Slow news day?
"Bloke shoots mouth off while pissed as a fart. Apologises next day."
Other news: None.
9435 publicly visible posts • joined 5 Oct 2007
More like:
The bloke next door is an amateur chef, a good mate, makes fish soup and you sell his fish soup on your menu. Some of your customers get sick as dogs, as his kitchen is actually an unlicensed, roach infested hellhole. The soup is identified as the most likely culprit and you are advised to stop selling it.
You decide that you don't want to upset your mate and would rather carry on giving your customers the shits, 'cos you don't give a toss about them.
Then you act all surprised when someone writes a letter to the local rag about how they got gyppo tummy at your restaurant, loads of people read it and your trade disappears overnight.....
Fully charge car. Use car. Look at charge gauge on returning home. Decide whether or not it needs topping up for the next day. You know, exactly the process you use now when you look at the fuel guage and go: "Aha. Must go to the petrol station tomorrow....".
The advantage here is that you know *everything* that you might be doing the following day and how much "spare" you'd like, rather than just the bits you've put in your diary and some generic algorithm's guesstimate.
Of course, there's no home for an Intel tablet in that process, which is the real reason for this outpouring of total bullshit.
"...used password and user ID combinations from an unidentified third-party source..."
That doesn't sound like a bruteforce attack to me. That's a "wander right in using the same user/pwd combo that muppet-brain used on other site xyz" attack.
Maybe we need a snappy, single word name for that so Sony can use it in press releases come the next "Sony caught with knickers round ankles again" story?
I took one look and decided I'd rather have the bloody trojan.
Anything squirreling itself that far into the guts of the OS is asking for trouble come patch time IMHO. Also appears to lack that all important "load on request only" option, so that for the 99.99% of the time I'm *not* talking to a bank it's not loaded, not chewing resource in the background and not providing yet another reason for things to go titsup unexpectedly.
Worst part was that the bank punting this said I didn't have to have it, but once it had been seen in use once they'd never allow another connection without it. At least you can remove malware.....
Quite common actually.
A moped is quite a bit faster than a plod on foot, which is the only thing they have that can follow it down a footpath.
In a "catch me if you can" contest between the plod and a moped rider who knows the area, my money's on the moped every time.
All bets off if they get a chopper up in time.......
Hmm, the other day I was listening to a Canadian colleague and passport holder regaling me with the "police state with knobs on" reception he got trying to enter, er, Canada.
He had commited the despicable offence of......not having been in Canada for a while. Apparently the nefarious act of not visting Canada regularly has the same effect on Canadian immigration as being of a swarthy complexion and having what looks like a couple of pounds of C4 and a load of curly wires in your luggage when X-rayed does to the US types.
Thus if His Nibs the Lama has Canadian citizenship, it's probably best if he keeps it quiet.
Great idea, beer with built-in pub conversation.
When you and your mates drinking gBeer (tm) 1.0 (beta) have finished arguing over whether or not all those ingredients make it any good, you can move on to arguing whether or not moving all the ingredients around makes the slightest fucking difference to the planet's ecosystem, given the ever escalating megatonnages of crap being chucked out due to Chinese and Indian industrialisation.
".....after Ellison childishly talked about "erasing them" once they reach their integer performance."
Yup, that one made me laugh too. Partly at the ego-wanking, but mostly due to the implied assumption that IBM are going to stand still while Larry and his minions run the Red Queen's race.
IBM *will* spend loads of wonga, but not on Java. They'll spend it on making sure that the goalposts Oracle are aiming for get frictionless wheels and a bigger engine....
I shall forego my usual Durum Doner as train food after beer tonight and see if the local kebab van[1] can chuck together a kapsalon.
Actually.......they do a mean chilli sauce. Would it be terribly infra dig to chuck that on too?
[1] It's safe now. During the month of August, the whole of the country goes on holiday and this includes the staff of the kebab van. This year they left some elderly bloke to run it on his own. As far as I can make out, the only dish he knew how to make was the Montezuma's Revenge Special.
Yup. Three words: The Holy Inquisition. Definately "Christian" with a big "C" that.
