Reply to post: No loss in model accuracy?

Why, you're no better than an 8-bit hustler: IBM punts paper on time-saving DNN-training trick

Mike 16

No loss in model accuracy?

That sounds a lot like the typical advertising "There is no better <x>", which they intend us to read as "This is clearly the best" while those who stayed awake in rhetoric might discern it as "This is not really any worse than the rest of the crap".

I like the analog stuff, though. At last an explanation for occasionally wildly odd AI results. "It works just like your brain", which is so simple/obvious that even Uncle Phil can understand, after a few too many pints.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon