Re: Why would anyone want one of these?
Actually there is a serious purpose.
The rest of us will be able to spot Snapchat lusers much more easily and save us having to find out that they're a twat the hard way.
9436 publicly visible posts • joined 5 Oct 2007
...found a thick yellow cable in the way .... so he'd cut it...
Back in the day, a mate worked as an operator for a concern with a warehouse and IT suite out west of London and an office in the West End. They lost all the leased lines connecting the two simultaneously.
Turned out that a BT voice engineer had come across a set of fat cables that were "in the way" and not on his plans when working down a hole in the road somewhere between the two sites.
"We've been trying to reach a licensing agreement with Qualcomm for more than five years but they have refused to negotiate fair terms..."
Translation:
"God alone knows what they're smoking, but Qualcomm expect us to pay them. This isn't the way we do things at Apple, where we expect other companies to just be fucking grateful that their shitty technology is allowed into our wonderful products."
Now imagine a similar vulnerability being discovered in about eight years' time.
Is it fixable on the older kit? Probably not.
Is the manufacturer going to bother trying to fix it on something that old? Definitely not.
Does that make it any less serious? No.
With it not being fixed, does that make it more likely that someone will build on it to find a way of compromising the vehicle's controls? Yes.
And there you have it. The reason why the concept of the "connected car" needs to be banned. Now. It won't be of course. Government surveillance and data harvesting opportunities trump a mind-numbingly obvious lethal risk every time.
Anyone buying a car with these features needs their bumps felt.
....you can't possibly be any good because you're at university post 2000's and apparently that's an issue?
Hmm. That would be about when the world changed so that every job spec from bog-cleaner upwards suddenly required a degree. This in turn changed the majority of Universities from educational establishments catering to exceptional students into certificate farms for the proles.
Then, just in case the dumbing down hadn't gone far enough, we got a shitload of political meddling thrown into the process to ensure that every University, regardless of standards, was obliged to join the race to the bottom. Presumably this to ensure that there is a large enough workforce with a degree qualifying them as turd-scrubbers to keep the HR box-tickers happy.
I call fair comment.
Google seemingly cannot make an installer that does version compatibility checks.
Then again, as 7.0 is the highest version they've shipped for the device, why would they check for a higher one prior to install?
If you tweak it yourself, you need to take responsibility for what subsequently happens to it.
A variation on this is to publish the hype in national newspaper, disguised as a stock tip and fill your boots in the same manner when your flock of readers piles in with their cash.
This version has the advantage that, when you're caught red-handed with the ill-gotten gains, you can claim that you were just following the tip advice in your own paper and have the columnists wot wrote it sent down instead of you.
In which case, being out of contact for a while in a "not spot" wouldn't matter at all.
The only question that needs answering is whether that interest is motivated by:
a) Continuous surveillance opportunities.
b) The telcos looking for a huge trough of government cash to stuff their snouts in.
(a) has to be favourite IMHO.
If it moved with the seat, there wouldn't have been a problem. The fact that it doesn't, so moving the seat pushes the camera along the rest and into the stick rather than the whole assembly proceeding forward as one, would seem to be a prerequisite for causing this to happen.
That'll be the source of the problem. When such is in use, it can only mean one thing.
The person typing the commands, while "authorised" to do so, almost certainly hasn't got a clue what they actually do.
If they did then a) they wouldn't need some else to have written it down for them and more importantly, b) they'd have spotted the typo before hitting Enter.
The pea sized lump of fizzing sodium...
I recall a chemistry master trying to do exactly that. Unfortunately, while attempting to pare said pea-sized lump from a big stick of sodium, the stick slipped from his tongs and fell into said large glass trough.
We knew the loud bang was coming, the fact that his face went white and he hit the deck behind the bench while shouting "GET DOWN!" was a bit of a clue.
The trough was destroyed and the reinforced glass screen in a sturdy iron frame between us and it was pretty much buggered too.
Simpler than that even.
Betamax was owned by Sony and anyone wanting to make a compatible player or tape had to pay a license fee per unit to Sony.
VHS was owned by JVC and offered on a free use basis.
By the time Sony woke up, smelled the coffee and cancelled their rakeoff, it was too late. World + Dog was already churning out VHS stuff en masse.
Note also that while Beta was better in picture terms, VHS murdered it in sound. Technically it's a one-all draw.
fsck
ed by SHA-1 collision? Not so fast, says Linus Torvalds
Except of course that "create a fake email address" is not the answer, just a very, very shit workaround to an inherent problem in the product that must be fixed before implementation.
.....and one that 99.99% of people won't either know how to or bother doing. It's a spamfest waiting to happen.
Shouldn’t it be possible to have the image flow directly from Facebook to Twitter?
Yes, 'cos those services aren't competing to pwn teh internets at all and just love their users to be able to hop seamlessly from the one to the other.
Presumably the expected implementation date is sometime after Hell freezes over?
As a known "guy who can sort your PC without having to go through the support process", a colleague called me over to have a look at her machine.
Boot failure with no disk found. I powered it off, lifted the front edge about three inches, powered it on and dropped it at the appropriate point in the boot cycle. Cue sound of disk spinning up and the machine boots normally.
"Wow. I'd have thought that would be more likely to break it than fix it."
"Well, it was hardly going to make things any worse. I suggest you copy your stuff off while you can...".
I think I've mentioned this before, but I'll run it again as it's relevant.
Some years ago I was in a meeting on the new corp password policy (minimum 8, at least one capital and number). I opined that as our users were a lazy bunch and thus likely to want one password and many of our legacy systems maxed out at 8 chars for a password, I could deduce the following: A 7 letter dictionary word, first letter capitalised and a number on the end, probably zero or one. I also suggested that with that sort of hint, any competent cracking tool shouldn't need to break step on the way in.
Looking at the expressions that produced on the faces around the meeting room table, I think I hit the jackpot.
The problem here is that it's all fatuous bollocks of the highest order anyway.
When the thing's 15 minutes or so away from DOOM, they move it in minutes if someone vaguely important says something rude. If you look back at when it's been moved and why, you can immediately see that it should have been well past midnight many times, or never got closer than about ten to, if there were any consistency to it.
Clickbait, 1950s style.
Why would you be carrying a desktop in the Aldi car park?
Is this a deliberate ploy to puzzle future people seeing your shadow? If so, can I suggest jumping in the air and striking a "walk like an Egyptian" pose as the nuclear flash goes off to really give them cause for thought?