I suppose I could also mention the Crusades, the Maleus Maleficorum and the Witch Hunts, the "English Martyrs" and other stuff in that vein.
I suppose that by the OPs standards, Christianity has a long and chequered record of not being, er, Christian.
Other bit. Apparently said useful resource, completely dependant on the good graces of one bloke doing his stuff for free, was relied upon by some important things.
Can anyone say "single point of failure"? No? Oh well, that's all right then.
Of course the ultimate Fail here is by Astrolabe themselves. I'll bet quite a bit that the usual suspects out in the merry world of hacktivist land aren't going to take this lying down and that Astrolabe's life is going to be a bit bloody miserable for quite a while.
"...only 61 per cent of online traders tested displayed information in more than one language...."
I'm surprised it's that high, unless they were including in that those based in countries where more than one language is "native" (e.g. BE, CH) and counting same. Which would be a bit cheesy in my book.
That's why I have Chrome installed and the only reason I fire it up. On-the-fly translation running over the rendered text works rather better than the web service options.
The actual Crystal Ball is owned by one Anonymous Coward who posted at 7:38 GMT today (in response to someone else's suggestion that Orange's "Wildfire" service had got there first) the following:
"No chance Orange can sue, Apple invented it first, they just haven't got round to rewriting history on it yet."
Well done that Coward! Now could you just tell me the Euromillions numbers for Friday please....
All the more sad when those of us with a cheap old WinMo device and a copy of MS Voice Command get most of the functionality (and all the important bits IMHO) on the device......which has bugger all by way of memory and processing horsepower.
My phonebook's stuffed with Greek, German, a variety of Central European and Scandanavian monickers and the like. It manages to get these with a truly astonishing level of accuracy from my godawful pronunciation, I have to admit there are two where its readback leaves a bit to be desired, but there are several others where its rendition is rather better than mine, so I call that a no-score draw. It also reads out meeting reminders and such. I've turned that off as it gives me the screaming willies when the disembodied voice pipes up unexpectedly in me lughole if I've left the BT headset on.
Typical MS. Having produced the "killer app", instead of building it into the system they did their damnedest to hide it as it wasn't big and complicated enough to interest their marketing types.
I've tried other handsets, car kits and such with voice control. None has come anywhere close so far.....
'- "The compiler can optimize your code better than you"
(something nobody has actually managed to demonstrate in a non-trivial case)'
Ah yes. The FORTRAN argument. Back in the day, it was always said that a "compiler" (which was a largely theoretical concept at the time) could never generate instruction level code that was as efficient as hand-optimised assembler. This was hugely important back when every byte of memory and every CPU cycle was precious.
What was proved was exactly that. The clever bit was that the FORTRAN version of the complex mathematical logic chosen for the test was developed in a couple of days rather than weeks, was only marginally slower and......gave the right answer(!) For the first time it was shown that actually the hardware cost of running the end results was not necessarily the whole story.
So the actual answer here is no, the compiler cannot optimize your code better than you, but it can certainly do it far more quickly than you can and the improvements you can get may well not be worth your time getting them.
Move on a few decades and we do seem to have lost the plot though. Any evidence of god-awful performance is inevitably greeted with "chuck hardware at it".......
Which is the problem at the root of the woes of government IT.
The way it works in the real world is: "You screw us, we shitlist you.".
IIRC, this did once happen when the previous Tory administration actually *did* shitlist one of the big consultancies, causing much smacking of gobs and gasting of flabbers at the time. Again IIRC, the firm in question promptly opened its "political donations" wallet to Bliar's mob and got their noses back into the trough come the next election. Nothing like a nice, fat bribe to focus the minds of politicians.....
"....automatic signing with signatures kept on distribution servers."
I seriously doubt it. Apart from that being bloody silly, there wouldn't have been such an outpouring of hissy fits when MS enforced signing if it all happened automagically. Also you'd have a bit of trouble explaining why the various code signatures differ, depending on who wrote a particular bit, rather than all being signed by some MS server.
Still, you just couldn't resist the irrelevant (and ridiculously inaccurate) dig at Windows in a comment section attached to an article on the mass pwnage of Linux, could you?