@gerritv
None of that is relevant.
They are a commercial operation who are paid to provide their products. No matter how hard it is, that is their job.
They have been making commercial decisions to save money, even though they made ~$16.5billion profit their last financial year, by cutting their test teams. They choose where to allocate their resources, and they could choose to allocate more resources to their testing and validation process. They could also choose to change their release cycle to yearly to more thoroughly test and validate their work.
If it's too hard, they are free to choose to exit that market entirely.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
