Reply to post: why not simply have a 'foreach' ?

What's all the C Plus Fuss? Bjarne Stroustrup warns of dangerous future plans for his C++

Anonymous Coward
IT Angle

why not simply have a 'foreach' ?

> why not simply have a 'foreach' ?

Because computer programming is an esoteric art form not to the shared with the hoi polloi :]

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon