Re: How about this.
I can see a problem with the sixth point. Here's a scenario.
1) Small inventor patents rather clever and efficient process.
2) Big, evil company produces prototype product using new efficient process under wraps.
3) Big, evil company lobbies government to require use of efficient process as opposed to old, inefficient process.
4) Government snaps up "greenwash" opportunity.
5) Big, evil company does a Blue Peter product launch ("Here's one I prepared earlier").
6) Small inventor takes the shaft.
I can also see a problem with the seventh. Here's the new lucre-rich point for fancy lawyers to "demonstrate" big, evil company's "independent" innovation. Another way for the small innovator (who can't afford the big legal bills) to get rogered up the backside.
I'd add a ninth point. Any attempt to sue someone for patent violation which results in your patent being held invalid / inapplicable should automatically result in your picking up *both* sets of legal costs in full. i.e. you'd better be bloody sure it's sound, bulletproof and that it is being ripped off before even *thinking* about trying it on.