Maggie undid the damage ?
No she fucking didn't. She did the damage. She threw the baby(s) out with the bathwater. As well as bringing in new licences, which already existed anyway, she removed all rent controls, decimated social housing, threw out the "sitting tenant" class of tenancy etc etc.
I rented from 1980 onwards & I've never owned a house, so I'm in a fairly good position to judge the state of the rental market. I had no problem at all renting during the 80's. Thatchlers rent fiasco passed in 1988. Rents immediately rose quickly. There was never a problem with tenants having "too many rights" - the Tories perceived there was a problem with their landlord mates not being able to charge what they liked & kick people out of their homes(yes it is the tenants *home* you know) when they liked, so they "de-regulated" the rental sector. According to your logic, a lot more people are landlords now, so rents should be driven down as there should be a glut - Wrong.
There was nothing wrong with the "Fair rent" idea - it was administered correctly & was fair to both sides. Also any landlord could rent a property using a licence agreement which lasted 6 months, which was very common. All the scare stories were bollocks. I'm lucky enough now to share a flat which was originally rented before '88 so is *still* subject to the Rent Act, so there's a limit on the % rise the landlord can add on every year. The landlord owns a few million quid houses outright though, so he's laughing anyway(like so many landlords who've inherited their little goldmine).
You seem to be talking sense about things you've actually experienced - then you went & spoiled it by coming over all political. I love the way you take pride in your hypocrisy about "the GW industry" & "I'm just taking advantage".