Re: Who gives a rat's scrotum..
I think the Norwegian case was about security implications of using newangled tech. Perhaps I just over analyzed and it really was just teen celeb gossip.
752 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Oct 2007
I'm pretty sure *DSL routers from Zyxel et al have included stateful firewalls for years. Netfiliter is built into the Linux kernel and it's just a matter of building a web GUI. I distinctly remember setting up port forwarding on one of those, and it involved (a) setting up DNAT and (b) opening the firewall from the Internet to the internal host.
Nuff said. Oracle the archetypical enterprise software vendor, in the worst possible meaning. Expensive, crap, evil. Google still retains a thin veneer of hipness, but the real corporate agenda (money and power) shines through.
And speaking of Google shills, paging Bob Vistakin. I summon you in the name of The Blue Smoke, the bringer of life to all that is LAN and WAN.
I don't know if it's the place you live or just the girls you know / spoke to, but I know lots of girls who have gone into business, law, international politics, medicine, natural sciences and engineering. But none have gone into IT.
Really, it goes way down to the young age where you buy a barbie for your daughter and legos for your son.
I'm a male and I won't apply if I don't meet all the listed criteria. I don't understand why have a list of requirements if you then accept applicants that only meet half of them. Failing to get any applicants that do meet them, you're left with people who think half is good enough.
Alien because I must be one.
I foresee a (dual boot? Live CD/USB?) "Steam Linux" on the horizon. Basically yet another Linux appliance. We already have Linux appliances doing NAS, firewall, routing, VOIP, SMB server etc.
While Microsoft and Apple and scrambling to push their application stores on their respective operating systems, Steam might be the application store that comes with its own streamlined and customized OS. You won't even know it's Linux.
Remember how there were magazine cover CDs that booted to play Quake III? Add local storage for downloaded games and a UnionFS/AUFS layer for the odd OS update/config and that's it.
If I enable GPS on my Android handset it asks if I want to allow it to send anonymized location information to Larry and Sergey, at my frikking expense. I decline, and GPS goes off again. No, they cannot have my information, even if it's "anonymized". No, I will not pay for them to get it. I'm so looking forward to getting rid of my CIAndroid snoop phone. Until then it's no GPS.
/tinfoil hat off
Oh, the evil Google story.
http://tales-of-the-sausage-factory.wetmachine.com/mr-shermans-magical-thinking/
The problem with ACTA is that Hollywood hijacked what was a well intentioned treaty, and has become a solution totally out of proportion with the problem.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/op-ed-eus-rejection-of-acta-subtly-changed-trade-law-landscape/
If China is not playing game with IP, why is the solution to push for criminal charges against every young person downloading an MP3 in the US and Europe? You know, the same people that also spend the most money on buying music and movies? How about tackling the really important counterfeiting and technology theft instead?
http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-business/china-denies-technology-theft-20100729-10x81.html
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/how-us-software-ended-up-in-chinese-assault-helicopters/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/12382747
So you looked a one random location. How about http://n9-apps.com/ or http://store.ovi.com/applications#/applications/?terminalId=N9 or any of the Apt repositories you can use with your MeeGo device.
If the new company can turn a profit, that's all that matters. It just needs to find a niche, not to aim for the top 3. There are plenty of people wanting a proper open source mobile device, not an Apple walled garden or a Google ad trojan.
You don't say? The RBS arse-covering back-stabbing brown-nosing article on office politics is to turn anyone from from IT - at least in a corporate environment. Or maybe females would actually enjoy the excitement of that kind of soap opera...
Ahem, chill pill needed by others too.
1) "Only in USA" is not the same as "All Americans". While being an important center of cultural and scientific progress, it's also the promised land of extreme nutjobs and bigots.
2) You can't deny the US has a recent history of security hysteria, Americans themselves being its biggest critics. Do I need to point you to "Security Theater", tazings, flight blacklists etc. ad nauseam?
You didn't read/listen did you? Nvidia want to sell chips to Android manufacturers. Which kernel does Android use again?
Linux is used everywhere from TVs to phones, Hollywood renderfarms and GPU-based supercomputing. Nvidia drivers are needed by others than Linux desktop gamers, wake up.
*head explodes*
So you actually care, perhaps a lot?
Think about what you're saying. Native speakers' grasp of English is frankly appalling. Perhaps we non natives should send drones to US skies to shoot Hellfire missiles at those committing crimes against the English language. It would only be fair, and probably more fruitful than current US war efforts are.
Must get more coffee.
There's bias and there's blatant lies.
Lewis' subheading: 'Abandon focus on sound science', say trick-cyclists
Lewis "paraphrasing" the article: Thus it is, according to the assembled profs, that the US government should seek to fund a communication strategy on climate change which is not focused on sound scientific information.
What the Nature article says, but redacted by Lewis with ".."s: communicators should endeavor to create a deliberative climate in which accepting the best available science does not threaten any group’s values.
So they actually advocate best available science, not abandoning focus on sound science. What's Lewis' point again?
Except that's not what the article says. That's what Lewis Page tells you.
The article says *only* focusing on making science communication clearer will not persuade anyone of the risks climate change, because people's world views weigh more than the scientific evidence.
Ironically Lewis' article is a perfect example of this. He chooses to interpret the article in his own manner, and I really suggest you pay attention to the parts he has redacted with ".."s:
"communicators should endeavor to create a deliberative climate in which accepting the best available science does not threaten any group’s values."
Proof the article does *not* advocate not focusing on sound science. It advocates presenting the "best available science" but in a value neutral manner.
1) Please look at figure 2 in the original Nature article.
2) Please look at figure S1 in the supplementary PDF
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/extref/nclimate1547-s1.pdf
Now, maybe you'll agree Lewis' headline should have been "The more science you know, the less worried you are about climate ... if you're an NRA member".
So the main finding of the paper is that political orientation is actually a bigger factor in determining your view on climate change than education. Even educated people have a tendency to read scientific papers through tinted glasses, and pick out those parts that support their own *pre-conceived ideas*. Who would have thunk? Perhaps even El Reg hacks have a tendency to do just that.
The raw pixels are used to create a sharper, "normal" resolution image using a proprietary processing algorithm.
- the output is not 41MP
- the sensor is HUGE, so it's not just an excercise in shrinking pixels
- the lens is very high quality (and F2.4), not your average phone lens
- it has a separate processor for images
- Microsoft has tight hardware specs on WinPho, so it cannot used with specialized hardware like this
Dodging taxes is only insulting to middle class Americans, as those are the only ones paying them. Poor don't earn so they don't pay. The rich dodge their taxes using other methods.
See: "Mitt Romney Tax Returns Released: Paid Just 13.9% Rate In 2010, Had Swiss Bank Account"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/24/mitt-romney-tax-returns-released_n_1225247.html
Tell me why my phone has to have more cores and more MHz. Windows phone uses GPU acceleration, so it cannot be for the UI or graphics in general. For the browser? Games are the only application I can think of that could demand a more CPU performance at the moment. Perhaps you can point to me why my "outdated" (2011 Android) phone needs a faster CPU.
I can only conclude that people have carried the cores-and-MHz meme from the desktop world into the mobile world, where it only applies tenuously. In fact, with Atom and ARM making inroads into the desktop world, "good enough" is starting to apply there as well.
Here's waiting for fridge and toaster epeen competitions to start.