Reply to post: Re: You would think

Google: Our DeepMind health slurp is completely kosher

JohnFen

Re: You would think

"It's clearly mentioned this is anonymous data"

You say that as if it's meaningful. Just calling the data "anonymized" is meaningless. Most popular methods of "anonymizing" data is ineffective in the face of Big Data, which often makes deanonymizing data very easy to do. Some forms can be effective (such as only keeping data aggregated with that of large numbers of other people and deleting individual data records), but we don't know if that's what they're doing or not.

If not, then "anonymous data" is effectively a lie.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon