Daily Mail Reader Alert!
"what is needed is fixed, registered IPs for each and every user and an end too the free for all that internet cafe's and wireless access points provide."
Nothing to hide, nothing to fear eh ?
1184 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Oct 2007
"Clarke said "renegade" countries need to be pressured into acting on cyber-criminals through a process akin to the way in which countries who tolerated the laundering of drug profits through their banking system were brought into line."
Yeeees. Erm, just remind me, how's that whole war on drugs thing going again ?
I suppose there are now people around who've never seen a file infector before, it being a somewhat old timey type of attack. For executable files, .exe and .dll it the proverbial unit of wee wee, you just stick your code in there somewhere where it will get executed. There is a whole spectrum of sophistication of course, depending on weather you care if the infected executables will do what they did before you messed with them, but it's really not that difficult if you know your way around a PE file. This is by way of being almost the oldest trick in the book.
As for the HTML, think of it as a kind of offline XSS. If I can alter an HTML file on disk, I can insert code that will bugger off into the the intar webs and pull any old shite in. Which could include - as you say - a pwning iframe or other web based vuln de jour.
A bit like the outlook email virii that were popular in the mid 90s. Christ, I can't believe I'm getting nostalgic for security threats. Must be time to start drinking.
Lots of s00per s3Kr3t inph0s at :
http://blog.trendmicro.com/file-infector-uses-domain-generation-technique-like-downadconficker/
I think the Conficker guys should copy ZeuS and get some hot Russkie Jailbait on side. There's just not enough glamour in the organised cyber-crime world these days.
"Kristina Svechinskaya, 21, has been dubbed the ‘world’s sexiest computer hacker’ after being charged with being part of a gang aiming to steal $220million (£139million).
In leather boots and skin-tight jeans, she wept during her court appearance. Today, she is due in court again, charged with conspiracy to commit bank fraud and false use of passports."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1320184/Worlds-sexiest-hacker-appears-court-charged-35m-scam.html
I'd say "you couldn't make it up", but I've seen fan fic of it, so that would be wrong.
Paris. D'uh!
"The string IS PII in that it ""can be used to uniquely identify, contact, or locate a single person"
Is not the case, m'lord, that in fact the referral string can only be used by m'clients global meat tracking network to uniquely identify, contact, or locate a single 'face book ' page ?
You could try not putting it on the internet. Just a thought.
IANAL but I'm going to guess this fails, because if you read through the complaint, they explicitly say that in order to get all the juicy inphos, the advertiser would have to visit (or scrape) your FB page.
So in fact, technically, FB didn't share your PII, _you_ did. And if you had the privacy settings set correctly, any old Tom, Dick or Harriet wouldn't be able to get access to your PII, now would they ?
Not commenting viz the rights/wrongs.
Could it just be that everyone who wants one has already got one ? We constantly hear from the netbook fanatics that their current netbook does everything they will ever need - and more power to them if this is indeed true - so wouldn't we expect to see a natural falling off of sales to round about replacement levels at some point ?
"All external documents are to be saved as a PDF only"
Excellent, well said.
That should be mandatory IT policy everywhere , if you don't need to edit the document, you need the .doc (or whatever). If you do, you can all agree a format to use that enables collaboration.
The whole 'interoperability' thing has always been a massive red herring.
Obviously, this is going to vary a lot from industry to industry and shop to shop, depending on what the staff actually do each day, but it has been my experience that after a while everyone develops their own unique set of tricks, key shortcuts, macros, etc that become as natural to them as breathing.
And they don't like it when you change them, because they've got jobs to be getting on with.*
This is not to bash OOo, the same would apply switching the other way.
*I realise that I am in a minority of commentards when it comes to this, but I personally do give a shit what users think, and if they're unhappy, you're probably doing it wrong.
"However some of the statements are correct; people familiar with Office will need some retraining, translation of Macros will require work; anyone changing any product will know that the cost is not limited to the licences."
Sadly, some shops end up lumbered with a "swap it all to FOSS and fuck the haters" person at a strategic position in their tech hierarchy who is wilfully ignorant of this, or a beancounter in the money chain who is - wilfully or otherwise - ignorant of same. Or both, which is even worse.
And I think "some retraining" rather understates the case, to be honest. Productivity software is simply not fungible. Oddly enough the set of people who continue to insist that it is heavily intersects with the set of people who would happily chew their own hands off at the wrist rather than use a text editor other than vi. Go figure.
"For many, many organisations Office is so embedded that they will never look at alternatives; for others the upheaval will require a truly significant benefit (and licensing costs just don't cut it) which can be very hard to find."
I know that, you know that, but watch the bile that this comment generates. And despair.
"How about re-opening some of those super pits, of which some where profitable"
Couple of mines in Wales (Unity and one I don't recall the name of) have been re-opened, and there are (or were) plans to re open others around and about the place.
It's only in the last few years that it has become economical to do so as the price of coal has risen, and the cost of the technology required to un-mothball pits has fallen.
"What happened to pushing see water down there to force up the oil."
.. because it might reduce sea levels*, and is therefore raping Gaia. All technological methods to combat climate change are evil, because that way we don't have to repent for our sins, see ?
This is considered quite nifty thinking in some circles.
*just a tiiiny amount.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100825174102.htm
"Cooper and co-workers found that dry water absorbed over three times as much carbon dioxide as ordinary, uncombined water and silica in the same space of time. This ability to absorb large amounts of carbon dioxide gas as a hydrate could make it useful in helping to reduce global warming, the scientists suggested."
Methane also. Nifty.
As for the whole plan, it will never happen if it has to be done by government fiat, because no matter how carbon neutral it is, it still involves the words 'oil' and 'consumption' and is therefore raping Gaia. And therefore hysterical baying mobs of Guardianistas will gather and demand the death penalty for all who support it, irrespective of any real world benefits it might have.
"I mean at the time we all still had coal fires in our homes "
Maybe not all, but certainly quite a lot of people did, in fact, still have coal fires in their houses.
Notably those living in council houses in mining villages, tis true. And miners of course, who got free/subsidised coal. I well remember the NCB lorry coming around the estates to fill the bunkers. Ah, the nostalgia.
Just sayin'
Scargill and his ill considered attempt to bring down the government of the day by means other than democracy. That's who closed the fucking mines.
I don't have much love for old Maggie, to my mind she was the embodiment of the horrible pseudo Victorian morality and creeping authoritarianism of middle England. She had a lot of time for Mary Whitehouse*, for instance.
But I'm afraid that the closure of the mines and various assorted industrial wastage can't be blamed on her. And lest we forget, she won three elections, so let's not pretend that was universally unpopular.
*I knew MW when she was alive, she was a complete bitch, and she absolutely fucking hated children. True.
"Well guess what, it's based on Linux..."
The sound you are about to hear is the fail buzzer. OS X is based on a grab bag of UNIX-ey technologies, Mach, OpenStep, various flavours of BSD, none of which are - or have ever been - Linux.
Probably feell like hiding under that rock you mentioned now, eh ?
http://www.langner.com/en/
"Fact: Stuxnet intercepts code from Simatic Manager that is loaded to the PLC. Based on a conditional check, original code for OB 35 is manipulated during the transmission. If the condition matches, Stuxnet injects Step7 code into OB 35 that is executed on the PLC every time that OB 35 is called. OB 35 is the 100 ms timer in the S7 operating environment. The Step7 code that Stuxnet injects calls FC 1874. Depending on the return code of FC 1874, original code is either called or skipped. The return code for this condition is DEADF007 (see code snipplet)."
Are we learning yet ?
"This lack of support is on purpose, because Microsoft sees HTML 5 as a natural enemy to Silverlight and a threat to Windows in general."
Yes, that's right, HTML 5 will destroy windows with it's bitchin' hardware support and it's ability to multi-task native apps.
Step /away/ from the sharp things.
"My experiences with previous versions were so terrible that there is nothing that Microsoft could do to tempt me back and I would be very surprised if any material number of people felt differently to me."
... for a bit of a shock, because plenty of people have never even seen a WinMo phone, and will have no difficulty approaching a WinPho handset.
"it's over-consumption in the developed world."
No, it's the 'pollution' generated by the manufacturing process. Not the consumption itself.
And BTW I think China probably uses some of it's electricity to see in the dark and stuff, so only a portion of the emissions would fall undet the banner of the 'ours by proxy' argument.
You aren't allowed to be sensible, you have to become all hysterical and shouty and adopt an extreme position. And then cling to it in the face of any inconvenient incompatibilities with reality.
This is apparently mandatory.
Unfortunately, since you haven't, you can now expect to be attacked by foaming idiots from either extreme. I still don't know why. If someone would forward me a copy of the minutes of the meeting where we decided those were the rules, I'd be most grateful. Tx.
Please go back to touching yourselves while looking at pictures of Monbiot and Milliband, and leave us alone to our pointless bickering about Microsoft.
PS yes, I know who you are. Apart from anything else, continuing to insinuate that anyone who disagrees with the point of view you have been spoon fed is a Telegraph reading Tory - as if there were something inherently wrong with either of those - is a dead give-away.
Will be exactly like Web 2.0, but you will have to pay for it.
Because 3.0 is all about 'monetization', and eventually someone is going to be sitting in a meeting and say "y'know, we could just ask users to pay for our shit" and after the commotion has died down, someone is going to run the numbers.
... only because there are so many people who still don't understand the nature of the relationship that they are entering into with the providers of "free" internet services.
In any other sphere, Facebook - to take just one example - would fail the smell test: if something seems to good to be true, then it probably is.
Facebook is way to good to be true, that's one h'll of a service for free. And of course it isn't, but because people have the expectation that everything on the Internet should be free, they fail to apply the same scrutiny.
It's really that expectation that's the problem. Funny really, since it only came about due to the time lag between the internet going mainstream and someone figuring out how to get money off people over it. In that gap - and it wasn't even a long gap - the seeds of 'the new economy' (remember that issue of Wired ?) were sown.
And only now are they truly bearing fruit.