ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
Cyclopean slime covered capsules from the sea pulsing with eldritch energies. He is risen!
Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!
1501 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Sep 2007
I don't expect anything less from them. They are spectacularly useless at everything and having non-functional or no aircon in a branch is just the lesser of their various bizarre ideas. MPdS tends to assume that money paid into an account is a gift to them. They also regularly "do over" customers by randomly not paying direct debits or standing orders or as in my case just forgetting that I had a direct debit for electricity and losing all details of the payments.
I think these are models built from the Arecibo/Goldstone imaging of 1996 FG3 using Doppler radar. There are some details and image resolutions given in this paper. There is more detail here.
"I think you will find that those who operate ponzi schemes have 'commercial interests'...."
I think you will find that the biggest operators of Ponzi schemes are governments. They refer to them as "pension schemes" but unlike real pension funds which have to invest the customer's payments then arrange to pay the customer their pension based on the investment governments just spend the money and pay current claimants money from current contributors. A genuine Ponzi scheme.
"Here's a clue, it's the Common *Unix* Printing System."
Here's one for you, Linux isn't UNIX and MacOS is BSD based. You may not like Apple being involved, that's your right. But it's nonsense to say they give nothing back when they clearly do. Purist ideologies are corrosive and ultimately self-defeating.
"OEMs (military, government, businesses etc) will never use GPL... Such a seemingly clueless statement clearly designed to misinform and/or misdirect makes me wonder what the real intent behind this "gift" are."
It's not clueless. I've seen government and military system development halted and then ripped down to start again because some clueless contractor has used GPL'd source code in an attempt to cut development costs. It should be a bit obvious that the military in particular do not want to publish the code they developed, much less give it away free to the competition.
"I don’t think you understand who is contributing code to Linux."
Indeed, I sometimes smirk at the Linux fanboys who start ranting about Apple and how much they hate them and that Apple don't contribute to the Open Source community. The same people using LLVM, Clang, Webkit, CUPS, and Apache Traffic Server.
"In my opinion (as a Linux user, not coder, programmer or maintainer) I really don't think the Linux kernel needs to add another 27,000 lines of code to get ... nothing?"
And there are other users who would find a kernel driver with R/W useful. I think you've fallen into that trap of thinking that what you use is all that anyone else would ever need.
I used Corel Draw and had used both Freehand (much missed) and Illustrator before. I found Corel Draw to be awful, terrible interface, really poor drawing options, completely illogical and didn't interface at all well with printers. I can see how if your experience started with Corel Draw how you could find alternative interfaces confusing. That said, I found the Gimp difficult to use at first - not as good as Photoshop - and I suspect that I'll find Inkscape offers new challenges.
"All sensors are analog"
<screws up face> Weeellllll, no, not all sensors. Single photon counters for example detect a single photon event and output a pulse (binary) signal.
I used to work for a medical diagnostic company making, among other things, professional quantitative pregnancy testing systems. These were very expensive, around £30,000 each. They were recognised as industry-leading systems and used as a reference source by international standards organisations. Yet, at the centre of all the expensive electronics was a small plastic cell that developed a colour change from clear to pink. That is the basis of an enzyme immune assay (EIA). Does this mean that the $30K was wasted money? Not if you were running a lab in a busy hospital. The automated system is reproducible, reliable and has greater throughput than a human being. Most testing systems are analogue in nature. The digitisation happens when a sensor reads a value and presents it as a number for analysis. Which is what is happening in this case.
I'm not sure why the surprise and why the handwaving. Was the author expecting a Maxwell's Demon based system where an imp counts the actual molecules of hCG then types them into a very small keyboard?
I'm putting on my labcoat.
At least Mulder never gave up.
MS have always had a policy of adopt, adapt, improve, enclose, control. Every OpenSource initiative that I have been involved with that has MS members on the team gets nudged bit-by-bit into a situation where MS dominate the direction of development. If they can't achieve that they then have a history of taking their ball back.
"What's your issue with ARM Macs?"
Possibly one of those who is doesn't know that Apple have used Motorola, IBM and Intel processors in previous models and at each change of processor architecture the users were mostly unaware of the change. I keep seeing the unknowing predicting dire things if Apple changes to ARM, usually based on a flawed understanding of how Apple has implemented emulation in the past. Given the design of MacOS it's possible to execute most of the system code natively and emulate only the small fraction of code that is created by the developer. Microsoft has always struggled with replatforming code, Apple were fortunate to inherit the excellent design work done by (mostly) Xerox PARC engineers.
" I seem to remember that there was a case a bit like this - but made of metal rather than plastic, and looking a bit too industrial for my aesthetic sensibilities!"
I think that may have been the Fuze keyboard, case and GPIO breakout board.
Although I have many tiny PCs in my workshop they are all anonymous Chinese NUC-type hockey pucks with J1900 or N3450 processors. With 4-8GB of RAM, USB3 and multiple 1Gb Ethernet ports they just seem more useful than a Pi. Even the Pi Hole which I thought may be useful was actually less useful than a pfsense box with pfBlocker-NG and 4 x Ethernet. I guess it's all horses for courses. Pi users seem very protective of the little beasts and they do seem to inhabit the ZX Spectrum / BBC Micro ecological niche, so probably perfectly designed for the people who find them useful/interesting.
As to a Pi laptop, an anonymous Chinese N3450 laptop seems to fit the bill better. I use one because it's as light and slim as a MacBook air and cost £200. A good toy to use for computing projects.
"Let me guess - with these advances, experts predict we'll have fusion power for the masses in 20 years?"
Thirty years is the "traditional" value. It has held good for all of my life, which started a long time ago.
"Nuclear fusion energy is 30 years away...and always will be."
Having seen and worked on Government IT from both inside and outside the wire, I'm still bemused why government continues to pursue using other people's IT systems (cloud). The scale of government IT is such that *if* it could get itself organised then it would be far cheaper for central government to provide appropriate IT services for all of government. But it's that "if" where things tend to die.
One government scheme that I worked on that was declared "too important" to leave to industry to manage started to founder when the civil service could not get the hang of the idea of 24/7 operations. Several key staff were single-manning their roles and were working so hard that TOIL suddenly applied and their desks were vacant for days/weeks at time. Requests to understand that each post needed at least 3 bodies to cover three 8 hour shifts were ignored. Senior civil servants argued that it was ludicrous that a small department would have three senior civil servants of the same grade (eg three data centre managers, three security managers...) and also couldn't work out that we were competing in the market for talent with big payers.
Sort out the whacky career structure and realise that renting MIPs and storage is a bad idea and they may be able to sort it out. At the moment there's insistence that they can rent *any* service followed by sick realisation that they really don't want to platform share with industry, hackers and others.
I once worked at a tech. company with its headquarters on the same site as McLaren. Our owner was very old and his son was taking over running the business. The son loved race cars and racing yachts. We shared an office because I was one of the people training him to understand the products that we created. One lunchtime he was out and reception called to say that they had a visitor held in reception and they needed the bosses son to vouch for the visitor because he was repeating his name and saying he had an, appointment that they couldn't trace. I was the only one in the office at the time so I said I'd come down to deal with it. The receptionist was quite upset because the person in question was "wearing casual clothes" and she couldn't believe that he'd have a genuine reason to have an appointment with someone who was, after all, a billionaire who tended to keep other people at a distance.
I did a double-take. The person in reception was Ron Dennis, wearing clothing that was indeed "casual" but had probably cost more than my monthly salary. He had an appointment but the bosses son had forgotten to tell anyone. I was gobsmacked that the receptionist could think he was scruffy just because he didn't have a jacket.
I used to have 4xPhaser colour printers. When fresh the colour quality was unbeatable. Sadly over quite a short time the printed image begins to blur and the image colour isn't stable. Also since they run heaters 24/7 the temperature in the office could be amusing and the electricity bill was staggering. You're effectively running a 250W heater night and day. Or in our case 1kW of heating.
The ink tank printer uses almost no electricity even when running - no heaters. The colour quality is good when used on the right sort of paper and the ink itself is very cheap.
"IMO you're better off with a Laser printer - no jets to clog"
In my experience the laser toner ends up "caking" in the cartridge so the cheaper cost per page is illusory. Even more so if you compare costs vs a tank printer.
Each technology has its place. Ink cartridges with built-in print heads for occasional users, lasers for people who don't care about decent colour output and who have print volumes great enough to use up the toner before it gets too old, ink tank for people who want decent colour output and who have more than an occasional use for printed copy. The ink tank duplex printers we are currently using as workgroup printers give lasers a run for their money. Ink jet clogging never seems to be a thing and if it does happen it's usually relatively simple maintenance to get them working again.
Frequently bought together
"the Government has very robust systems in place to protect the IT systems of officials and staff."
It's possible this is not actually a lie, it's a Humphreyesque avoidance of telling the truth. So economical with la vérité that there's no vérité visible to the naked eye.
Yes, government has very robust systems to protect the IT systems of officials and staff. However politicians don't like the handcuffs that imposes, so they set up and use their own email systems. They rely either on email systems provided by their constituency or just wave their credit card around until someone takes pity and supplies them with a shonky webmail service. Then they transfer all the documents that should remain on government systems to their private email, so they can work on it using their iPad on the train.
The "robust" systems get a good ignoring. Worse than that, it's reasonably common for ministers to give their passwords to other people so that they can answer mail on their behalf. I suspect that the spearphishing attack on Liam Fox was of that nature.
I have two QNAPs and one Synology the Synology was cheap, doesn't have hot swappable bays and feels cheap - plastic case. It was a pain to install drives on the Synology because it needs to be dismantled to get access to the drive bays. That said it was less than half the price of the QNAPs and works, mostly, just as well. The Synology web interface is prettier but not as capable as the QNAP offering. QNAP has features such as NUT for managing/reporting UPS status that doesn't seem to exist on the Synology. The Synology doesn't report the SATA interface speed for some reason, the QNAP does. It's still possible to load a package manager on the Synology and add your own command-line tools, this feature was removed from QNAPs a couple of years ago.
Really not much to choose between them. I got the Synology because after upgrading the drives in one of the QNAP to 4x8TB it seemed a shame to just throw away the 4x3TB drives that I had removed. So now I can use the Synology for multimedia storage.
I recall that setting up rsync to work between QNAP and Synology was a pain, but can't remember why.
"Not sure what more help would be required?"
For government IT an explanation of what GitHub is, £900,000 in consultancy fees to write a report that says that GitHub is used by Chinese hackers therefore unsafe. Another £150,000 to re-write the report at a level that could be understood by an MP, followed by a Cabinet Office edict to state that GIThub is to be blocked on all government networks.
" I use a pfsense firewall with DNS which then points to a pihole."
I'm wondering why you do that. PfblockerNG does everything that a pihole does and it integrates with DNS resolver. It also logs natively on your pfsense firewall so that you can see what's going on and get alerts via the web interface. It even uses the same blocklists as pihole.
"Yes but I thought "Macs don't get viruses"?"
I think you may be thinking about claims made about Chromebooks. They even feature in advertising for the Chromebook.
The first Mac virus I recall seeing was nVir in 1987. Then John Norstadt's Disinfectant appeared as the first anti-Malware software that I had seen. Graham Cluley has documented the history of Mac malware. It's worth a read. I haven't seen anyone other than the terminally clueless state that Macs don't get viruses. Although with OSX the scope for viruses to propagate has been severely curtailed and proofs of concept often require a lot of user compliance to give the virus the permissions it needs to infect system files.
As someone else has said, malware that runs in userspace is more of an issue. Ransomware, crypto-currency miners, Trojans etc only need user permissions to do their stuff. If you can execute code on your computer then malware can execute on your computer. The only effective way to stop it is to make it a pain to use your computer.
I heard the announcement on Radio 4's "Today" programme. I say in slack-jawed yokel mode listening to it, thinking "What the actual..?" This was because I know "quite a bit" about OneWeb and know that key team members were dismissed at the time that OneWeb filed for Chapter 11. The concept is (was) a good one, the technical performance was excellent and at one point the launch schedule and satellite manufacture were ahead of Elon Musk's Starlink. The problem was that as soon as it was obvious that Covid-19 would result in an economic downturn the investors got cold feet and refused to pay for the next tranche of work.
The reason that I was boggled by the government announcement was that it's obvious to anyone who understands the technology that a LEO satellite communications system depending on microsatellites cannot function as a positioning system. Also modifying the existing satellite design is unlikely. The satellite launcher is a dispenser design, closely matched to the size of the satellites. Change the satellite design and the dispenser may also need a redesign.
If the intention is to operate this network for military comms then the locations of the ground stations becomes an issue. Some of them are in countries that won't permit military use. Some of them in countries that UK government would not choose for the location of a military comms hub.
There are many issues to solve and the stated reasons for the purchase don't look credible, there would, as ever with government projects, be hidden costs and cost over runs. I can't even see how they could attract the OneWeb staff back, they are people whose skills are in demand and I think most of them are now settled elsewhere.
"They've been called Skynet since the sixties."
The copyright holder - that may have been Skydance Media - sent a cease and desist notice to Paradigm/Airbus demanding that they stop using the "Skynet" name. Apparently a bit shocked to be told that they were infringing the MOD's intellectual property. I'm just sad that MOD didn't then sue them or issue a DMCA takedown for the entire Terminator franchise.
"Council services are still NOT centralised"
This is a failure of central government which washes its hands of supporting local government effectively. It would be reasonable to expect HMG to provide a SaaS solution that would permit local governments simply to configure for their own "branding" and geographical location. It is, after all, what many local authorities already do for organisations within their boundaries. Parish councils, town councils etc are often consuming a service provided by the County council. Sadly government is always very big about talking about reduction of inefficiency, joined-up services, "supporting our communities" etc. and very bad at actually doing something to achieve those goals.
That when the FBI want to pursue an investigation they are able to do the complicated and time-consuming job of collecting and collating information from numerous messaging systems, accounts, mobile devices etc. Yet when it comes to investigating political chicanery the same diligence and technical capability appears to be absent. Presumably the team(s) that investigate commercial and personal wrongdoing are much, much better at their jobs than the ones that investigate political corruption, bullying, harassment and downright treachery. I mean there, couldn't possibly be another explanation, could there?
"Apple has a pretty poor track record of backwards compatibility,"
Not in my experience. I've weathered the changes from Motorola to Power to Intel without any problems or loss of software. During the same time with Microsoft mostly on Intel I've had the experience of the worst backward compatibility I can recall, as even relatively minor OS version changes have resulted in software that stops working. By the time Apple has dropped support for a previous version of software the manufacturers have released native versions as part of the upgrade process.