Heisenberg says.
Do cows festooned with monitoring kit behave differently in earthquakes to cows not so encumbered?
9436 publicly visible posts • joined 5 Oct 2007
Barring some sort of antigravity device, this is probably about as close to a practical flying car as we're going to get for some time. It does STOL, it's pretty much burke-proof, having a parafoil wing, and the aeronautical bits fold into the boot (parafoil again) so you don't have to drive around looking like aircraft origami.
That little lot coupled with a three minute transition from one to t'other makes me think they have a winner.
In an ideal world a flying car would have a better solution to the wing conundrum and do VTOL. However, as far as I can see the only contender in this area is the Moller product, but that seems to be more of a device for converting venture capital into bullshit than a flying car.
Rats find grids easier to navigate quickly, therefore so do people? That's a bit of a leap. An obvious difference that renders the whole thing a complete and utter load of festering bollocks is that rats don't read maps, use satellite navigation systems, take taxis or ask for directions.
TECHNO-LEAF????!!!?????
I've got absofuckinglutely no idea what one of these really is*, but I call for the banhammer on this term. Now. What is it about the septics that they can't do anything even vaguely innovative without coming up with a whole appendix to the lexicon of shite neologisms to describe it?
*Which is sort of the point. What's the reasoning behind dreaming up a shite buzzword if the result doesn't leave the reader any the wiser as to WTF it's describing?
Not so smug sunshine, if you please!
I've heard it said that a potential indicator of life in an oxy / helium atmosphered world is the quantities of methane in the jolly old atmos courtesy of the botty burblings of the herbivorous ruminants inhabiting the place. All veggie fuelled.
Now, I don't know about you, but while I'll admit that a few people in the immediate blast radius have, on occasion, taken issue with some of my more voluminous productions, I have yet to find anyone calling up from a few thousand light-years away to point out that they noticed it too.
While it's true that my more meaty diet may lend a certain piquancy to some of my output, I reckon that the sheer bulk of same is more vegetable related. I certainly find that a diet richer in pulses and fibre lends itself to a classic rasp, while on meat-heavy days the output tends towards the vile squeaker or even the SBD.
The discrepancy between Google's opinion of the CO2 cost and the Prof's (however un-kettle like the results may actually be) looks quite simple to explain.
The way I read this when I first saw it, Google are saying "we use x" and the Prof is saying "the cost is y". The fact that x and y are different numbers is because x=apples (Google's 'leccy consumption) and y=pears (Google + your PC + all those other bits in between that make it work).
I think I'd rather do my bit for the planet by burning a facsimile of a Tudor Rose on the wall......
Too true, too true. I read that as the point of the whole article though. These arsehats were given the keys to the kingdom*, they could have done anything, but they used 'em to open the fridge and take some free cans of coke.
*Ok. A very small kingdom populated entirely by sad gits with no life, but the analogy's sound.
Here's how it really works. Incoming government looks at big high-cost projects. Decides they're NFG and cans 'em. Once feet are under table, dreams up new exciting "initiatives" that require, er, big high-cost projects to implement.
Big consultancies declare record profits from providing services in winding up projects in category A and kicking off projects in category B.
Oh, and the reason that the Home Office behaves like that is that they're Civil Servants (hah!). The change in the colour of the minister's tie doesn't affect the day-to-day running of the place.
"The gravy train will be leaving from platform two and not platform one as previously announced."
Always wondered what one of these was, so I followed the link.
It says here that a Victrola is an "internal horn phonograph". i.e. the important difference is that the acoustic horn is hidden within the box providing a more pleasing appearance to the device as a piece of furniture. Anyone at Gryphon characterising that enormous excresence as being inspired by such has missed the point. Big time.
Maybe it doesn't say to me what it does to other people. I look at that and think anyone standing in front of a tank in a war zone chucking things at it* is as dumb as a bag of hammers and angling for a Darwin Award.
The fact that both he and the photographer behind him appear to be in one piece shows a certain degree of restraint and care in their threat analysis by those in the tank in question.
*You want to do this right? Look at the famous Tiananmen Square footage. Stand in a non-threatening manner in front of the thing. Move only to obstruct it when it tries to drive round you. That way, if it does open fire, you can become a world-famous innocent victim rather than just another rock throwing dickhead biting off more than he can chew.
No shit, Sherlock! It takes a lot of fuel to move a big aircraft. Now look at the fuel burned per passenger / freight kilo mile and compare it to, say, a 747. This is why, with fuel economy as pretty much the top driver in airline purchasing decisions in the current economic climate, the 380 has a fat order book.
If it was in any way uneconomic on fuel, Airbus wouldn't be able to give the sodding things away.
Why obfuscated? Here's a better one. Post real, honest to go source for something useful and moody binaries. When binary is run it does nothing but drop a trojan and then fake an error. I reckon 95% of people will go "oh shit, it doesn't work", uninstall the original binaries and forget about it. 4.9999% will go on to grab the source, compile it, find it works and forget about it. That leaves just the 0.00001% who'll go to the trouble of subsequently examining their compiled version, comparing it to the supplied one as potential troublemakers.
Hmm, if this takes off (oops, sorry) and Ryanair get confused between the perceived scum in the back and the actual scum in the wing tanks, it could all get nasty. Does soylent green count as a renewable resource?
Oh, and thousand seperators in numbers? I never have a problem with that. It's the ones with commas as decimal points that I've learned to distrust. Also, since the US aircraft industry does its fuel calculations in pounds, those almost certainly *are* the original figures. Conversion to kilos might well introduce rounding errors though.....
Er, that's what test flights are for. I recall that SpaceShip One also got a tail redesign as a result of flight testing.
It'll only be an issue if some daft planning type has got it scheduled to go straight from testing to production without allowing some time for going over the test findings and fixing the problems found in testing (What do you mean you thought there wouldn't be any? WTF did you schedule the testing for then?). Anyone that shite gets out of aeronautics and into IT consultancy* where they belong real quick.
Move along, nothing to see here.
*For the angle, of course.
I wonder what's wrong with just replacing the Alkaline "D" cells with off-the-shelf NiMh ones and adding a charging circuit and plug? Ok, nowhere near as interesting as designing a new Li-ion battery pack, but it'd work and cost sod all to do.
I suppose the main drawback with the existing version has to be when it refuses to work. You just *know* the reason's going to be that someone's put one in the wrong way round......
(Note to self. Robotic subs make bad Christmas presents.)
No doubt you are now conducting market research to find the correct price point and signing up resellers.
Don't bother. You'll sell every one of these you can make, even if they're priced to be hand assembled by Tibetan nuns from rocking horse shit placed in an unobtanium casing and only sold through one online outlet in Baghdad.
Hmm, drool has the same effect on keyboards as coffee. Who knew?
Ok, so the card warranty's intact, but presumably ripping off the stock cooler and sticking the Atomic block on your CPU could well leave you in the lurch if anything goes wrong in that department.
Certainly every PIB I've ever bought came with a warning that the use of anything other than the provided cooler or one from the list of approved coolers on the manufacturer's website would invalidate the warranty. Of course, you can always claim you *were* using the stock cooler, but then you can always screw the vanilla one back onto your graphics card too*.
Even less attractive then.
*Smart hardware monkeys take reference photos when dismantling and keep a variety of thermals pastes, pads and glues in stock to add veracity to this process.
Same way world + dog on the 'net does it. Once your Account's been blocked, your next attempt is greeted with something like: You have made three incorrect login attempts. Shove this button to get a new password mailed to the email account you registered with us. Said new pwd turns up and the first thing you get to do on using it is change it.
I recall some bright managerial tit extolling the virtues of this for our systems not so long back. It had to be the right thing 'cos "that's the way everyone does it on teh Intertoobs". My innocent question as to, given it was the desktop / LDAP password he was talking about, how the f*** the user was supposed to get at their company email account to find the new password, let alone gain access to the Intranet to use said automated reset system in the first place, went down like a cup of warm sick.....
Yup, too true. Take that, add Greem's winge above about how much of a PITA it is getting lusers asking dumb arse questions in the support forums (and draw your own conclusions on some of the responses they're seeing - "community support" is *supposed* to be a plus) and you can see why MS and Apple are not exactly quaking in their boots.
Nah, no need. Every time this happens for real they just wait until he rises from the dead three days later.
The reason he's absent this year is 'cos he's currently taking a lie down in a rock-hewn tomb outside Cupertino with a big stone over the entrance.
This also explains the dearth of really cool stuff alluded to. Apple insiders have now learned the sacred lesson that nobody should say anything important while Jobs is busily being dead.
What I'd be interested to know is if there was an avenue by which they could pay the artists directly*, how many of 'em would actually do so.
My money's firmly bet on none at all here.
*An anonymous cash donation to the Musician's Union is probably the closest you can get to this right now. They may not give money to artists (quite the reverse) but they are the only thing that stops the labels screwing the poor buggers into bankruptcy.
No question about it.
The guts of this beast are quite obviously a rehash of Mattel's Harry Potter levitating challenge game. My kids used to have one. Ok, it's now in white and pastel colours rather than brown (pseudo wood), black and other such less tech-friendly shades, but it's the same thing.
If you don't believe me, link: http://www.toymania.com/columns/spotlight/hplevgame.shtml
I reckon that you wind the knob on the front to move the fan around the circuit. The ball stays in the airstream courtesy of Bernoulli. The headset does something to control the altitude of the ball (fan speed). The Potter thing used to come with a handle to control fan power that also made the Potter figure in the middle wave his wand up and down.
Conclusion: Mattel seeking to get some extra cash out of a long obsolete product by rehashing it to appeal to a new audience.