I didn't realise Geller was still a thing.
I can only assume he is lacking attention at the moment.
6754 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Oct 2007
I was not that impressed with the Mate site, they seemed more interested in obtaining my details than giving any real info about the gadget, including the price.
In my experience having at one time been a person with purchasing power for a large organisation, any sales wonk who won't give you an up front price, (even as a guide should discounts apply if you buy more) is usually trying to screw you.
Which brings me to the name. one letter away from a well known brand of condoms, ironic considering the 'appliance' aids in shoulder action but nothing for the wrist.
I must say I am a little disappointed at not receiving modern man type catalogues as someone close to 70, maybe it's because I never share my details including my address.
As far as walking sticks go, I have been making and selling rustic sticks for decades, fortunately, they are not a necessity for walking but handy for balance when strolling in the local mountains.
I think Modi sees himself as the Trump of Asia, tryig to make India Great.While it may have the potential and population, India has a long way to go before it is a significant rival to China.
Taking back control of agriculture and improving drug manufacturing standards may be more useful than denying apps that provide platforms for Indian sellers.
Of your bandwidth by neighbours, this looks like a potential backdoor/front door and open windows to bad actors, whether official or otherwise.
What kind of security does this offer?
Though I can't say I am worried personally, as I have no neighbours close enough to be a threat and neither do I own any Amazon or other IoT tat.
"We spent 25 years trying"
No we didn't! Only Maggie made a decent effort with Europe and she didn't go far enough or, it seems to me to have overly much interest in Europe, she was more interested in playing monetarism with Reagan and flogging off council houses or industries.
No other UK governments did much more than bleat and whinge, none of our leaders either left or right had any balls or a clue when it came to dealing with Europe, all they did was piss off former commonwealth members while complaining about the iniquities of Europe.
That social interaction stimulates the pleasure centres of a social animal's brain.
While it is nice to have scientific corroboration, sometimes it exasperates me when scientists state the bleedin' obvious as if it were a new discovery. Without a social drive there would be no civilisation or the level of technology that we have.
Presumably Oxford Languages have liittle to do, so cataloguing the latest fleeting linguistic fashions and buzzwords is how they attempt relevance.
I am quite surprised that ' new normal' and 'great reset' were not included given their prevalence in various media.
The 'Great Reset™' seems to be occupying the thoughts of many who think they know better what our collective futures and economies ought to be. Considering how well they have run things up to now, I won't be holding my breath while waiting for the New Improved Normal™.
They usually are but if they start coming out onto the beaches, I may have to think twice about sunbathing.
I am curious as to the area that a drone can survey though, the ocean is quite big and in spite of all those who want to catch and kill or eat sharks, there are quite a lot of them.
In my opinion a software 'fix' and pilot training, no matter how much, are not sufficient to address a design failure that is the result of deliberate corner cutting. Calling it the Max is fitting as you could hardly cut a bigger corner by modifying an old airframe with newer, more modern and efficient engines rather than designing a new model that would not only compete with the Airbus but possibly better it by a significant margin.
Shortsighted corporate policy that resulted in deaths.
@Steve Davies 3
You are absolutely right, with Airbus A380 threatening a major part of US industry such as Boeing, Airbus is a threat to national security.
I don't fly much nowadays but I think I will avoid anything Boeing as studiously as I avoid flying Ryanair.
I am also rather pleased due to the fact that my house is under a major crossing of European air corridors, and I have almost got 2500 square metres of garden straight.
I remember reading articles in New Scientist in the school library in the sixties as they were commissioning Arecibo and beginning to make discoveries, at that time it was an incredible piece of engineering and really that hasn't changed, it would be a terrible shame for science and for Puerto Rico if the site is demolished without any plan to rebuild.
The design fault in this case was deliberately accepted as a measure to be able to compete economically with Airbus, nothing to do with honest mistakes or unkowns in design, it was solely about money.
I class the entire issue as criminal on the part of both the FAA and Boeing
The bigger picture would have to include an aircraft that was sufficiently well manufactured that it wouldn't put smaller third world airlines in that position in the first place.
It is not acceptable that a fully certified aircraft can produce a ' stick shaker' that needs specific software and training to deal with.
It stinks of shortcuts and collusion between Boeing and the FAA.
An innately unstable aircraft that relies on a combination of software, new training and minimal material changes to stay in the air for hours at a time, that carries hundreds of passengers and flies over population centres, is not a viable proposition.
Ungrounding is an interesting use of English, ' Fasten your safety belts and prepare for ungrounding'.
It's a question of turf.
If apps and extensions are slurping and selling data from users, that is encroaching on Google's sales,
So by forcing Dev's to be clear about slurping and preventing them from selling or sharing your data with third parties they are limiting competition.
Not as cuddly as they would like you to think.
Only time will tell what Trump tactics will be undone by Biden's administration. For all we know, lobbyists and others may pressure him into maintaining the toxic trade tactics of Trump.
If the next administration does badly, don't forget that Orange Boy is threatening to run again in '24.
Biden was VP when the sanctions against Russia started, among others so in some respects Donny was picking up where they left off.
I find a nice irony in the fact that the biggest suckers to buy a product as a result of advertising hype, are advertisers themselves.
I doubt that targetted ads are ultimately any better than good advertising in general, the companies who benefit most from targetted advertising are those who sell it.
You would get a similar reaction in the UK but it would be tea not coffee, if you are really lucky you might get a crime number for 'stuff'.
Given the high ratio of cams:people in the UK I suspect it would doable there too. If it isn't already.
As a side note, Telegram is used all over the world, is owned by two Russian brothers who live in Switzerland, so is not strictly a Russian message service. The Russian government is apparently not that happy with it because of encryption and the lack of rear entry.
I am trying to imagine how it's possible to fit the thing by using wood screws to attach the bracket and then try to get the mounting screws to bite into a door frame.
I assume the wood screws are too long and penetrate the casing and battery but in any case it seems like a design fail combined with the application of Darwinism.
The statement from Ericsson implies that they don't believe they are sufficiently competitive with Huawei to beat them in the market place.
If they are more expensive, one would hope the product quality would reflect that, basing your success in the market on political whims or manoeuvres is not a sound business plan.