the whole net could profit from that.
The main problem most people don't get is that those 100 GHz is probably meant for small signals. Essentially you amplify some DC signal and add a bit of high frequency signal. This is how it's done in analogue electronics. And in fact there 12 GHz is already _cheap_ as you can see at 3 Euro LNCs for direct broadcast satellite reception.
In digital applications you usually want to switch a transistor all the way. If you don't do that in CMOS you will essentially short circuit your power supply and your chip will blow up. This did happen in some early CMOS designs.
There is actually one digital technology which aims to use the speeding benefits of analogue circuits is ECL Emitter-coupled logic. Those circuits can easily reach the multi gigahertz range, however a simple gate can take several milliwatts of power. They are usually used as dividers for frequency counters.
Actually for amplifiers you typicall give the Gain Bandwidth product, which is about the frequency you reach amplification of 1. For "boxed" amplifiers where you do have the 3dB frequency. It's 3dB lower than the normal signal amplification. This would still be OK for digital circuits.
C++ is surely better than PHP, but the number of people actually fully knowing the language is about double digit. C++ is just a moving target which takes 4 years to master and changes completely every 4 years.
I would have rewritten it in a language like object orientated Pascal. It's compiled, but features functions like rangechecks. I have tried it on numerical applications and haven't been able to measure any significant loss in speed.
DAB in the UK was a great success. There are _millions_ of receivers in your country. You can see DAB receivers in your soap operas. You probably have seen DAB radios in stores, maybe even in other peoples homes. People know about it.
I am a geek, I have studied electronics with a focus on information technology. So far I have only seen 3 DAB radios in real life. One in a laboratory, one in a museum, and the last one in a transmitter building of the regional broadcaster.
You might question if a digitalisation rate of 50% are right or not. Here even 0.1% seems overly optimistic.
In Germany the radio solution for audiophiles certainly is DVB-S, or radio over the infrastructure for digital television. All public music stations are availiable in 320kbit MP2, while some stations even broadcast in Dolby Digital.
h.264 is the format they currently have all of their videos in. Do you seriously think they will reencode that all just for a test?
Of course we need to take a stand that we don't want H.264, but it's very understandably that they haven't yet switched to Ogg Theora. Even if they wanted to, the switch would still take weeks.
I mean what you need to do 3D is for example pixels in different colours. You can either use that for the gimmick of colour television or stereoscopic 3D, as recently demonstrated by Channel 4.
I don't see the point of getting a new TV which uses polarisation or time to differenciate both pictures. After all that will start working, without glasses, once Phase 3 has arived.
At least they have experience with checking if their boxes still work so they can restart them. :)
On the other hand, maybe you should get your routers from a company which doesn't think it has to implement the 90% crap of the standard, just to get it wrong.
Unfortunately there's nearly no competition in the broadband market. In most places you cannot choose between several providers.
If customers could choose, they would gravitate towards open networks, but unfortunately they cannot. It's not an open market.
Now Comcast has a simple problem. They are providing internet via "broadband" cable. This is, unfortunately a technological dead-end, as all users need to share their bandwidth. So unlike DSL providers where they only need to rent another pair of fibers from the DSLAM, the cable network needs to be upgraded by beeing split into smaller networks. This is _really_ expensive.