"readers will be shocked to find that only the Scots rated price as more important"
Shocked????? Surely that's the understatement of the millennium!
835 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Oct 2007
Since you like SuperMicro, I suggest:
http://www.supermicro.nl/products/accessories/mobilerack/CSE-M28E2.cfm
If you don't need the dual-port capability, the basic model is:
http://www.supermicro.nl/products/accessories/mobilerack/CSE-M28E1.cfm
4 bay version:
http://www.supermicro.nl/products/accessories/mobilerack/CSE-M14.cfm
(don't ask me why supermicro.com redirects me to .nl!)
Budget range:
http://intrl.startech.com/HDD/Mobile-Racks?filter_DRIVESIZE=2.5in&page=all
If this stuff is much finer than copper wires, what might that mean for motors, and electromagnets (and other "mundane" electrical based stuff)? Could it mean maglev technology (for example) suddenly becomes viable without requiring room temperature superconductors?
Never mind in Spain, I have solar panels here in good ole' Blighty, albeit only 1.1kW peak (that being as much as they thought they could safely fit on the south facing portion of my roof), and for much of last year, could gloriously watch as my main electricity meter span backwards during the day*. And I have a server, a PC and a laptop on 24x7 (along with assorted paraphernalia).
* except anytime I switched my 3kW kettle on :).
"I'm waiting for a laptop the screen just comes right off with a wireless link to the body which can thus still have a sensible spec."
Depending on whether the new Atoms are anything useful or not, and providing you are looking for a tablet(ish) sized screen, the HP Envy X2 might be an interesting option.
If I'm understanding the XMBC web site and wiki correctly, the production version of XBMC does not have any Live TV/PVR capabilities, so it's hardly a replacement for WMC today. It appears that such capabilities are imminent (if I'm understanding the description of the beta version that's WIP), but I don't "do" beta s/w on my main PC (if at all possible).
I'm going to be generous to TalkTalk (though I suspect I might regret it in terms of downvotes).
Bearing in mind that they have been formed by fairly aggressive acquisition (buying various former ISPs like Tiscali, Nildram et al), they have to have been exerting considerable effort to combine all these disparate operations, with concomitant knock-on effects (organisational change isn't easy-peasy!).
That there's a clear downward trend in their complain numbers suggests two possibilities: either they're getting their act together (as the integration efforts reach fruition), or they're bleeding customers heavily.
Personally, I wouldn't touch 'em with a hyper-extended bargepole, but I know some people who are very happy with them.
data.gov.uk is for publishing raw* data in machine-usable form (CSV, XML, that sort of thing) that others can consume. While the ONS site is a bunch of reports (logically, the ONS site should be built on results from data.gov.uk, but probably isn't).
* after sanitising & other "airbrushing" techniques have been applied, of course
"In fact, Brits like to shop online so much, they can't even stop themselves when they're out of the house. Over a fifth of UK smartphone users use their mobes to visit retailers online, the highest amount in Europe."
I suspect this would mostly be price checking while in the shops (ie making sure Currys et al aren't ripping us off as badly as they used to).
PS spend 1 hour in the naughty corner for lazily using "mobes".
How can it be illegal to change something that doesn't yet exist? It's only once they've filed their accounts that the historical data exists. And even then, it's not uncommon for prior years to be restated later (in light of either changes to accounting practice, or new evidence that comes to light [usually fraud related]).
Here's my userJS:
<pre>
// @include http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/*
function squashDiv(name) {
var tmpDiv = document.getElementById(name);
if ( tmpDiv ) { tmpDiv.outerHTML = '' };
}
window.addEventListener(
'load',
function () {
window.gloader=null;
squashDiv('geo-uk-digest');
squashDiv('programmes-promotion');
squashDiv('av-best');
squashDiv('sport');
squashDiv('democracy-live');
squashDiv('special-event-promotion-best-include');
squashDiv('correspondent-strapline');
}, false
);
</pre>
Possibly not as neat as just hiding the DIVs, but certainly effective.
"not too loaded with scripts."
That used to be the case, but is less and less true as time goes on.
These days, they seem to have lost that focus, and gone rather "widgetty" (distracting, IME). I've even resorted to writing some userJS for Opera to kill off the most annoying excesses (now, if I can just figure out how to kill their animated-images-that-aren't-animated mini-slideshow thing...)
"Australia's Federal Police (AFP) has triumphantly announced it has brought a gang of Romanian credit card fraudsters to heel, but not before they purloined half a million credit card numbers from small Australian retailers."
Why are the AFP purloining credit card numbers from small Australian retailers? Are they not getting by on the proceeds from selling impounded drugs?
I don't think I suggested it would necessarily be easy, but MPs collectively have the power to change tax law. Right now, all they're doing is bitching and moaning about companies doing what's best for their shareholders, when what they ought to be doing is working out how to close the loopholes (or if that's "too hard", start over with a fresh tax code).
Key phrase in your post is "at what looks like quite a high price". There should be no problem with making inter-group transactions (as you say, it would be odd that HP couldn't supply itself with kit), but any such transactions designed solely to move profit from one tax jurisdiction to another should be restricted to normal "market" rates (assuming the business would normally buy such) or even ignored entirely for taxable profit purposes.
Given it's shape, it's clearly designed for ninjas. You'll find that a user-definable keypress causes it to split in half revealing a set of shuriken inside, cunningly positioned between circuit boards so as to pass through airport security (they're visible, but not seen, IYSWIM).
A Scottish solder in full dress uniform marches into a chemist's. Very carefully he opens his sporran and pulls out a neatly folded cotton bandanna. He unfolds that, to reveal a smaller silk square handkerchief, which he also unfolds, to reveal a condom. The condom has a number of patches on it. The chemist holds it up and eyes it critically.
"How much to repair it?" the Scot asks the chemist.
"Six pence," replies the chemist.
"How much for a new one?"
"Ten pence," replies the chemist.
The Scot painstakingly folds the condom into the silk square handkerchief and the cotton bandanna, replaces it carefully in his sporran and marches out of the door, shoulders back and kilt swinging. A moment or two later the chemist hears a great shout outside, shortly followed by an even greater shout. The Scottish soldier marches back into the chemists and addresses the proprietor, this time with a grin on his face.
"The regiment has taken a vote," he announces. "We'll have a new one."
Or perhaps remove the "vat-free" element of purchases for use within the business. Yes, that should lower profitability of all businesses operating in the UK (thus lowering corp. tax take), but the more regular payment cycle and unavoidability advantages of VAT collection would probably compensate.